Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/27/07 09:52 AM, bcdemon wrote: Why does it seem that every time Gee Dubya opens his yap, oil prices go up?

Satan? Testing our faith?

Thursday he placed new sanctions on Iran (Revolutionary Guard to be exact), Friday oil prices jumped to over $92 a barrel. Maybe if we Duct Taped his mouth shut we could see oil prices drop.

That and my blood pressure.

At 10/14/07 01:15 PM, GaiusIuliusTaberna wrote:

At 10/13/07 01:23 PM, tony4moroney wrote: fucking pwnage

Thank you Toney for your conspiracy theory of the day. How's that anal probe and tin foil hat treating you? Still under government surveillance?

It's not his conspiracy theory. It is, however, fucking pwnage.

At 10/27/07 07:40 PM, SlithVampir wrote: Satan? Testing our faith?

Yes! HAIL SATAN!!!!

At 10/27/07 08:37 AM, SlithVampir wrote:

At 6/29/04 01:35 PM, Bubba-Phat wrote: I suggest that all of you see Fareinhet 9/11.

A can of worms you don't want to open on this forum

I just wanted to point out you quoted a 3-year-old post. Lol. I find that funny for some reason ^.^

At 10/29/07 11:29 AM, InsaniMaster471 wrote: I find that funny for some reason ^.^

Yeah... I don't update the links on my favs list much

At 10/29/07 03:50 PM, SlithVampir wrote: Yeah... I don't update the links on my favs list much

*scratches head* I don't get it. What's the joke?

At 10/29/07 11:29 AM, InsaniMaster471 wrote: I just wanted to point out you quoted a 3-year-old post. Lol. I find that funny for some reason ^.^

You can't lose a debate if your opponent left 3 years ago.

For the record, the war is against all terrorism activity and those who harbour it. The media being bias @$$ holes did not report that while no weapons of mass destruction were found that nearly completed warheads were. Saddam was threatening his enemies with these warheads that he didn't have before we considered going into Iraq. It also appears that now Iran was indeed helping supply the neccessary fissionable material, even before recently trying to build their own reactor. Yes they just tried to build a reactor but Israeli Air Force took the opportunity to bomb it. They've covered it up by now but it was there. You don't beleive me, grow a brain and try looking at the governemnt reports yourself before you jump on the idealistic pinko bandwagon. God is it that hard for you guys? They are available on the internet.

At 10/29/07 11:52 PM, crazy-eye2 wrote: They are available on the internet.

Right next to ZeitGeist.

At 10/29/07 11:52 PM, crazy-eye2 wrote: For the record, the war is against all terrorism activity and those who harbour it.

It is NOW. And that's only because Bush needs another reason for the war. The WMD reason failed before the war even started.

The media being bias @$$ holes did not report that while no weapons of mass destruction were found that nearly completed warheads were.

Are you going to go on and on about some sarin shells found in the desert that barely have enough harm left in them to give you the shits? Or are you going to make up some story about Saddams nuclear warheads he had under his bed?

Saddam was threatening his enemies with these warheads that he didn't have before we considered going into Iraq. It also appears that now Iran was indeed helping supply the neccessary fissionable material, even before recently trying to build their own reactor. Yes they just tried to build a reactor but Israeli Air Force took the opportunity to bomb it. They've covered it up by now but it was there. You don't beleive me, grow a brain and try looking at the governemnt reports yourself before you jump on the idealistic pinko bandwagon. God is it that hard for you guys? They are available on the internet.

Then it should simple for you to give us the links. Go ahead.

At 10/18/07 05:59 PM, JakeHero wrote: You're an idiot and Nintendo blows blue balls.

That's that fucking old-school newgrounds BBS-poster attitude I miss so much!

At 10/18/07 11:14 AM, GaiusIuliusTaberna wrote:

At 10/18/07 03:09 AM, tony4moroney wrote: "Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."

-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials

Bush becoming more aggressive towards iran, asserting that if suspected of possessing nuclear arms, there will be a third world war. The Administration is now pursuing iran similarly to the way they pursued iraq - under completely falsified pretenses.

"There is no avoiding war; it can only be postponed to the advantage of others." Niccolo Machiavelli

"Let him who desires peace prepare for war." Flavius Vegetius Renatus

"We make war that we may live in peace." Aristotle

If Iran attains nuclear arms a new cold war begins no amount of spilled blood can equal the horror of nuclear war.

