Be a Supporter!

Canada's new Anti-Spam law

  • 202 Views
  • 23 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic
BelgarionRiva
BelgarionRiva
  • Member since: Mar. 11, 2013
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-30 21:19:27 Reply

It seems to me newgrounds didn't read the fine print on this one. Businesses aren't allowed to email people with newsletters anymore unless they have their explicit consent every 6 months. Explicit consent is defined as a paper and pen signature. Since a newsletter can't be sent without the signature in the first place, it has to be physically mailed to newgrounds before they are allowed to send to a canadian a 'weekly top 10' email.

http://business.financialpost.com/2014/07/24/canadas-anti-spam-slashes-companys-email-lists/

Most companies lost 90% of their email advertisment base. Seems that I still get newgrounds newsletter.

DM692
DM692
  • Member since: May. 5, 2007
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 15
Audiophile
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-30 21:22:07 Reply

That's not how federal advertising law works


BBS Signature
NekoMika
NekoMika
  • Member since: Jul. 19, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Moderator
Level 45
Musician
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-30 21:22:52 Reply

You do know the emails are optional, right?


Request Reviews // #9 Reviewer // #3 Audio Reviewer

BBS Signature
BelgarionRiva
BelgarionRiva
  • Member since: Mar. 11, 2013
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-30 21:24:45 Reply

At 7/30/14 09:22 PM, SCTE3 wrote: You do know the emails are optional, right?

I don't see it requesting a physical signature anywhere. It seems a little draconian to me. I guess I'm writing this here because newgrounds is the only thing I get newsletters from (and want them).

Scintillating
Scintillating
  • Member since: Sep. 11, 2011
  • Online!
Forum Stats
Member
Level 04
Blank Slate
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-30 22:14:12 Reply

At 7/30/14 09:24 PM, BelgarionRiva wrote:
At 7/30/14 09:22 PM, SCTE3 wrote: You do know the emails are optional, right?
I don't see it requesting a physical signature anywhere. It seems a little draconian to me. I guess I'm writing this here because newgrounds is the only thing I get newsletters from (and want them).

Lol ain't nobody give a shit about your stupid canuck laws. What are they going to do, extradite Tom Fulp to maple-land? HAH

Chronamut
Chronamut
  • Member since: Oct. 9, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 43
Artist
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-30 22:50:24 Reply

At 7/30/14 10:14 PM, Scintillating wrote: Lol ain't nobody give a shit about your stupid canuck laws. What are they going to do, extradite Tom Fulp to maple-land? HAH

psychogoldfish was originally canadian you know..

yurgenburgen
yurgenburgen
  • Member since: May. 28, 2001
  • Online!
Forum Stats
Member
Level 48
Artist
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-30 23:45:38 Reply

if the email is coming from a server outside of canada I doubt there's much anyone can do about it

Chronamut
Chronamut
  • Member since: Oct. 9, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 43
Artist
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-30 23:47:13 Reply

there will be no more ham in a can in canada.

BelgarionRiva
BelgarionRiva
  • Member since: Mar. 11, 2013
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 08:10:36 Reply

At 7/30/14 10:14 PM, Scintillating wrote:
At 7/30/14 09:24 PM, BelgarionRiva wrote:
At 7/30/14 09:22 PM, SCTE3 wrote: You do know the emails are optional, right?
I don't see it requesting a physical signature anywhere. It seems a little draconian to me. I guess I'm writing this here because newgrounds is the only thing I get newsletters from (and want them).
Lol ain't nobody give a shit about your stupid canuck laws. What are they going to do, extradite Tom Fulp to maple-land? HAH

Well I heard the fine for individuals is 1million dollar and the fine for companies is 10 million dollars. Don't know if it goes across borders.

EyeLovePoozy
EyeLovePoozy
  • Member since: Apr. 17, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Moderator
Level 26
Blank Slate
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 08:48:29 Reply

Listen up Canadians, you lovable rubes.

You should not be allowing your government to make legislation to control things like spam. Besides being absolutely useless, allowing your politicians to make these types of laws opens the door for them to legislate all types of other shit.

What's next?

A small fine if you talk shit about a politician on the internet?
Three months in jail if you mock the queen on social media?
Public flagellation if you blog about how the government should or shouldn't be doing something?

Seriously guys, don't drop the ball. In all honesty they're probably just testing the waters for this type of stuff with something as innocent sounding as laws to stop spam. That's how it starts, everything worsens incrementally afterwards...

Amaranthus
Amaranthus
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2011
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 27
Melancholy
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 10:08:40 Reply

I don't like spam.


BBS Signature
Sirbrickrock
Sirbrickrock
  • Member since: Jan. 8, 2014
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 04
Artist
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:09:23 Reply

At 7/31/14 10:08 AM, Amaranthus wrote: I don't like spam.

I know it's the worst!!

Canada's new Anti-Spam law


Hello I'm draw art and art acessories

BBS Signature
Makakaov
Makakaov
  • Member since: Jun. 23, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 23
Blank Slate
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:14:02 Reply

So America, when are you going to invade Canadian internet to give it freedom?

