At 11/2/09 02:42 PM, EagleRock wrote:
At 11/2/09 03:57 AM, Coop83 wrote:
Yeah, this was kind of how I felt in 2004. I know 1 strike is closer than 1 win, but to throw a series away from 3-0 up against your biggest foe still stings.
MUST you keep bringing that up?? :-P
I'm hoping to go a long way towards exorcising the ghosts of that series tomorrow night ;)
He's proven that he can hit in pressure situations and he's looking dangerous at the moment. He's done it all, including getting hit by a pitch 3 times in 2 nights. What the hell was that umpiring farce about last night? I thought that they warned the benches when A-Rod got drilled and as a result, when Lidge hit Tex, I thought he was out of there for sure.
Yeah, but i still think that second hit was unintentional. Fishy, maybe, but I doubt it was on purpose. Even Girardi didn't bother to argue it.
Saying the Phils didn't intend to hit a batter (especially Blanton's offering that found A-Rod's shoulder) is like saying the Yankees don't intend to win the Championship.
However, I think AJ Burnett is probably the best pitcher to go up against him at this point. When Burnett is in the zone, he's damn near unhittable. When he sucks, though, he SUCKS.
And he would have pitched like the latter, last night.
At 11/2/09 11:18 PM, EternitySpent wrote:
At 11/2/09 10:20 PM, MultiCanimefan wrote:
You know what, Burnett, now that you've pitched ike it, go play golf until Spring.
It's not Burnett's fault, it's Girardi's for continuously rolling his starters on short rest, eventually it's going to backfire. Particularly when you are up 3-1 in the series.
I'd rather lose game 5 when we're in the driving seat with this tactic, than if we were tied at 2 before. It was worth a roll of the dice, but personally, I feel that we should go with Gaudin for this next start - I'm not sure I trust Pettitte on short rest.
Speaking of which, some more announcer douchebaggery tonight. The incident that stood out this time was when they were commenting on how the Yankees have only utilized 3 starters this post-season, and they give the tidbit of information that the Atlanta Braves of the 90's were the last team to only use 3 starters in the playoffs. The colour commentator was like: "I don't know who those guys were, but they didn't win..."
I was just like... are you fucking serious?
Maddux. Smoltz. Glavine.
Actually, you're wrong. It was Smoltz, Glavine and Steve Avery. Greg Maddux didn't join the Braves until 1993.
I guess It's understandable that he didn't know what he was talking about, it's not like they're potential hall of famers or anything. Learn something about the fucking game before you condescendingly expound your faggotry on national... international television.
When you're colour commentating on International television and you're not sure, it's always best to let the guys in the truck with Google look it up first ;)
At 11/3/09 12:15 AM, phileeguy wrote:
Interesting that the new Yankee stadium will see a Champion crowned on their field in it's first year of play.
A good point - we've seen a lot of firsts in that ball park this year. A World Championship for us would kind of be the icing on the cake.
Unfortunately I didn't think the Phils would be the team, and I still don't. Although they've been the best road team in the major league this year and they've already won 3 of 5 of the games they've played there, I don't see them winning 2 in a row.
Regardless of whether or not you do, you're very worthy champions of the National League. Bearing in mind that I've only really been watching the World Series since 1999, this is the best one that I've seen and it's certainly been entertaining.
They've got to have so many things go right for them, and they need to pray that using Pettitte and then Sabathia successively - both of whom are on 3 days rest - works out in the Phils favor.
I can't personally see that happening, but that could be me just having wishful thinking. Tex and Cano have been quiet, when it comes to the bats, so perhaps it's their turns to break out?