At 6/18/16 11:21 AM, Feoric wrote: Yeah we should all probably start using 4chan syntax

First of all, it's not an exclusively 4chan thing, I mostly use one imageboard and it's not even one of the really popular ones so trying to associate me with it won't work. I actually wanted to use greytext but it wound't contrast.
Secondly, I'd much rather use chan lingo than spout Reddit-tier arguments.

and post unfunny image macros like you,

Ya chuckled, don't lie to me.

noted great poster who loves national socialism

citation needed

and thinks gay people cause suicide.

citation needed

At 6/18/16 11:49 AM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote:

Yeah I'm gonna do just that, some people on this forum are at least somewhat reasonable but I can see they're not a majority. I won't reply to any more posts in this thread, i can see they're thirsty.

At 6/18/16 12:29 PM, Radaketor wrote: I won't reply to any more posts in this thread, i can see they're thirsty.

I'm happy to be a scapegoat you can use to cease the humiliation of yourself with your own posts.

At 6/18/16 12:33 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote: Thirsty is a good word for it. I'm more sure than ever blocking him months ago was a good idea, considering how much of a dick he is being to you

Wow, am I too politically incorrect even for this weathered black knight? Have I been censored by the champion of anti-progressive censorship? Somebody give me a fucking medal!

At 6/18/16 11:21 AM, Feoric wrote: Yeah we should all probably start using 4chan syntax and post unfunny image macros like you, noted great poster who loves national socialism and thinks gay people cause suicide.

Don't forget making up fake quotes from the other person and then responding to those quotes instead of the actual content of what the other person said. That's crucial.

And then of course there's the most important rule of argumentation, which is that any statement is valid and equal to all other statements and can never be wrong or disputed as long as you say "it's just my personal opinion" afterwards. I think that one comes from Aristotle.

At 6/18/16 02:39 PM, lapis wrote: I'm struggling to see what the purpose of this thread was supposed be. "I don't care if people are gay, I just want to give them a certain negative label that I, when pressed, will even deny was meant to be negative at all, and anyway it's just my opinion so shut up".

Was thinking the same thing. What exactly is the purpose of this thread? "Homosexuality isn't a bad thing, but I have to lable it somehow". Ok, fine. And now what?

At 6/14/16 07:52 AM, Radaketor wrote: ... it's not normal.

I think we can all agree that being gay isn't the work of the devil or something we should blame, kill, harass, harm people for, in my opinion it's nature's way of keeping population down and under control for certain species but it can also have origins on how someone's raised, how they perceive the world and etc, you don't need to agree with me on why some people are gay so long as we can all agree on the first part about it not being intrinsically evil.

But is being a homosexual normal?
I don't think so and here's why; like i said above, to me it's a way to keep down populations of beings if they're getting too out of hand, if a country has 10 people and that's somehow draining their resources, if two or three people are born gay that'll help the next generation be smaller than the latter (assuming everyone had at least one child) and not drain their resources, but homosexuality is never the norm, the norm when it comes to people's sexuality, the default if you will, is in fact straight.
So should that small group of people be discriminated against? Of course not, but they also shouldn't be commended or thought that it's normal, especially because they can't reproduce without the opposite gender, making them the odd-man in any group of people. People who feel sexually attracted to the same gender are about as normal to the general population as an albino child is to a mostly black family.

Thoughts?

well I don't think it's normal, but mostly a gray area. The matter of fact is that it's said by conditioning and religion, mostly, because of the adam and eve story. If people feel attracted to a different gender altogether could mean that they might be homosexual, but real people like that are much more scarce than what mainstream scene might have you believe. I for one had thoughts about my own sexuality a few years ago and I didn't find anything wrong with homosexual people, I even migneld with them and they were respectful to me the whole time, but I didn't feel attracted to another one of the same gender. Regardless, I also haven't been much successful with members of the opposite sex anyways so it's kinda of a draw. In fact, all that matters is if you are good with yourself, then if you want to be homosexual or not, it's entirely up to you, as long as its a real desire and not seeking somebody elses approval.

At 7/4/16 12:12 AM, hektikmusic wrote: The thing that always struck me as odd is that many homosexuals make that fact the core of their identity.

And heterosexuals do not? Give me a break.

It degenerates depending on who you are with, not always but it can. Other than that its ok i guess

At 7/4/16 11:39 PM, hektikmusic wrote: Um yeah, we don't. If I used 10 words to describe myself "straight", "heterosexual", and "cis-gendered" wouldn't come up even though I am those things. I don't go to straight pride parades and I don't speak in fabricated accent used to distinguish myself as straight.

You may not use the term "straight" but instead say "I like titties." America is obsessed with straight sex. Listen to music. It's about straight sex. Look at fashion, it's about looking sexy to the opposite sex. Carer goals are often about straight sex. TV is about straight sex. We straight people define ourselves heavily through heterosexual sex. However, seeing as hetero sex is considered normal, we don't feel the need to use the term "straight" to define ourselves.

At 7/4/16 11:39 PM, hektikmusic wrote:

At 7/4/16 04:12 PM, Camarohusky wrote:

At 7/4/16 12:12 AM, hektikmusic wrote: The thing that always struck me as odd is that many homosexuals make that fact the core of their identity.

And heterosexuals do not? Give me a break.

Um yeah, we don't.

What's this "we" shit? My sexuality is definitely a big part of my identity! I don't even know you and I feel like talking about pretty girls all night with you.

At 7/4/16 11:39 PM, hektikmusic wrote:

At 7/4/16 04:12 PM, Camarohusky wrote:

At 7/4/16 12:12 AM, hektikmusic wrote: The thing that always struck me as odd is that many homosexuals make that fact the core of their identity.

And heterosexuals do not? Give me a break.

Um yeah, we don't.

You must have had one hell of a boring experience in college.

At 7/6/16 04:01 AM, hektikmusic wrote: And clearly it's famously known that many gay people adopt the lisp as a way to belong to something, like their own language of sorts so stfu

You could say a similar thing for a multitude of perceived "hetero" cultures, like, say, frat boys, who are not known for their piety (which is perceived to be true or it wouldn't continuously be a perpetuated stereotype, in your words). Maybe different groups have different ways of expressing shared components of their identity, such as sexuality? Seems a little crazy, I know.

At 7/6/16 04:01 AM, hektikmusic wrote: I already have 2 kids with a 3rd on the way but I guess doing the normal thing is somehow flaunting my sexuality.

You totally answered your own question and didn't even realize it. Doing the "Normal" thing. When heterosexual sex is considered normal, merely flaunting your heterosexual exploits is flauting your sexuality. Just because most people are like you doesn't take away that fact.

Strange way of looking at it, but interesting...

What about bisexuals and transgenders?