Chronamut
Chronamut
  • Member since: Oct. 9, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 43
Artist
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:15:58 Reply

At 7/31/14 08:48 AM, EyeLovePoozy wrote: Listen up Canadians, you lovable rubes.

You should not be allowing your government to make legislation to control things like spam. Besides being absolutely useless, allowing your politicians to make these types of laws opens the door for them to legislate all types of other shit.

What's next?

A small fine if you talk shit about a politician on the internet?
Three months in jail if you mock the queen on social media?
Public flagellation if you blog about how the government should or shouldn't be doing something?
Categorizing americans as "neo-mexicans"

*writes all these down*

I will fwd these to stephen harper right away.

Now to label america as a "third world country"..

NGPulp
NGPulp
  • Member since: Jan. 28, 2011
  • Online!
Forum Stats
Member
Level 10
Writer
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:16:04 Reply

At 7/31/14 10:08 AM, Amaranthus wrote: I don't like spam.

I love it.

Chronamut
Chronamut
  • Member since: Oct. 9, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 43
Artist
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:17:27 Reply

At 7/31/14 11:16 AM, NGPulp wrote:
At 7/31/14 10:08 AM, Amaranthus wrote: I don't like spam.
I love it.

I do not like green eggs and spam..

NGPulp
NGPulp
  • Member since: Jan. 28, 2011
  • Online!
Forum Stats
Member
Level 10
Writer
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:20:26 Reply

At 7/31/14 11:17 AM, Chronamut wrote:
At 7/31/14 11:16 AM, NGPulp wrote:
At 7/31/14 10:08 AM, Amaranthus wrote: I don't like spam.
I do not like green eggs and spam..

It's green eggs and HAM-- fucking HAM!

Fuckin' dolt.

Chronamut
Chronamut
  • Member since: Oct. 9, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 43
Artist
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:38:34 Reply

At 7/31/14 11:20 AM, NGPulp wrote:
At 7/31/14 11:17 AM, Chronamut wrote:
At 7/31/14 11:16 AM, NGPulp wrote:
At 7/31/14 10:08 AM, Amaranthus wrote: I don't like spam.
I do not like green eggs and spam..
It's green eggs and HAM-- fucking HAM!

Fuckin' dolt.

green legs and flan

KatMaestro
KatMaestro
  • Member since: Dec. 9, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 10
Blank Slate
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:50:22 Reply

I don't care about email spam. You can filter mails so that most spams can't get through. I care about the stupid spam call that even I put my phone on Do Not Call list, they still keep it coming. Canada need this.

Chronamut
Chronamut
  • Member since: Oct. 9, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 43
Artist
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:51:53 Reply

At 7/31/14 11:50 AM, KatMaestro wrote: I don't care about email spam. You can filter mails so that most spams can't get through. I care about the stupid spam call that even I put my phone on Do Not Call list, they still keep it coming. Canada need this.

do what I did - get rid of your phone.

You'll be amazed with the internet just how much you don't actually NEED a phone.

tox
tox
  • Member since: Mar. 13, 2007
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 28
Audiophile
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:52:18 Reply

Newgrounds is american.. They are unaffected by this law


call me toxie 0.~
reached vet status by RacistBassist , fuckyeah.jpg

BBS Signature
KatMaestro
KatMaestro
  • Member since: Dec. 9, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 10
Blank Slate
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 11:59:30 Reply

At 7/31/14 11:51 AM, Chronamut wrote:
At 7/31/14 11:50 AM, KatMaestro wrote: I don't care about email spam. You can filter mails so that most spams can't get through. I care about the stupid spam call that even I put my phone on Do Not Call list, they still keep it coming. Canada need this.
do what I did - get rid of your phone.

You'll be amazed with the internet just how much you don't actually NEED a phone.

As someone who sits on fire every time a service/system down or have issue, a cellphone is what saved me from being fired.

SansNumbers
SansNumbers
  • Member since: Jul. 10, 2010
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 06
Musician
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-07-31 12:09:42 Reply

At 7/30/14 09:24 PM, BelgarionRiva wrote: I don't see it requesting a physical signature anywhere. It seems a little draconian to me.

You serious? Needing a physical signature to send you a newsletter online seems pretty draconian to me, especially since you can freely opt out of it most of the time anyway.


Fly me to the moon
Let me play among the stars

NGPulp
NGPulp
  • Member since: Jan. 28, 2011
  • Online!
Forum Stats
Member
Level 10
Writer
Response to Canada's new Anti-Spam law 2014-08-01 08:39:49 Reply

At 7/31/14 11:38 AM, Chronamut wrote:
At 7/31/14 11:20 AM, NGPulp wrote:
At 7/31/14 11:17 AM, Chronamut wrote:
At 7/31/14 11:16 AM, NGPulp wrote:
At 7/31/14 10:08 AM, Amaranthus wrote: I don't like spam.
I do not like green eggs and spam..
It's green eggs and HAM-- fucking HAM!
green legs and flan

GOD FUCKING DAMMIT!