Regardless of any stance president Gorge W Bush possesses he is powerless with the democrat majority in the senate so even if he develops a decisive strategy or discovers proof that Iran is a threat he can only plead for the power he once possessed you beat a dead horse and I pity you for it.

Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris
(If Ceasar were alive, you would be chained to an oar)

Thank you for Putting Quotes in your post that is a great reply and heres another one

" There is no such thing as UNWOUNDED in war"

It can be emoitonly, Phisically, and Emotionaly it depeand on the person but anyways the war on TERROR has tributed to Bush's Decline and yes he is not the best leader but there have been worse. I can't remember the President but one President went away for a 4 Week Vacations in North Dakota he was fishing during the Great Depression and this is the funny part he fished in the same lake for 4 weeks straight and he caught on average about 10 fish a day and this lake was only about 100 YDS wide and long so do they math and ask yourself how is this possible well they state spent money to put more fish in there each night so the President would bring more attention to there state and The Vice Preident was Going through the Great Depression HimSelf so Has our Gonernment turned into something that was not wanted by the first people who came here in the first place. Well this is only one example of Bad Leadership so be happy Bush is acctualy paying attention to the war and not fishing in North Dakota and for all the people who say the that Mount Rushmore would have been the thing that would contribute to there Tourism but is was in the middle of building and was by the end of the Presidents Vacation so people may not have even known about The Mount. if he didn't go there but it's everyone's Opinion. So have fun with this post

At 6/27/04 04:55 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: There's just too many new Bush topics, and after a while of thinking about it, and asking other Mods, I've decided to make the OFFICIAL Bush topic. All Bush related posts go here, on penalty of banning for up to 3 days.

If you make a Bush topic outside of this thread YOU WILL BE BANNED. If you post in an old Bush topic after this thread has been made, YOU WILL BE BANNED.

The whiny, repetitive idiocy ends here.

Thiers to wide of a variaity of stuff about bush to stuff onto one topic its rediclous....

At 10/29/07 11:52 PM, crazy-eye2 wrote: For the record, the war is against all terrorism activity and those who harbour it. The media being bias @$$ holes did not report that while no weapons of mass destruction were found that nearly completed warheads were.Saddam was threatening his enemies with these warheads that he didn't have before we considered going into Iraq. It also appears that now Iran was indeed helping supply the neccessary fissionable material, even before recently trying to build their own reactor. Yes they just tried to build a reactor but Israeli Air Force took the opportunity to bomb it. They've covered it up by now but it was there. You don't beleive me, grow a brain and try looking at the governemnt reports yourself before you jump on the idealistic pinko bandwagon. God is it that hard for you guys? They are available on the internet.

OK here i go:
A. Why do we go after Saddam who we THINK has WMDs instead of Kim Jong Il who we KNOW has WMD's
B.Wait a second youre talking about the FOX news bias, right?
C. Iran supplying Iraq??? You do know that those two countries are sworn enemies and hate each other completely???
D. I would look at the government reports but im afraid of going to Gitmo and getting tourtured!!!

I'm sorry but the war was in the wrong place and at the wrong time and now the situation wont be repaired for decades to come.

At 11/4/07 12:23 AM, ntrokel wrote:

OK here i go:

Go for it.

A. Why do we go after Saddam who we THINK has WMDs instead of Kim Jong Il who we KNOW has WMD's

Kim Jong may have WMDs, but where did he gain that capability?

Clinton.

Also, if we did invade N. Korea, what would the left be saying? "He didn't have anything to do with 9/11".

And considering Saddam attempted to assassinate former President Bush, i'd say that war have been started for much less.

B.Wait a second youre talking about the FOX news bias, right?

All news is Bias.

C. Iran supplying Iraq??? You do know that those two countries are sworn enemies and hate each other completely???

Iran is a shiite state who trains Shia militias.

Considering that if the US were to lose in Iraq (which seems much less likely everyday) Iran could capitalize on the moment and befriend Iraq and attempt to take control.

D. I would look at the government reports but im afraid of going to Gitmo and getting tourtured!!!

I'm sorry but the war was in the wrong place and at the wrong time and now the situation wont be repaired for decades to come.

WELL. This is a face I haven't seen in a while.

