At 4/21/16 02:18 PM, SithCorduroy wrote:
Masters of the Universe.
You mean there was a He-Man movie? How have I never heard of this?
At 4/21/16 08:19 PM, mysticvortex13 wrote:
machete was so bad at being an action movie that it made an excellent comedy.
Machete was an action comedy. This wasn't accidental. And yes it was a good movie. This doesn't count as "so bad it's good" because it was intentional. To be "so bad it's good" the movie has to legitimately suck but people somehow like it anyway.
At 4/21/16 10:06 PM, DomoMekko wrote:
I don't know why but I think that older movies are much better than the new ones
That's because they are much better. Of course someone could always pick an old stinker and compare with a new movie that's decent, but if you pick like an "average" movie from each period and compare them or if you pick maybe the best movies from various years, yeah the older movies are generally better. Well, at least from the 1970s and onward -- you go too far back and you get majority stinkers again.
At 4/22/16 02:06 AM, Dr-Worm wrote:
Spring Breakers
For the most part I agree. That was a good movie but then again I like party movies. I was thinking it was going to suck because all the reviews said it sucked but then I watched it and it didn't suck.
I liked both Dukes of Hazzard movies. For some reason not a lot of people liked those apparently.
Miss March was also a good movie that didn't get good ratings.
I guess it depends if you like party movies or not. I happen to like party movies and stoner movies.