YES

[liljim]

Christmas came early this year.

[aListers]

I was beginning to panic there as well.

[BrokenDeck]

At 9/25/14 06:38 AM, liljim wrote: Christmas came early this year.

You broke it again didn't you? :P

Oh I see what you added...

:D :D :D

[VJF]

At 9/25/14 06:38 AM, liljim wrote: Christmas came early this year.

I wish you had made that a bit smaller so I could turn it into a sig. Tired of the one I have.

At 9/25/14 06:40 AM, aListers wrote: I was beginning to panic there as well.

Me too.

[SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2]

I've never seen things say about an hour ago. Is that new too?
...Wait, liljim, why are we all Level 1? I want my Level 6 back.

[Sword-of-Kings]

GODDAMN IT LUIS

[VJF]

At 9/25/14 06:46 AM, WahyaRanger wrote:

EDIT: We have the edit button now.

Are you kidding me? This is horrible.

[SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2]

At 9/25/14 06:50 AM, VJF wrote:

At 9/25/14 06:46 AM, WahyaRanger wrote:

EDIT: We have the edit button now.

Are you kidding me? This is horrible.

He typed out edit, it doesn't say that whenever you make an edit.

[VJF]

At 9/25/14 06:52 AM, SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2 wrote:

At 9/25/14 06:50 AM, VJF wrote:

At 9/25/14 06:46 AM, WahyaRanger wrote:

EDIT: We have the edit button now.

Are you kidding me? This is horrible.

He typed out edit, it doesn't say that whenever you make an edit.

No, I meant the whole Edit function in general.

[GoryBlizzard]

Testing it out.

Edit: it works, but it's well over a decade overdue. Most people gave up hoping for an edit button after being mercilessly shut down for suggesting it year after year.

The button's implementation obviously wasn't the only thing done here. Aside from the date/time formatting changes and everything related to that, here's a pretty noticeable bug in everyone's sig: paragraphs and rows are no longer recognized and have been consolidated into a single line. For example, my sig text has, for a while, appeared as:

'Cause you're feeding the fire within me...
Twitter | NYC Meet 2010 | NYC Meet 2011

Instead it now shows up as: 'Cause you're feeding the fire within me... Twitter | NYC Meet 2010 | NYC Meet 2011

[SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2]

At 9/25/14 06:48 AM, SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2 wrote: I've never seen things say about an hour ago. Is that new too?
...Wait, liljim, why are we all Level 1? I want my Level 6 back.

Oh, never mind the levels are back.

[ChazDude]

Testing.

EDIT: it works!

[SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2]

At 9/25/14 06:58 AM, WahyaRanger wrote:

At 9/25/14 06:52 AM, SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2 wrote:

At 9/25/14 06:50 AM, VJF wrote:

At 9/25/14 06:46 AM, WahyaRanger wrote:

EDIT: We have the edit button now.

Are you kidding me? This is horrible.

He typed out edit, it doesn't say that whenever you make an edit.

Yeah I think he meant the function in general.

@VJF they said they're going to be regulating it strictly, I don't think we should worry.

Yeah, they're keeping an edit history, so they can know who put stuff and edited it and when they did it.

[Teddiikun]

Let's hope the 'edit' button 'random word' is retard-proof.

[Teddiikun]

At 9/25/14 07:08 AM, WahyaRanger wrote:

At 9/25/14 07:07 AM, Teddiikun wrote: Let's hope the 'edit' button is retard-proof

I wouldn't say that but it does have an alarm system.

By the way, if you quote something and they edit it, will it change in the quote?

@Teddiikun you should try adding a random word in the middle of the sentence I just quoted. We're experimenting now. For science.

That's not the way it works unfortunately. Idiots can now use the edit button in a pathetic attempt to make someone look more stupid than them.

It's okay though, we're all relatively intelligent people here

[liljim]

At 9/25/14 06:46 AM, WahyaRanger wrote: EDIT2: I already have a bug report; Hitting "Post" after an edit doesn't bring you back to the thread page.