At 11/4/07 01:36 AM, Memorize wrote:

At 11/4/07 12:23 AM, ntrokel wrote:

Kim Jong may have WMDs, but where did he gain that capability?

Clinton.

Wow. You took "blame Clinton" to new heights. Arming Kim Jong Il. Definite citation needed.

And considering Saddam attempted to assassinate former President Bush, i'd say that war have been started for much less.

Like the Crusades for example! I guess that's the level of efficiency Bush was going for.

B.Wait a second youre talking about the FOX news bias, right?

All news is Bias.

True

Iran is a shiite state who trains Shia militias.

True again. This is because there is no Iraq. It is a figment of our imagination. There are only Sunni, Shia, Kurd. That is all anyone cares about. Iraq has existed for 93(about) years. There are people who were alive to remember its creation. Islam has been fighting within itself since before the Vikings.

(which seems much less likely everyday)

Joking?

D. I would look at the government reports but im afraid of going to Gitmo and getting tourtured!!!\

Its OK. You have to be Arab for the government to keep you there.

I'm sorry but the war was in the wrong place and at the wrong time and now the situation wont be repaired for decades to come.

Yup. And now you understand.

At 6/27/04 05:11 PM, RedSkunk wrote: bush sux

I know!!!! I mean good god!!!!!! Bush should burn in hell were he belongs!!!

Check out my account page, ive got like 10 big assed topics about 9/11 from that one website, look on my account page for it cuz ill prolly get in trouble for saying it here.

At 11/4/07 07:52 AM, noobkiller3195 wrote: I know!!!! I mean good god!!!!!! Bush should burn in hell were he belongs!!!

O RLY?

At 11/4/07 07:40 AM, SlithVampir wrote:

At 11/4/07 01:36 AM, Memorize wrote:

Kim Jong may have WMDs, but where did he gain that capability?

Clinton.

Wow. You took "blame Clinton" to new heights. Arming Kim Jong Il. Definite citation needed.

I think Memorize is mixing up things. Jimmy Carter is the reason why North Korea has prospered militarily up until this point, while Clinton is responsible for gutting our military and providing the Chinese with the means to produce many more nuclear weapons.

Its OK. You have to be Arab for the government to keep you there.

I wish...
The Us government kept a couple of british nationals in Guantanamo for several months and toprtured them before they were released...

At 11/4/07 03:01 PM, chocolate-penguin wrote:

At 11/4/07 12:23 AM, ntrokel wrote:

At 10/29/07 11:52 PM, crazy-eye2 wrote:

OK here i go:
A. Why do we go after Saddam who we THINK has WMDs instead of Kim Jong Il who we KNOW has WMD's

Not a threat. He would also not be willing to cooperate with Al Qaeda and had nothing to do with 9/11.

Yes but he is a very anti-American state and if another terrorist group that hates the US (there a quite a few) was going to attack the USA the North Koreans just might "misplace" one of their warheads.

B.Wait a second youre talking about the FOX news bias, right?

Mindless babble. I hate how leftists only target Fox News even when they aren't even that biased, they're just the only conservative national TV news network out there.

Alright maybe I was a little out of bounds with this...

C. Iran supplying Iraq??? You do know that those two countries are sworn enemies and hate each other completely???

Stupidest SHIT I've ever heard. You know absolutely nothing about Middle Eastern history if you think that Iran would not help Iraqi insurgents right now.

Why?

Iran hated SADDAM and SADDAMS government. They had many wars and all were bloody, they were also totally fruitless. Neither side gained anything and the wars were long stalemates.

Saddam is dead, the government totally totally dismantled. Iran is supplying insurgents who are religious fanatics fighting eachother and the US itself. It has been PROVEN that Iran is smuggling IEDs and weapons to militias and religious factions.

Dude the post which I was replying to said that Iran was supplying Saddam. I understand that they would supply the insurgents but the original post saids Iran was supplying Iraq under Hussien.

D. I would look at the government reports but im afraid of going to Gitmo and getting tourtured!!!

Oh wow. Funny, original, and totally factual. Not. Fucking idiot. I hate how you think the people have "TEH WRITE TO KNO!11SHIFTONE1!!1" about all government involvement no matter how little you are really involved and how it would jeopardize national security.

OK fine Ill just ignore the US constitution being torn to shreds in front of my eyes and wait until i can get arrested for even thinking about being anti-Bush.

I'm sorry but the war was in the wrong place and at the wrong time and now the situation wont be repaired for decades to come.

