Voting

[evey36]

Who are you more likely to vote for this election and why?

[Edvin]

Okay, if i was an american citizen i would vote for kerry even if he's boring and doesnt do shit, Bush is a retard (in my opinion) ! Anyways, thinkfor a second, if u had Bush and Kerry in the "finals" of the 2004 election, anyone who hates Bush will vote Kerry !

[TheIneffable666]

I think the best way to show my opinion is by linking you to the site

www.johnkerryisadouchebagbutvoteforhimanyway.com

[TheIneffable666]

Sorry wrong link,

www.johnkerryisadouchebagbutimvotingforhimanyway.com

[cripg187]

yea bring clinton back he would just drop a bomb over iran.
what getting pissed cuz im bring up old shit?

[Raptorman]

At 6/30/04 04:25 AM, cripg187 wrote: yea bring clinton back he would just drop a bomb over iran.
what getting pissed cuz im bring up old shit?

Nah, bring George Clinton back to drop Da Bomb and tear the roof off the sucka!

[DeathSimian]

Best URL ever.

[RedSkunk]

David Cobb

[ReiperX]

I'll probally end up voting for Senator Kerry just for the fact that I want to get rid of President Bush because he hasn't done much to help the nation in my opinion and has done a lot to hurt it.

I just hope Senator Kerry does a better job than President Bush, hopefully he will.

[niffweed17]

At 7/2/04 12:45 AM, ReiperX wrote: I'll probally end up voting for Senator Kerry just for the fact that I want to get rid of President Bush because he hasn't done much to help the nation in my opinion and has done a lot to hurt it.

I just hope Senator Kerry does a better job than President Bush, hopefully he will.

ANYBODY could do a better job than bush. a dead rooster could do a better job than bush.

hell, al sharpton could do better than bush.

[Camarohusky]

Im with Raptorman here, I think P-funk would kick the funk out of all the other candidates.

[Brown-Hat]

Too young to vote but if i did it'd be for Nader. Kerry is little more than a Bush-Lite. Uber-rich, dines with megacorporations, a less than liberal voting record. Hardly the champion of the common man a Democrat candidate should be. And almost as weak as Bush himself.

Vote Green, everything the Democrats used to be and more.

Besides, underdogs rule.

[Camarohusky]

At 7/2/04 07:23 AM, Brown_Hat wrote: Too young to vote but if i did it'd be for Nader. Kerry is little more than a Bush-Lite. Uber-rich, dines with megacorporations, a less than liberal voting record. Hardly the champion of the common man a Democrat candidate should be. And almost as weak as Bush himself.

Vote Green, everything the Democrats used to be and more.

Besides, underdogs rule.

Maybe you're too young to remember 4 years ago...
Wasnt Ralph Nader a big part of getting Bush into ofice, now all conservatives will say no, cause they don't know shit. But he was. Just think, if Nader hadn't run last time... No Iraq war, No record deficit and so on. Sometimes it's better to compromise and take one for the team than it is to vote for your ideology. Like the website says "Kerry is a douchbag but I'm voting for him anyways."

[Pilot-Doofy]

At 6/27/04 05:28 AM, Edvin1412 wrote: Okay, I suck cock

Dude, you look like a peacock. But anyway, I wouldn't vote for Kerry because he is a democratic celebrity cock sucking piece of trash. I'm so tired of them wanting to equalize everything, they want everyone to be just as wealthy as everyone else, if that was the case why do we go to college to get good jobs if dropouts get just as much money?

I really feel like democrats must have brainwashed people into believing that their views of total and utter bullshit.

[mabzie]

Michael Badnarik (L)

http://www.badnarik.org/

[RedSkunk]

At 7/2/04 07:23 AM, Brown_Hat wrote: Vote Green,

Nader is running independent. David Cobb is the Green candidate

At 7/2/04 02:05 PM, Camarohusky wrote: Wasnt Ralph Nader a big part of getting Bush into ofice.

No. Gore's shitty campaign was a big part of Bush getting into office. Oh, and money.

[IllustriousPotentate]

At 7/2/04 11:28 PM, red_skunk wrote:

At 7/2/04 02:05 PM, Camarohusky wrote: Wasnt Ralph Nader a big part of getting Bush into ofice.

No. Gore's shitty campaign was a big part of Bush getting into office. Oh, and money.

