00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

Jibrail just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Is this normal?

3,752 Views | 45 Replies

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 12:48:18


At 7/31/15 12:23 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote: No, actually, the entire Universal Law is severed when you do not respect the Universal Law [by using other bases despite the Universal Law].

Incredible. You do not understand the meaning of number bases.

Not like you aren't a troll in the first place, but nice one, I enjoyed myself.


This post is generated by human intelligence (or lack thereof).

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 12:53:34


At 7/31/15 12:48 PM, Jin wrote:
At 7/31/15 12:23 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote: No, actually, the entire Universal Law is severed when you do not respect the Universal Law [by using other bases despite the Universal Law].
Incredible. You do not understand the meaning of number bases.

Not like you aren't a troll in the first place, but nice one, I enjoyed myself.

It may appear to you that I do not understand it, but that's simply not the case here. The reason why you believe that I do not understand something, is because you have yet to recognize that my knowledge surpasses today's knowledge.

The number 10 is simply a reset back to 1. There is no "10" base" - something I can prove.

10 x 1.618 = 16.18 <--- This is incorrect, thus showing that 10-base is innately flawed.

1.0 x 1.618 = 1.618 <--- This is the Universal Effect.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10, is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1

The Universal Law is 9-base. They do not teach this because today's logic has yet to catch up to the logic I am bringing to this world soon.

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 13:00:58


At 7/31/15 12:53 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote: The Universal Law is 9-base. They do not teach this because today's logic has yet to catch up to the logic I am bringing to this world soon.

mmk


This post is generated by human intelligence (or lack thereof).

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 13:19:17


Holy shit, OP, you're fucking nuts. Are you alright?


did you fall from the sky love

kik me baby

BBS Signature

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 13:24:02 (edited 2015-07-31 13:32:22)


At 7/31/15 01:08 PM, mysteriouslila wrote: OP needs help. Seriously. Proper medical help... We're reaching levels of lunacy never seen on this forum before. I've seen "fucked up" but this is something else..

This is not lunacy. You simply are not ready to accept the knowledge I bare. That is perfectly fine, but let's have manners here and try not to talk down on people over confusion. If you need help to understand, ask questions instead.

Here. I will show you what I am capable of doing, just to help you understand that this is not lunacy. This is pure beauty.

Are you familiar with Egyptian Pi? 3.142857...

Official mathematicians have already explained that Egyptian Pi is perfect compared to normal Pi 3.141592653589... And yet today's society continues to use an outdated version of Pi, much with everything else they teach. This is why you find it difficult to understand my work, you have been deprived of true knowledge by your very own society.

But that's not the point here. What I am about to do will demonstrate what I really can do with numbers.

I had built a pyramid, while following an algorithm that has yet to exist in the eyes and minds of today's people.

Until today...

1
1+1+2=4
1+1+2+4+3=11 <--- 1+1
1+1+2+4+3+11+4=26 <--- 2+6
1+1+2+4+3+11+4+26+5=57

14 28 57

Is this normal?

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 13:47:47


At 7/31/15 01:24 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote:
At 7/31/15 01:08 PM, mysteriouslila wrote: OP needs help. Seriously. Proper medical help... We're reaching levels of lunacy never seen on this forum before. I've seen "fucked up" but this is something else..
This is not lunacy. You simply are not ready to accept the knowledge I bare. That is perfectly fine, but let's have manners here and try not to talk down on people over confusion. If you need help to understand, ask questions instead.

Holy shit, you are insane. Go somewhere to seek some medical attention, because it's been pretty obvious from the beginning of this thread to now that you really need it.


did you fall from the sky love

kik me baby

BBS Signature

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 13:50:01 (edited 2015-07-31 13:52:05)


At 7/31/15 01:41 PM, mysteriouslila wrote:
At 7/31/15 01:24 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote:

absolute bullshit
I think we all agree, dude... You write nonsense and claim you're a step ahead in maths when obviously you can't even deal with formal demonstrations...

How can we agree with your emotion if you're the only one feeling it?

If you want to learn, then ask questions.

Your emotions are yours, and yours alone.

If you want reason, something we can share together, you must first choose to learn and listen.

Here's a trick:

They say everything returns back to the sun.

The sun's diameter is 864,000 Miles.

864 + 864 + 864 + 864 = 3456.

We have 3 4 5 6, but we do not have 1 7 2 or 8.

3456 + 3456 + 3456 + 3456 + Another 3456 = 17280.

We now have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8, but still no 9.

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 = 36° = 3+6 = 9°.

We now have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9.

The only reason why I can do this, is because "864" is interconnected with the center of our Universe.

Is this normal?

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 14:06:19 (edited 2015-07-31 14:10:45)


At 7/31/15 01:50 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote:

How can we agree with your emotion if you're the only one feeling it?

If you want to learn, then ask questions.

Your emotions are yours, and yours alone.

If you want reason, something we can share together, you must first choose to learn and listen.

Here's a trick:

They say everything returns back to the sun.

The sun's diameter is 864,000 Miles.

864 + 864 + 864 + 864 = 3456.

Lol, school kid. Distance to the center of the galaxy from Sirius is 7613 parsecs, distance from Sun to Sirius is 8.591 light years, sun diameter is 864400 miles. You get an F for this one. Prepare the homework better next time.