Why are you so sure of it being decades? Oh, no reason. You just WANT to, right?

THe country of Iraq was never supposed to be there. The British created it after WWI and lumped three groups of people together who hated each other. The sunnis, the kurds, and the shi'ites. The only thing that has kept the country together until now is an oprresive dictator who crushed all civil unrest. A democracy will be unable to do this and the century old fighting between these groups will start again. If you think that can be solved quickly you should tell the department of state because they'd REALLY like to know.

At 11/4/07 06:18 PM, ntrokel wrote:

them before they were released...

They were released. Could have been worse.

"the hardest thing I've ever had to do was connect the war on terrorism to Iraq."
The words of 'Dubya' himself.

At 11/4/07 07:40 AM, SlithVampir wrote:

Wow. You took "blame Clinton" to new heights. Arming Kim Jong Il. Definite citation needed.

He gave them a nuclear facility for power.

Just look at how that turned out.

Like the Crusades for example! I guess that's the level of efficiency Bush was going for.

How you managed to compare completely seperate issues, is beyond me.

hmm, i dunno if i replied to this psot before but there seems to be waaaaay too many little kids or retarded immature 40 year olds who like to post insignificant replies here to let everyone know they regret ever being born and being sorry for anyone ever having to listen to their shit. Take that bitch, and dont try to turn it back on me cuz ur a fucking loser if you do.

George Bush, not America is the problem, him and his psychopathic followers, they all need to be taken the fuck out for what they did on 9/11.
Ive had some annoying little shits on my 9/11 post n frankly im tired of it, people need to......
I cant even find the words to describe this, people going onto a serious discussion and replying with smart assed comments about typing n how I dont have proof about what im talkin about.
I dont fucking need proof, you fuckers are the people going pms on me about saying the president n his fuckbuddies are personaly responsible for every death on 9/11 and in Iraq or wherever the fuck theyre at now.

Im fucking sick of people warping a serious topic into somthing totaly retarded.
If you fuckign have proof that Im wrong than fucking show me!!
Until I see documents by people other than people paid to write them, explaining how there were soooo many fucking ways we could doubt the oficial story of 9/11 as accidents and coincidences, Im not gona listen to a god damn word your saying!

I have my reasons for believing shit and so do you, so dont come on my post and start up a buncha shit about me being stupid for wanting others to try and find the truth.

The shit these fuckers are doing n saying on my post are evil little fucktards who dont have the courage to speak for themselves, n i may be going overboard by writing mroe cuz im sure i got the point across so im jus gona stop now. Im just so fucking angry at these people who have no consideration and no maturity whatsoever, Another thing, if your going to reply on ym topic, put somthing good in there, maybe somthing that I havent heard other than some rant by a 12 year old girl whos going through puberty.
I dont approve of that shit!

At 11/5/07 10:55 PM, Shaggytheclown17 wrote:

George Bush, not America is the problem, him and his psychopathic followers, they all need to be taken the fuck out for what they did on 9/11.

It's people like you that make me call bullshit on the study that claims the "smarter" states voted for Kerry.

Because although it may or may not be true that the lesser educated will vote for Bush, the conspiracy nuts (who have no education at all) would vote for Kerry.

I cant even find the words to describe this, people going onto a serious discussion and replying with smart assed comments about typing n how I dont have proof about what im talkin about.

The fact that you can't spell worth a damn shows we have no reason to take you seriously. If you can't take the time to spell-check your shit and type out "And" instead of "n" then I've got no problem ignoring your ass.....

Bush sucks, true. America's the problem cause it took a couple million people to vote him into office.

At 11/5/07 04:54 PM, Memorize wrote:

At 11/4/07 07:40 AM, SlithVampir wrote:

Wow. You took "blame Clinton" to new heights. Arming Kim Jong Il. Definite citation needed.

He gave them a nuclear facility for power.

Just look at how that turned out.

CITATION NEEDED! And not anywhere with an apparent bias. I wouldn't cite the Huffington post.

How you managed to compare completely seperate issues, is beyond me.

Me too.

At 11/6/07 07:47 AM, SlithVampir wrote:

CITATION NEEDED! And not anywhere with an apparent bias. I wouldn't cite the Huffington post.

I gurantee it wouldn't matter what I gave you, you would claim it was bias.

Because that's the type of person you are.