Exactly. Nader has even admitted it himself that his support came from both sides of the aisle, but primarily for people who wouldn't have voted otherwise.

[RedSkunk]

At 7/2/04 11:46 PM, IllustriousPotentate wrote: Exactly. Nader has even admitted it himself that his support came from both sides of the aisle, but primarily for people who wouldn't have voted otherwise.

Nader / 3rd parties like Green's pull in some conservative / libertarian people, but yeah, he's going to get more 'Dems' than 'Repubs'. But it's all pointless - you can't blame a third party for someone losing. Bush took away more votes from Gore than Nader did.

And illustrious.. why... nascar? come onnnnnn

I could spruce it up at least =P

[IllustriousPotentate]

At 7/2/04 11:59 PM, red_skunk wrote:

And illustrious.. why... nascar? come onnnnnn

Because I'm a huge fan. I have every NASCAR Nextel (formerly Winston) Cup race from September 2001 on I was able to record recorded on either VHS tape or DVD. I've got about 100 races stored in some sort of fashion.

I'm also out to show that NASCAR isn't a bunch of dumb rednecks.

[pierrot-le-fou]

As much as i don't want to say it, i have to say Bush.

And now i'll defend my reason's why. Kerry hasn't taken a solid stand on anything in his entire life, you can't have a president who's going to go off a wim or a feeling and then turn around and go, "Hmmm, what if i did this?" Bush has a plan, even if the plan is to make me poorer and possibly get the draft reinstated. Its very possible that things might start turning around for the better economically if Bush stays in office, and you never know when the iraqi war will end. However the former are on the miracle end of the wishlist.

[Camarohusky]

At 7/3/04 12:11 AM, pierrot-le-fou wrote: As much as i don't want to say it, i have to say Bush.

And yet that is a picture of Lenin in your profile... tsk tsk...

[Fabs]

if i was a us citizen i would vot for kerry!!! one has to be retarded to vote for bush!!! if ur not convinced who to vote chek out this submission:
u are a fucking moron: gorge w. bush

[witeshark]

At 7/3/04 12:11 AM, pierrot-le-fou wrote:

i'll defend my reason's why. Kerry hasn't taken a solid stand on anything in his entire life,

This is very close to how I see it

[IllustriousPotentate]

At 7/2/04 11:59 PM, red_skunk wrote: But it's all pointless - you can't blame a third party for someone losing.

You are right. You could just as easily blame Gore for Nader losing. Or blame everyone for Lyndon LaRouche losing.

Bush took away more votes from Gore than Nader did.

Not really. No one actually "takes" votes from anybody. Nader did not force anyone to vote for him; he did not entice people to vote for him despite their intentions to vote for Gore. People voted for him because they felt he was the best man for the job.

The premise that third parties "cost" major parties elections like others have been suggesting functions on a "what if"--namely, what if the third party would not have entered.

[Camarohusky]

I'm for Kerry, with Bush's rash decisions and multiple unilateral actions, he has turned a once ideological young person, into one who beleives that no matter how hard he tries, he re cannot have an effect on what the president really does... Bush might as well be king for as little as he takes the people into account... (Whigs reborn?)

[IllustriousPotentate]

At 7/3/04 12:24 AM, Camarohusky wrote: multiple unilateral actions

I challenge you to name a single unilateral action that Bush has undertaken.

[witeshark]

At 7/3/04 12:27 AM, IllustriousPotentate wrote: I challenge you to name a single unilateral action that Bush has undertaken.

Really, what as a leader would you do in Bush's place on the critical ones matey?

[Turro]

PLEASE

Don't vote for Bush!

[IllustriousPotentate]

At 7/3/04 12:35 AM, witeshark wrote:

Really, what as a leader would you do in Bush's place on the critical ones matey?

I'm not sure as to what you are trying to say. Is this a rhetorical question, or are you desiring a response? If so, please rephrase the question.

[RedSkunk]

At 7/3/04 12:23 AM, IllustriousPotentate wrote: Not really. No one actually "takes" votes from anybody.

Yes, ok. That statement was in response to anyone who believes that it's possible to "take" votes away from a candidate. I agree with you though.

At 7/3/04 12:27 AM, IllustriousPotentate wrote: I challenge you to name a single unilateral action that Bush has undertaken.

Semantics are a bitch. I can't think of anything offhand that was purely unilateral.