At 12/26/16 01:05 PM, ValterValyun wrote:
As much you have some points there, I'll have to disagree.
When building a portfolio, you will always have to keep your work up-to-date. Keeping up your old work just for the sake of "nostalgia" will just speak your work as "out-dated."
When dealing with clientele work, they will expect your current skill level, and seeing old work, regardless of how good quality it is, will reflect poorly on yourself.
But I don't mean to get rid of your work entirely -- I always keep back-ups of my old work and shove it somewhere just in case I'll reminiscence the past.
As a designer I do know the worth of a portfolio, and it's true you need to showcase your best work, but I wouldn't say you need to get rid of your old work because of it. I respect designers that are proud of how they've evolved over time, and show both their old work and new. It goes to show you have a passion for what you do (that you've done a lot), and that you keep improving. It's just not the type of content you place on the main page so it'll be the first impression potential clients get. Let people see the best stuff first, and dig deeper if they want more. And if you do use NG as a portfolio, the better stuff is on top by default.
I wouldn't say NG is most suited for a traditional design portfolio though The 'clients' you might get here are either regular users who follow you overtime, and are looking for commissions, or other regular users/studios that wish to collaborate in some way. The application process is different here, and I believe trophies and fan counts are at the top of the list when it comes to available merits, if that's the type of content you make, rather than your content history.
For artists who make a living off of their creative craft, and keep putting out things consistently, quantity also means increased exposure and profitability. You rarely see the really popular artists removing their past work. A lot of their old content still draws in views, and IMO it shows they're human: that they were once upon an amateur, just like anyone else. Maybe they simply don't remove the old stuff because they don't have time, but I'd like to think they also realize there's a value in it, not just for them but for the viewers. And as long as they're putting out new stuff, the old is not what'll form users overall impressions of them.
You might stumble upon old and sub-par work by great artists, but if you do some research on said artist (like 'view more') you'll realize it's old and sub-par, and be impressed at the new. And if you don't, then no loss. The artist gets a view; the viewer leaves. Hadn't that particular piece been around they probably wouldn't have seen your work anyway.
Old work serves a purpose, to me. It's nostalgia, but it's more. It's history. It's change. It's like a behind-the-scenes over the ebb and flow of time, and when it's by artists I admire, it's more content. Bad or no, I appreciate a surplus. To me, that's how NG works best, and those are the users I admire most. It seems we use this place differently though. I respect your approach, but I'd still be sad if I see some of your work, and then come back and see that it's gone. Like any good form of content - like a movie you might want to watch more than once, if it served a purpose when it was made, then it'll surely serve one again, and it'll only be a benefit to have around. That's what I believe.