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 14:16:46 (edited 2015-07-31 14:17:10)


At 7/31/15 02:06 PM, Bckscr wrote:
At 7/31/15 01:50 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote:

How can we agree with your emotion if you're the only one feeling it?

If you want to learn, then ask questions.

Your emotions are yours, and yours alone.

If you want reason, something we can share together, you must first choose to learn and listen.

Here's a trick:

They say everything returns back to the sun.

The sun's diameter is 864,000 Miles.

864 + 864 + 864 + 864 = 3456.
Lol, school kid. Distance to the center of the galaxy from Sirius is 7613 parsecs, distance from Sun to Sirius is 8.591 light years, sun diameter is 864400 miles. You get an F for this one. Prepare the homework better next time.

Those are approximations.

What I have are the genuine values of universal geometry.

I can prove this simply by taking formulas from individuals that surpassed the scientific community, and connecting them to the universal phenomenon that can be observed throughout reality.

Let's take G = 6.67, for an example.

This is coming from Max Planck. We can use this formula with unscathed confidence.

Now observe.

6 x 6 x 7 = 252.

252 + 252 = 504°, which is also out of the infinite numbers, 1 of the 10 "untouchable" values.

504 + 504 = 1008°, which is a number that Hinduism referred to as "divine".

Keep in mind that the Moon's Radius is 108°; its Diameter is 216° [108+108].

216 + 216 = 432°, which is the A Note in Music Theory, as well as a formula [Moon's Diameter x 432 x 100 = The Distance Between The Sun And Earth.]

432 + 432 = 864°, which brings us back to a Complete Circle.

Is this normal?

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 14:21:48


At 7/31/15 02:16 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote:
At 7/31/15 02:06 PM, Bckscr wrote:
At 7/31/15 01:50 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote:
What I have are the genuine values of universal geometry.

a.k.a. I am so untalented that I can't make up interesting facts with real numbers, so i need to fake them. Anyway, you get an F for this one as well, as you steal all those info and pics from different sites. Can you at least try to do something original ? All you post is old stuff.

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 14:22:59


At 7/31/15 02:20 PM, mysteriouslila wrote:
At 7/31/15 01:51 PM, Entice wrote:
At 7/30/15 02:45 PM, Zachary wrote: Insanctuary finally lost his mind
Or maybe he just took an Algebra course
From an extremely bad teacher with quite dodgy methods then. Quite dary to go about with algebra courses claiming you've got shit figured out in physics and astrophysics with it, too. Like, man, that's not how sciences work at all.

As long as you refuse to learn with the hunger for knowledge, and instead believe that you are being taught by genuine teachers whom teach you at a level far below that of Nikola Tesla, Galileo, Pythagoras, Jung, Einstein, Fibonacci, Michelangelo... You will continue to believe that my work is flawed, when the truth is, your entire curriculum has been flawed since the beginning of academics.

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 14:41:21


At 7/31/15 02:36 PM, mysteriouslila wrote:
At 7/31/15 02:22 PM, MathematicalMessiah wrote:
Nikola Tesla, Galileo, Pythagoras, Jung, Einstein, Fibonacci, Michelangelo...
... would all have laughed at you. That is if they had noticed you. Except Nikola Tesla, who wasn't really the laughing type, maybe?

Also, you're mad.
And you don't know what my curriculum is at all.

(and you're insane. Legit lunatic)

You say a whole lot of things you could not prove behind that computer screen.

You do not know me.

Besides, you do not even know that your own society deprived you of genuine wisdom.

So you wouldn't know the authentic, even if you were insulting it right now to protect your depravity.

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 14:52:38 (edited 2015-07-31 14:55:15)


At 7/31/15 02:49 PM, Entice wrote:
At 7/31/15 02:20 PM, mysteriouslila wrote: From an extremely bad teacher with quite dodgy methods then. Quite dary to go about with algebra courses claiming you've got shit figured out in physics and astrophysics with it, too. Like, man, that's not how sciences work at all.
Hey, doesn't mean that they didn't try. Can you imagine having this guy as your student?

It's strange to me how you can respond to somebody's baseless statements wrought with emotion, as if it were intellectually stimulating.

It's almost as if the few of you cannot recognize intellect or wisdom even while you're insulting it with false intellect and wisdom.

Though, it should be apparent that it only appears this way because underneath it, you're all collectively confused about my work and consciously agreed to insult it together, instead of working together to understand it.

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 19:20:50 (edited 2015-07-31 19:21:09)


I've done the impossible: 418 / 133 = Egyptian Pi.

First, Archimedes gave us 22 / 7.

Later on, Milü gave us 355 / 113.

Today, I proudly present to you my own contribution to give to this world a more accurate formula: 418 / 133.

Do you want to know how I discovered it?

I made a video for it.

It is called "Egyptian Pi's Algorithm": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fV26E6PWXhA&feature=youtu.be">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fV26E6PWXhA&feature=youtu.be

The music that was used was composed by @ForgottenDawn - http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/636591">http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/636591

Try not to lose your integrity if you become confused by my project.

If you need help, ask questions.

Is this normal?

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 21:05:09


At 7/31/15 12:34 AM, MathematicalMessiah wrote:
To give you an idea that numbers are conscientious beauty, not a cesspool of boredom.

Oh you dont need to worry about that, I know that math can be quite beauteous, ive been made well aware of that fact. It just isnt for me is all

Response to Is this normal? 2015-07-31 21:52:31


Is there anything numerically special about the book 1984?