I can not believe they rated super smash bros Brawl rated T. The game has Mario in it. I know that snake is in it but still. I got super smash at the age of 6.
I can not believe they rated super smash bros Brawl rated T. The game has Mario in it. I know that snake is in it but still. I got super smash at the age of 6.
"What I would and wouldn't do with your tight twink body is none of their business. But seriously, I would fucking destroy you." - Xenomit
Sorry i was suppose to put this on the video game section.
The rating system is pretty trivial anyways. Nobody follows the age restrictions anyway. Just put some descriptors on the back of the box and call it a day.
At 7/3/14 12:19 AM, RedRobinR wrote: How old are you?
Old enough to know how to reply to other posts properly.
At 7/3/14 12:53 AM, SansNumbers wrote: I literally can't believe there are 12 year olds playing the M rated game Call of Duty: Ghost Shit Warfare 7
I literally can't believe people are still complaining about Call of Duty when EA is removing features that were standard in previous titles and they're selling them as expansion packs. And all these PR stunts they've been doing to save face only makes them look worse.
I can only imagine it'll be ten years from now and the only thing keeping Call of Duty relevant is the fact that people will never stop complaining about it.
At 7/3/14 01:21 AM, Chdonga wrote: I literally can't believe people are still complaining about Call of Duty when EA is removing features that were standard in previous titles and they're selling them as expansion packs. And all these PR stunts they've been doing to save face only makes them look worse.
I can only imagine it'll be ten years from now and the only thing keeping Call of Duty relevant is the fact that people will never stop complaining about it.
It's the new fad with these corporate slimes these days. Sell half the game at full price and sell all of the other features as "DLC". When you add it all up, you're paying more than twice the price for a game. This is why I play indie games. Small scale developers. Buy the game, get all of the content. No one is out for your wallet.
"What I would and wouldn't do with your tight twink body is none of their business. But seriously, I would fucking destroy you." - Xenomit
At 7/3/14 01:25 AM, koopahermit wrote:At 7/3/14 01:21 AM, Chdonga wrote: I literally can't believe people are still complaining about Call of Duty when EA is removing features that were standard in previous titles and they're selling them as expansion packs. And all these PR stunts they've been doing to save face only makes them look worse.It's the new fad with these corporate slimes these days. Sell half the game at full price and sell all of the other features as "DLC". When you add it all up, you're paying more than twice the price for a game. This is why I play indie games. Small scale developers. Buy the game, get all of the content. No one is out for your wallet.
I can only imagine it'll be ten years from now and the only thing keeping Call of Duty relevant is the fact that people will never stop complaining about it.
Really it all started back with Nintendo64 and GameBoy I think. Nintendo64's Banjo Kazooie which couldn't be "truly" completed without also purchasing the sequel, and then various GameBoy and GameBoy Advance games that required the purchase of multiple games in order to fully complete any one of them.
DLC is just a more modern extension of that same greedy idea. Namely that buying the game doesn't give you the full game.
Not like its gonna stop you from obtaining the game anyways.
If you're on ng you're old enough to play it so whats the problem?
also ssbb was fucking gay
At 7/3/14 12:26 AM, Chdonga wrote:At 7/3/14 12:19 AM, RedRobinR wrote: How old are you?Old enough to know how to reply to other posts properly.
http://www.newgrounds.com/dump/item/d3e9b3f08a32f5794554209e009cbf7a