boeing 747, pentagon, sure.

[whatty]

welcome to my newest thread, i have been dormant for the past month or two and i am jus catching up on my work at school

but...
i am here today to tell you why it is imposible for a boeing 747 could possibly, crash into the pentagon,

it is undisputable, to say that a boeing 747 crashed into the world trade centre's, with all the footage, eyewitness accounts etc,

but why is your country denieying you from the truth,
why is it that there was not debris found,
why is it that no footage was released when more was caught that the wtc?

there is something goin on,
or
bush is overestimating what the reation would be if, say, a "missile" hit the pentagon, or if a internal explosion blew it up

why is it they never found a black box,
why is it that the flight 102, (heading for pentagon) dissapeared from readar,

because the pentagon is the 2nd most protected building in the USA,
the pentagon has automated SAM sights, the pentagon is a restricted airspace, any plane would be blown out of the sky out of this world,

PYNSLVANNIA (horrible spelling sorry)

plane crashes in feild, it was on course to the white house, but no worries, heroic passengers who had no idea where they were stormed the cockpit,
the hijackers new they wouldnt make it!
so they crash the plane into a feild,

can i ask you again,
why was there an airplane engine 10 miles away from the crash site,

planes have crashes into mountains and had a smaller debris feild,
this happens when it is shot out of the sky"!

so

post your thoughts!
post your mind!
layit into me why you think im wrong,

thanks

(if you would like to watch a flash go to this site

the site will be posted l;ater my comp is fucked again!

[whatty]

www.ebaumsworld.com/pentagon.html

[Demosthenez]

Why is everyone so convinced they knew that the Goverment is lying. Plus this topic has been posted like a million times already. Why make a new one to spout this crap again?

Why I know its wrong. WHO THE HELL FIRED THE MISSLE? A dirt poor terrorist acquiring a $200 mil Cruise missle? The US firing it on ourselves?

AND MUTHER FUCKING WHY? No reason. Absolutely none. I dont feel like going onto more depth because this is ridiculous. Simplified: Plane ran into reinforced metal shit, lotsa fuel, going fast as shit=limited wreckage. And there was wreckage. So quiet this crap.

[Kev-o]

WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE PEOPLE WHO WERE ON THE PLANE THEN?!

[whatty]

At 9/17/04 06:59 PM, FAB0L0US wrote: AND MUTHER FUCKING WHY?

cuz you got anger problems, if you read it properly, you would notice i havent been on in a funking, month you prick stain!

lol

thanks for the reply though!

[Memorize]

weve watched the movie before, theres one here and one on the general forum. people say that mabey a bomb went off, then they say we did it or bush did. i dont know why they have to make the pentagon situation an issue, it just sounds like something that people use to blame either us or bush.

it is undisputable, to say that a boeing 747 crashed into the world trade centre's, with all the footage, eyewitness accounts etc, but why is your country denieying you from the truth,

why is it that there was not debris found,
why is it that no footage was released when more was caught that the wtc?

what do you think, the wtc was a huge structure, do you think they wouldve found debris. they over fueled the planes so they would make a bigger explosion on impact. i doubt so many people had cameras when it happend, it seem to happen so unexpected that only a few would acually catch a plane running into the trade center.

why was there an airplane engine 10 miles away from the crash site

who knows what couldve happend on that plane. one of the people who fought back called his wife and left a messege that him and a few others would try and stop them.

[Demosthenez]

At 9/17/04 07:18 PM, whatty wrote:

At 9/17/04 06:59 PM, FAB0L0US wrote: AND MUTHER FUCKING WHY?

cuz you got anger problems, if you read it properly, you would notice i havent been on in a funking, month you prick stain!

lol

thanks for the reply though!

Hey no problem. Im just a giving guy :)

Reason I bet that engine was still there but far away? Plane hit ground not as fast or at a certain angle to account for the survivability of engine. Probably also less fuel.

I will copntinue to discount all these conspiracy theories until a physics major proves to me from all the available evidence that it HAS to be a hoax. And I doubt that will ever happen, so you believe what you want and I will continue to know the truth and try to convince you all.

