At 8/1/09 08:10 AM, Coop83 wrote:
Glad that you're happy about it - I'll wait to reserve judgement, as he did live at PETCO, which is a hitter's graveyard, to be honest.
I know that pitchers don't play every game at home, but it's the best place to judge them, don't you think?
Peavy career splits:
Home - 45-31, 4 CG, 1 SHO, 2.83 ERA, 1.09 WHIP, .219 BAA, 3.67 K:BB ratio (779 Ks to 212 BBs), 51 HR
Away - 47-37, 3 CG, 2 SHO, 3.84 ERA, 1.30 WHIP, .246 BAA, 2.55 K:BB ratio (569 Ks to 223 BBs), 84 HR
So there is definitely a slight uptick in playing outside of Petco. The W-L is about the same, but he's roughly a run higher in ERA, almost 40 points higher in BAA, garners far fewer Ks, and has allowed 33 more homers.
Plus, he's now pitching half his games at US Cellular, a hitter's park, and he's facing AL hitting (granted, the AL Central is not the East, but it's not the NL West, either). He's never pitched at US Cellular before, otherwise I'd throw those stats your way.
In other news, can someone please fucking get rid of Dusty Baker now? It's more than obvious that he's a piss-poor excuse for a manger, yet somehow NL teams continue to think it a good idea to bring him on board. He's now ruined the prized arms of Kerry Wood, Matt Clement, Mark Prior, Jerome Williams, and Edinson Volquez. On top of that, he doesn't even believe in the usage of OBP/OPS and other sabermetric statistics as a means of adjusting lineups/rotations/bullpens. Maybe that's why his dumb ass had Corey Patterson patrolling center field for more than half of last year.
For real though. Let's break this down for a second. If you have a player with a high OBP (say, .400 or better), you want him in the lineup over a guy with an OBP that's lower (say, .300 or so), right? Even if the one with the high OBP is a slow runner (a la Adam Dunn, over-35-Barry-Bonds, etc.), because he's more likely to get on base through a walk, HBP, or a hit than the guy with a low OBP (for example, Neifi Perez, Corey Patterson, etc.).
However, Dusty seems to think that if they're not fast, then they're merely "clogging up the bases", which literally makes my head hurt trying to conceive what the fuck he is thinking when he says that. It's really very basic: High OBP players = better likelihood of getting players on base; more players on base = more improved chances to score runs; more runs = better likelihood of winning games, even games where the pitching falters.
Yet somehow, for Dusty, putting slow, high OBP guys in the lineup actually means sacrificing runs, because they're slow and (I guess this is his thinking) more likely to make an out on base. However, if you don't put low-OBP players in the lineup in the first place (especially since it generally correlates to having a low average, as well), you're less likely to have players frequently grounding out and causing forces at 2nd/3rd/home, or grounding into DPs.
But that doesn't matter, because Dusty is "old-school" (read: fucking stupid), and faster players always means better chances at scoring runs...even when the fast players can't hit at all (Joey Gathright, Corey Patterson, Willy Taveras, etc.).
Fuck Dusty Baker.