At 7/31/16 01:09 PM, Amaranthus wrote: I feel incredibly bad.

Just give it back. No harm no foul.

At 8/1/16 05:21 PM, Sense-Offender wrote: This is the most awesome thread.

Yes, you can nominate yourself. Sense-Offender has been nominated.

At 8/1/16 05:21 PM, Sense-Offender wrote:

At 8/1/16 05:21 PM, Sense-Offender wrote: This is the most awesome thread.

Are you nominating this thread for most awesome thread?

Yes, you can confirm yourself.
Sense-Offender has been confirmed.

Get all your nominations in while you can.

At 8/2/16 04:53 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:

At 8/1/16 05:21 PM, Sense-Offender wrote: This is the most retarded fucking thread.

Yes, you can color with me. DoctorStrongbad has been evaluated.

At 8/1/16 05:21 PM, Sense-Offender wrote:

At 8/1/16 05:21 PM, Sense-Offender wrote: This is the most retarded fucking thread.

Are you nominating this thread for most retarded fucking thread?

Yes, you can put my meds in my applesauce.
DoctorStrongbad has been committed.

Ah, the quote editing again. High tech and clever! This is your third post since my post you're finally replying to, and 24 hours after as well. You're time-releasing responses to pad your post count and bump your threads again. tsk tsk. And there was only one other post besides yours since then, too!

Your mom is the meanest user here

At 7/31/16 01:06 PM, DeftonesFan665 wrote:

Lmao Nobody even nominated me, yet you put me on the list.

I just went back, looked through the entire thread and you're right. I noticed how he tends to ignore people who call him out, and only replies when other people notice too.
I'll just unconfirm because this is bullshit.

At 8/1/16 09:54 PM, VenomationsTV wrote: Even more generic response

How could a response even be more generic?

At 8/2/16 05:35 PM, Sense-Offender wrote: Ah, the quote editing again. High tech and clever!

Thanks, I am very clever.

This is your third post since my post you're finally replying to, and 24 hours after as well. You're time-releasing responses to pad your post count and bump your threads again. tsk tsk. And there was only one other post besides yours since then, too!

Why would you care how I post in this topic? Are you the post police? Are you going to back trace me? Oh no, you done goofed. lol

At 8/2/16 05:56 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:

This is your third post since my post you're finally replying to, and 24 hours after as well. You're time-releasing responses to pad your post count and bump your threads again. tsk tsk. And there was only one other post besides yours since then, too!

Why would you care how I post in this topic? Are you the post police? Are you going to back trace me? Oh no, you done goofed. lol

Are you serious? Your motives are pretty obvious if you'd ask me, and that's because spacing out replies like that gives you a higher post count. I'm pretty sure you're just going to brush me off for a 'hater' or something like that, but I can assure you that I'm only being honest.
Also, when are you going to unconfirm Defttones? She wasn't nominated in the first place, yet you ignored both of our posts. Not only that, but this has already happened multiple times just in this thread. Why make a thread like this if you're just going to ignore people's posts?

At 8/2/16 05:56 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:

At 8/1/16 09:54 PM, VenomationsTV wrote: Even more generic response

How could a response even be more generic?

response that's even more generic

At 8/2/16 05:37 PM, SpectreNeon wrote: Your mom is the meanest user here

My mom does not use NewGrounds. Check and mate.

At 8/2/16 05:43 PM, supergandhi64 wrote: just a quick status update i'm still the meanest

That still remains to be seen. BTW, did you get the joke about " back tracing " and " You done goofed? " I am still laughing about that one.

I vote DSB because he makes retarded threads like these to boost his post count while not giving a shit about the quality of his posts.

Truly a selfish narcissist.

At 8/2/16 05:48 PM, Oddlem wrote:

At 7/31/16 01:06 PM, DeftonesFan665 wrote:

Lmao Nobody even nominated me, yet you put me on the list.

That user is blocked due to her multiple attacks and insults on me for no reason.

I just went back, looked through the entire thread and you're right.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

I noticed how he tends to ignore people who call him out, and only replies when other people notice too.

That is incorrect. I try to reply to every post.

I'll just unconfirm because this is bullshit.

All you had to do was tell me this, you don't have to go so upset over nothing.

At 8/3/16 01:34 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:

All you had to do was tell me this, you don't have to go so upset over nothing.

I forgot that you blocked her, and I'll admit that's my bad. At the same time, you still didn't reply to my posts after hours and replied to other people and I'm not blocked, suggesting that you did in fact see them. I'd say that's a reason to get a bit frustrated if you'd ask me.

At 8/2/16 06:11 PM, Oddlem wrote: I'm pretty sure you're just going to brush me off for a 'hater' or something like that, but I can assure you that I'm only being honest.

We already discussed this issue.

Not only that, but this has already happened multiple times just in this thread. Why make a thread like this if you're just going to ignore people's posts?

This is a catch 22. I try to reply to every post, but sometimes it takes time to get to the newest ones. New posters can get impatient. Should I only reply to new posts, and ignore older ones? I find it best to do them in order.

At 8/2/16 06:40 PM, VenomationsTV wrote: response that's even more generic

I hope that you are enjoining this conversation and topic.

At 8/3/16 01:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:

This is a catch 22. I try to reply to every post, but sometimes it takes time to get to the newest ones. New posters can get impatient. Should I only reply to new posts, and ignore older ones? I find it best to do them in order.

No, that's not what I'm trying to tell you and I'm not angry only because you didn't reply to me right away or something. What I'm trying to say is that you replied to newer posts that were after mine and didn't reply to mine meaning that you saw what I said, hence why I said "and replied to other people."

At 8/3/16 01:38 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: This is a catch 22. I try to reply to every post, but sometimes it takes time to get to the newest ones. New posters can get impatient. Should I only reply to new posts, and ignore older ones? I find it best to do them in order.

Maybe don't try to reply to every post? Not every post needs your reply (especially if you have nothing of importance to say). Half the posts on here have nothing to do with the topic anyway. Just stick to ones that do follow the topic of the thread.

Well I think 9 pages of replies is enough