At 3/28/16 05:45 PM, Sekhem wrote:
"critically and artistically" were key words in my original post that you quoted
i never said popularly it wasn't successful, but i do mean that the weight of a low iq moron's opinion, like yours who can't read a post doesn't mean shit to me
I'm not even getting into the who Van Gogh v Margaret Keane thing. They aren't even from the same century.
Proof was in the facts Sekhem. You're implication that viewers can't comprehend critical analysis is deluded. These users are scoring and writing reviews online, you've just done that. That's criticism of the film, editorially, artistically, audibly, visually. Production through and through. If you can't accept that they have critical acclaim and put people down to "morons" when they don't agree with you, then that's an issue with yourself. Not everyone else.
I've not even spoken of what I thought about the film. I've dealt in facts of what has been proved by online audiences and numbers. So you talking about my opinion is pointless, since I've never spoke about how I felt about the film, but referred to mass sources, who evidently like it.
The fact you've decided to turn to insults shows you cant even have rational discussion about this though, with intent to make this personal. Which is okay, some people can't comprehend discussion without getting personally invested, but to be honest before it goes on any further, I really can't be bothered with it. It just makes the discussion...whiney.
In the end the masses show they love it, the Box office numbers show they love it and the criticism from the aimed target audiences love it. There's many that don't, and they've made their voices heard, which can only help the DCEU. But, knowing the numbers you can see you're in the minority with a handful of critics. The rest, liked it.
It's a shame to hear you disliked the film, after possibly spending your money. But hey, that's cinema, and a gamble with every film. Maybe you'll have better luck with Civil War, or Suicide Squad.
See ya.