Why?

[WinterrowdSolutions]

Why does 'Under Judgement' exist? I just uploaded a animation and there's another one like that and did that one get deleted? NO.

[icecreammac]

"Under Judgment" exists to allow users to judge whether a submission is good enough to be put on NewGrounds. It is mainly a way to keep spam, shovelware, offensive material, stolen material, and other such junk from clogging the website.

[PussyShark]

You know what, I can't explain why but I like you for some reason.

[EyeLovePoozy]

At 8/20/15 12:14 PM, WinterrowdSolutions wrote: Why does 'Under Judgement' exist? I just uploaded a animation and there's another one like that and did that one get deleted? NO.

By all means Mr. Mad Pants, please link other submissions under judgement that are also:

1. Screamers (against the rules).
2. Stolen (you even admitted so in the description).

We'll smash those just as hard as we smashed your two stupid bullshit "submissions".

[ArcadeDominator]

Then this will be another Youtube.

[Bit]

Which submission was yours? I was probably one of the users who 0'd it, and my vote counts for 11.72 votes.

[WinterrowdSolutions]

At 8/20/15 12:30 PM, EyeLovePoozy wrote:

At 8/20/15 12:14 PM, WinterrowdSolutions wrote: Why does 'Under Judgement' exist? I just uploaded a animation and there's another one like that and did that one get deleted? NO.

By all means Mr. Mad Pants, please link other submissions under judgement that are also:

1. Screamers (against the rules).
2. Stolen (you even admitted so in the description).

We'll smash those just as hard as we smashed your two stupid bullshit "submissions".

• 

  Wheres Waldo?

  by TheGuyYouAllHate

  A challenging find waldo game.

  Game

  34,294 Views

  (Everyone)

[EyeLovePoozy]

At 8/20/15 01:30 PM, WinterrowdSolutions wrote:

At 8/20/15 12:30 PM, EyeLovePoozy wrote:

At 8/20/15 12:14 PM, WinterrowdSolutions wrote: Why does 'Under Judgement' exist? I just uploaded a animation and there's another one like that and did that one get deleted? NO.

By all means Mr. Mad Pants, please link other submissions under judgement that are also:

1. Screamers (against the rules).
2. Stolen (you even admitted so in the description).

We'll smash those just as hard as we smashed your two stupid bullshit "submissions".

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/57335

That's from 2002 numb nuts. As in when screamers were kinda of funny and not against the rules 2002. Also, that wasn't stolen like yours were not to mention the fact that it is thirteen whole years past judgement.

C'mon man, you can do better than that.