At 8/14/15 02:42 PM, TheGamechanger wrote:At 8/14/15 12:33 PM, dem0lecule wrote:What was the name of the thread? I might find it on the Wayback Machine for Sword-of-King's Deleted Thread Archive.
The thread ended up locked and later deleted because it was a debacle for the community. I found out not long ago his account is also deleted.
Also, what's the date of the thread?
At 8/14/15 02:28 PM, mysticvortex13 wrote: she really was getting those kinds of messages though. and apparently nobody was doing anything about it. so i can see why she felt that way.
She wasn't though and we DID reach out to her multiple times to make sure that was the case. In the end, she was the one harassing other people, not the other way around. Some people are just really good at playing the victim while actually being the perpetrator. You weren't the only person taken in by her antics, which is partly why she was such a nuisance.
At 8/14/15 12:01 AM, BrenTheMan wrote: don't claim that the site's mods and staff encourage illegal activities, etc.
Newgrounds is a front for the mafia. I have proof: [LINK REDACTED]
At 8/14/15 03:14 PM, Bit wrote:At 8/14/15 12:01 AM, BrenTheMan wrote: don't claim that the site's mods and staff encourage illegal activities, etc.Newgrounds is a front for the mafia. I have proof: [LINK REDACTED]
If that's the case then who's the Godfather?
At 8/12/15 06:15 AM, NuScarab wrote: I've understood when people use the First Amendment to argue that this is super bad and against freedom of speech. I imagine it's mostly Americans using this line of thought, and likewise I don't see understand why anywhere that frowns upon, say, defending paedophilia is some sort of "socialist" dystopia. The Internet has room for everyone, but there are reasons why some things are taboo and it's not just because of people being "sheeple", or "socialists", or whatever. I'm all for understanding these things.
Believing what you want is freedom of speech, this is not the same as doing what you want. Thinking children are attractive for example is totally fine, but acting on that in any way is illegal for good reason. There is no loop hole or anything for internet forums with freedom of speech as you making a post is an action as opposed to a belief. Putting down text and posting it online is no longer free speech due to the effect it can now have and is therefore now controlled by rules like all forums have.
opposed to demonising them (note how ridiculous claims in the satanic ritual abuse vein are still being connected with paedophilia here in the UK)
Those who worship Satan are probably the best of the Christians when it comes to children, it is those who worship God that rape their children and hope we call it child abuse.
There is one way to accomplish this.
Refuse to feed the mods'/Admins' egos.
Ecchi first, ask questions never.
At 8/14/15 01:53 PM, mysticvortex13 wrote: i'm fine with that. you don't need to respond to me if you don't want to. you'll learn through experience what i meant one day.
you don't appear to be concerned. you appear level-headed but confused.
i'm glad that you at least, can keep emotions and logic seperate, even if you cant follow my train of logic.
so no, you're not butthurt.
what you were was oblivious.
Oh, fuck you. I tried to be polite, but I'm not going to keep it together for a paedophilia defender trying to make me into the bad guy. I don't need this, and neither does anyone else. That's why people don't like you. It's not a matter of conspiracy and it's not a matter of people being intellectually inferior to you. Grow up.
EDIT: You're probably a troll at this point too, so I'll just point out that I'm having a fun evening/morning, thanks.
At 8/14/15 05:22 PM, Ragnarokia wrote:At 8/12/15 06:15 AM, NuScarab wrote: I've understood when people use the First Amendment to argue that this is super bad and against freedom of speech.
lmao, I meant "never understood". Oh boy.
At 8/11/15 07:36 PM, Kwing wrote: I remember @Fro got perma-banned back when he went by a different name (can't remember it right now) and made some appeal to Wade and all that jazz. I guess you could ask him.
I got perma-banned from writing an abusive review that linked to an inappropriate website. I apologized, matured, served about a year of my time and had the ban lifted one day when I asked Wade about it. I went under Corky52 at the time.
At 8/14/15 11:14 PM, dem0lecule wrote:At 8/14/15 11:10 PM, dem0lecule wrote:Oh shit I mistyped his name, hence I couldn't find him. This is the star @MillsApparatus. His evident post and Tom's reply is still there (along with my shameful comments lol).At 8/14/15 03:04 PM, TheGamechanger wrote: Also, what's the date of the thread?Mid to late 2011 something.
I'm currently on the Wayback Machine and I went by the date of which he was banned for 10 years. The Wayback Machine apparently didn't record that date (assuming that's the date in which the thread ended and/or got deleted).
Audio Forum 2011: https://web.archive.org/web/20111227043340*/http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/forum/13