[whatty]

At 9/17/04 07:19 PM, Soul_Specter wrote:

it is undisputable, to say that a boeing 747 crashed into the world trade centre's, with all the footage, eyewitness accounts etc, but why is your country denieying you from the truth,

why is it that there was not debris found,
why is it that no footage was released when more was caught that the wtc?

you seem to be mistaken, i am talking about the pentagon , no debris at the pentagon my mistake! sorry

[whatty]

At 9/17/04 07:19 PM, Soul_Specter wrote:

who knows what couldve happend on that plane. one of the people who fought back called his wife and left a messege that him and a few others would try and stop them.

this is impossible, planes are fitted with lead pipes alone the roofs to stop signals from "cell phones" interfering with the technics off the plane

[whatty]

At 9/17/04 07:38 PM, FAB0L0US wrote:

Reason I bet that engine was still there but far away? Plane hit ground not as fast or at a certain angle to account for the survivability of engine. Probably also less fuel.

I will copntinue to discount all these conspiracy theories until a physics major proves to me from all the available evidence that it HAS to be a hoax. And I doubt that will ever happen, so you believe what you want and I will continue to know the truth and try to convince you all.

ok im not goin to try to persuade you but the plane was all over the place, a 20 mile debris feild!

its those poxy sam sites
apox on them!
i hate sam anyway!

[The-Vox]

DOCTORED MOVIE/PICTURES

[JoS]

There are compelling arguements for both sides. To answer the question of where are the passengers, some speculation is that the passengers were members of the witness relocation program, and therefore would never ever come forward, since they would fear death from OC. I have talked with my friend who has a degree in engineering pyshics and he said that a crash like that should still have wreckage. There are many unaswered questions, and such will mean much debate. Just like is Elvis really dead? Although it was interesting that the fire department said that it wasn't a plane or something like that, can't remember exactly.

[Ravens-Grin]

At 9/17/04 07:55 PM, whatty wrote: this is impossible, planes are fitted with lead pipes alone the roofs to stop signals from "cell phones" interfering with the technics off the plane

One, the cell phone towers are down towards the ground, so the lead wouldn't block the call. Second of all, why would they weigh down the planes? Thirdly, they calculated that a planes technics can exceed over 2000x radiation of a typical cell phone call. They actually couldn't detect any noticeable change in technics behavior even at this radiation.

As for the plane hitting the Pentagon. It happened. The Reagan National Airport is less then 5 miles away, so they would not have shot down a plane that could have misinterpreted a landing, and prepared for the worst a little too late.

[Elfer]

You ask where the wreckage is? WELCOME TO BASIC PHYSICS.

You ask where the black box is? WELCOME TO THE CONCEPT OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT DEALS WITH AN INVESTIGATION.

[Redwrath]

Two possible situations:
#1
The plane hit the pentagon and the black box was completely destroyed due to a manufacturing error.

#2
A hidden SAM site misfired and exploded, causing a huge fire that burned a large portion of the pentagon.

(#3)
(This is all a dream and when you wake up, you will not remember it.)

[whatty]

At 9/17/04 10:08 PM, Ravens_Grin wrote:

At 9/17/04 07:55 PM, whatty wrote: this is impossible, planes are fitted with lead pipes alone the roofs to stop signals from "cell phones" interfering with the technics off the plane

One, the cell phone towers are down towards the ground, so the lead wouldn't block the call. Second of all, why would they weigh down the planes? Thirdly, they calculated that a planes technics can exceed over 2000x radiation of a typical cell phone call. They actually couldn't detect any noticeable change in technics behavior even at this radiation.

As for the plane hitting the Pentagon. It happened. The Reagan National Airport is less then 5 miles away, so they would not have shot down a plane that could have misinterpreted a landing, and prepared for the worst a little too late.

well, to start, i think that i would know this, my father was a pilot of a boing 747,
two radio signals cant interact with a tower when its moving at 520 mph,
so shut up, you dont have a clue,

i wish people would have some proof before they start bitching!

but honestly, on the footage, the object that was heading towards the pentagon was two! i reapeat two feet off the ground!
### no reports off turbulance or wind wake on a national road! no cars turned over.
two,
where is all the footage< there was 5 cameras recording they explosion!
where are they,
some one doesnt want you's to see em!

anyway beileve what you want jus dont start shitting on my theories without some proof, reason why or knowlege of what you speak,

but thanks 4 all those replies!

whatty!