I think that's probably a caching issue, it should redirect you to your post.At

9/25/14 06:48 AM, SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2 wrote:

I've never seen things say about an hour ago. Is that new too?

Yes.

...Wait, liljim, why are we all Level 1? I want my Level 6 back.

Sorry, that's fixed.

I'm not quite sure why the history box is all out of whack here, it should take centre of the page as you're in it. I'll figure that out later.

[Bit]

Is this the real life?

Edit: It's not just fantasy.

[liljim]

And to whoever asked it, no - if you tag someone AFTER you have already posted (i.e. in an edit), that person will not be notified.

[Sword-of-Kings]

At 9/25/14 07:14 AM, liljim wrote: And to whoever asked it, no - if you tag someone AFTER you have already posted (i.e. in an edit), that person will not be notified.

Is that going to be changed in the future?

[liljim]

At 9/25/14 07:17 AM, Sword-of-Kings wrote:

At 9/25/14 07:14 AM, liljim wrote: And to whoever asked it, no - if you tag someone AFTER you have already posted (i.e. in an edit), that person will not be notified.

Is that going to be changed in the future?

I wouldn't think so.

By the way, you guys have a 15 minute window on edits.

[VJF]

At 9/25/14 07:18 AM, liljim wrote: By the way, you guys have a 15 minute window on edits.

Probably an unpopular opinion, but I like this.

It will probably stop people from spamming their own posts too much.

[Galneda]

I don't believe it. WAIT...Yes I do.

Huh...this'll save a lot of time when I make a typo. Clearing cache after editing a post does it, eh?

No it doesn't. I'm still stuck looking at the post screen. THAT needs to be fixed.

[liljim]

At 9/25/14 07:19 AM, WahyaRanger wrote: Also @liljim any idea as to how I could fix that return page issue on a personal level?

Clear your cache. I just double checked, it works fine.

[TurkeyOnAStick]

This has been implemented a lot better than I thought it would be, since previous edits are visible for all. I really don't see how people could complain about the inclusion of an Edit button, now.

[Galneda]

At 9/25/14 07:22 AM, liljim wrote:
Clear your cache. I just double checked, it works fine.

Everything works wonderful! Great work liljim!

[SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2]

At 9/25/14 07:25 AM, Phobotech wrote:

At 9/25/14 07:22 AM, liljim wrote:
Clear your cache. I just double checked, it works fine.

Damn, I was just trying to quote Phobotech, but it wouldn't let me because he kept editing it. That's gonna be annoying. Also, my edits don't take me back to the page either, but I'm gonna check again in a minute.
Still not sure...
EDIT: Huh, its probably just for the first few times or so that you edit, because its working now.

[Galneda]

At 9/25/14 07:30 AM, SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2 wrote:
Damn, I was just trying to quote Phobotech, but it wouldn't let me because he kept editing it. That's gonna be annoying.

That's interesting that you can't reply to a post thats in mid-edit...any way that can be fixed?

[TurkeyOnAStick]

At 9/25/14 07:30 AM, SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2 wrote: Damn, I was just trying to quote Phobotech, but it wouldn't let me because he kept editing it. That's gonna be annoying.

That's good, isn't it? You'd rather reply to the updated post.

[Galneda]

Ohhh, you can only edit posts that were made after the update.

I like that. It doesn't tamper with the past.

[SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2]

At 9/25/14 07:32 AM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:

At 9/25/14 07:30 AM, SNAPCRACKLEANDPOP2 wrote: Damn, I was just trying to quote Phobotech, but it wouldn't let me because he kept editing it. That's gonna be annoying.

That's good, isn't it? You'd rather reply to the updated post.

Well, it depends on the post. Before Phobotech had said how the edits didn't take him back to the page, and I was trying to respond to that, so I wouldn't have to restate it. But now, his post stated how it was now working, and that wasn't what I wanted to quote. It really just depends on what the updated post is, really.