At 12/15/16 01:35 AM, Sekhem wrote:
not to denigrate myself or the ng userbase, but it's not the most academic place
I don't feel bad about it and I'll go ahead and say it. Newgrounds, like many other websites on the Internet, is filled with a great percentage of people suffering from severe Dunning-Kruger effect.
You'll notice this especially with anyone who feels the need to chime in some negative remark about the college-educated (because they themselves were not college-educated, and likely not even high-school educated), yet they consider their knowledge and expertise to be better than that of actual experts, whom they will argue endlessly with. This will also "prove" (only in their minds) that they were "right" since the college-educated expert they are arguing with indeed now will look down on them (not because they lack college education -- their erroneous cognitive-biased reasoning as to the "why", but, rather because when one speaks from a position of pure ignorance, those who have the requisite knowledge see right through it, but unfortunately others may not, so they may mislead some.)
Put it this way. A college education isn't going to guarantee you'll get better people, but the averages will be better because it does serve at the very least as a very basic intelligence filter. The average college-educated person has a higher intelligence than the average person who lacks a college education. You can also filter further based on difficulty of degree and also how far they went and how prestigious of an institution they earned their degrees from.
Again, averages though. So that's not to say you won't have people even who lack any education who are more intelligent than anyone else, or that you won't have some educated idiot, but the averages say these filters do lead to a higher caliber of people.
Also some forums do grant authority/etc based on actual rank and academic achievement. So if some idiot was arguing with a professor, the professor could ban them, for example, if he was actually registered as what he says he was, and showed proof.
I both like and dislike that model though, and here's why. I like that model in the fact that it eliminates a lot of the stupidity you'll otherwise encounter by granting actual perks to higher IRL rank. I dislike that model in the fact that, if you are to prove who you actually are in enough detail such that they know and have proof of your actual qualifications, you forfeit a lot of privacy rights, which are also valuable. And it would be very difficult to implement such a system anonymously, which would be the ideal.