[IllustriousPotentate]

Okay people, read these, and then see what you think.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

A Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.

[FatherVenom]

At 9/17/04 06:49 PM, whatty wrote: i am here today to tell you why it is imposible for a boeing 747 could possibly, crash into the pentagon,

It wasn't a 747.

but why is your country denieying you from the truth,
why is it that there was not debris found,

A couple of friends of mine were in D.C. One of them saw some of the debris.

why is it that the flight 102, (heading for pentagon) dissapeared from readar,

Radar gets confused by low flying objects.

plane crashes in feild, it was on course to the white house, but no worries, heroic passengers who had no idea where they were stormed the cockpit,
the hijackers new they wouldnt make it!
so they crash the plane into a feild,

That's purely conjecture.

Shrike isn't going to be happy you. He's already warned people that this was a sore subject with him, being from D.C.

[snapper0505]

if your looking for an eyewitness account, here is one. i saw it hit with my own 2 eyes. i was on the highway going past, and i was about a mile from it, when i look in my rearview mirror, and KABLAM! plane hits.

happy? it happened. plus, its a strange place to have a camera because the it was on the backside of the building. not many people would be just there with a camera, and i doubt many tourists with cameras are allowed in the pentagon. only way you could have seen it is if you were filming form the highway next to it, and i dont know about you, but when a hundred people think their under attack from a bomb or something, and see an explosion next to the highway, i dont think theyll just stop and let you get out to film it.

it was hectic. it happened. live with it. stop stirring stuff up.

[Montgomery-Scott]

PEOPLE!!! USE THE SEARCH BUTTON!!!

[whatty]

At 9/18/04 06:54 AM, IllustriousPotentate wrote: Okay people, read these, and then see what you think.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

A Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.

ok ok, i have been beaten well done, but i still feel sorrta empty now.

[n0ir]

At 9/17/04 07:03 PM, Kev-o wrote: WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE PEOPLE WHO WERE ON THE PLANE THEN?!

Yea people just walk out with a few scratches after crashing into a building.

[JoS]

To the guy who posted he saw this happen I have afew questions. Did you physcially see the plane hit the building. Did the plane leave your sight for even a moment? Unless you actually saw a jumbo jet hit the building then you are not actually a reliable witness. If you saw a low flying plane then saw a fireball appear in the place it passed doesnt mean you saw the crash. Since the airport is soo close it is possible it turned off engines and coasted into the airport (as some reports speculate). The human mind is a strange thing. It will try and put two and two togther to make 4, although sometimes it actually makes three. It tries to fill in blanks, but sometimes it will create things. This is why eyewitnesses are always seperated and do not hear what others say. If I threw a ball and you saw me throw it, then saw a guy lying on the ground and the ball lying near him your brain fills in the gap and tells you that the ball hit the guy, but you never actually saw the ball hit the guy. Its entirely possible that he wasnt hit by the ball. I cant really put too much more on that subject in here cause it would take up too much room. I hope you get the jist of it though.

[snapper0505]

ok. there was a plane. it was about 50 yards away from the building when i saw it, going at a diagonal angle for it. i let my eyes off of it. look back. there is a huge ball o fire. i wonder where the plane went? i guess it just flat-out dissapeared! no, i dont think i could mistake a low-flying plane and a plane that hits a building, especially when its a restricted air zone anyway. there wouldnt be any low flying planes.

[whatty]

i think you should look at my other topic, "boeing 757, pentagon, yes actually

CHECK IT OUT!"

[JoS-1]

At 9/19/04 07:08 AM, whatty wrote: i think you should look at my other topic, "boeing 757, pentagon, yes actually

CHECK IT OUT!"

spamm0rz.
der waz no planez. gov't is lying. butt why?

[whatty]

umm, dunno what to think,

your spelling need work though

whatty

[Kev-o]

i mean where did the people go if a plane didn't hit the pentagon, WHERE DID IT GO?

[TheShrike]

You get one topic devoted to the subject.

ONE.

So pick, already.