At 6/18/14 10:21 PM, Warforger wrote:At 6/18/14 07:38 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Do you really want to start this with me? The dots are right before your eyes. There's no ethics in this - because anyone that says otherwise is not human enough to argue human relations. This is hypocrisy, consequential and only behaves negatively and positively to those that are taking, not giving. Life is supposed to be perpetual, mutual and relative - this is everything but!Christ do you not hear how stupid you sound? Anyone who does not agree with you is either stupid or evil? You keep using words and idiomatic expressions without understanding their meaning, you keep saying random things in some jumbled statement against Corporatism, in the end it's just some guy on the internet rambling without maintaining a coherent thought, getting angry when people don't agree with him and relying on personal attacks and logical fallacies to repudiate.
You know in some ways you're even more delusional than past posters of this type, at least they tried to provide SOME evidence or at least would state the importance of evidence.
In the end I'm reminded of the Apologetic explanation for Atheists, that they actually believe in God it's just that they're mad at him for something because EVERYONE really believes in God it's just they repress their belief because they're evil, sad, stupid or mentally ill. It's ridiculous circular logic.
Still making it about me, and not the argument.
Did I make you crap your big boy pants that you have to go off on me, after I gave you a great number of points for you to address?
Nothing you said has any relevance to the points. Go back to them and address each one with more of your non-relevant responses, just because you never had anything to say, and just pretend you are making a difference, Mr. keyboard warrior.