The regression of the female mind.

[Insanctuary]

Let's be honest with ourselves; male or female. Every female's mind at first is like walking into a factory of emotions, slipping.

If I could visually imagine a female's mind, it is constantly turning into a werewolf and back to human form - ad infinitum.

Who actually thinks biting and clawing is a way of fighting? Women.

Who has such a low attention span, that they are generally associated to the cat? Women.

Who likes shiny objects? Women.

Who is reactive and emotional? Women.

Who is imaginative and sensitive? Women.

Who is always insecure? Women.

Who is always inconsistent and cryptic? Women.

Who is always losing their cool when they are pressured a tiny bit? Women.

Who is always jealous, looking for attention and devouring the world as their own? Women.

---

To the males: I have proven that females are being held back, as everything above demonstrates inflammation in their minds - that the female's mind is still in the beginning stage... they are still children! If you don't believe me, then tell me why their imagination is as strong as a child's!

To the females: You can hate me, or love me for this research. It doesn't matter, but heed my word - everything above is evidence that you are being held back by this society; your mind hasn't grown to its full length. One or more of these issues are found in every single female - while only a % of males contain these symptoms that begin in childhood.

You are putting on make up, perfecting your image, living in your heart, jealous, scared of losing those you love, fighting with your nails and biting through your lack of control over emotion, not being well known for making logical choices due to being weighed by your emotions; emotions that are the cause of you never full growing to your potential and living your entire life trying to fill a void resulted by your potential having a hole that only grows greater the more you believe this is how a female's life should be... because - females. have. never. reached. their. potential.

To the ignoramuses that try to tell me that there are females are strong women in power - they are not females, they are sociopaths; power is not a human trait - it's a trait when a human mind regresses back into a primitive state...

[Manly-Chicken]

Insanctuary's thought process:
Women don't like me?
They must be stupid.

Yeah, that's it. I gotta go post on the BBS about this...

[RacistBassist]

At 5/8/14 10:25 PM, Vnzi wrote: Oh good lord you've donned a fedora now.

I bet all those bitches didn't even want to go out with him even though he listened to their problems, talked with them, laughed with them, and did stuff together. Those fucking cunts should have known better than to assume that their friend would do friend things with them and not be operating under the guise of friendship to try to throw it in.

[Insanctuary]

At 5/8/14 10:28 PM, Manly-Chicken wrote: Insanctuary's thought process:
Women don't like me?
They must be stupid.

Yeah, that's it. I gotta go post on the BBS about this...

I'm not being a sexist or a feminist.

I am legitimately proving that the female's mind is still in a child state.

Form an argument - don't type on the keyboard, and magically assume that's an "argument" because you always agree with yourself.

[RacistBassist]

At 5/8/14 10:33 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 5/8/14 10:28 PM, Manly-Chicken wrote: Insanctuary's thought process:
Women don't like me?
They must be stupid.

Yeah, that's it. I gotta go post on the BBS about this...

I'm not being a sexist or a feminist.

I am legitimately proving that the female's mind is still in a child state.

Form an argument - don't type on the keyboard, and magically assume that's an "argument" because you always agree with yourself.

Oh hey I remember you. Weren't you supposed to quit NG last year or the year before or something, something about you becoming enlightened or some other psuedo philosophical nonsense?

[Manly-Chicken]

At 5/8/14 10:33 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 5/8/14 10:28 PM, Manly-Chicken wrote: Insanctuary's thought process:
Women don't like me?
They must be stupid.

Yeah, that's it. I gotta go post on the BBS about this...

I'm not being a sexist or a feminist.

You're saying women's minds are inferior to men's. That literally coincides with the definition of sexism (thinking one sex is better than the other). Also, feminism? How the fuck would I even think that comes close to feminism.

I am legitimately proving that the female's mind is still in a child state.

You didn't prove shit, you made a bunch of stereotype based assumptions with no proof to back it up and declared that you were right.

Form an argument - don't type on the keyboard, and magically assume that's an "argument" because you always agree with yourself.

Ok, done.

[LoboF]

Who actually thinks biting and clawing is a way of fighting?

cats?

Who likes shiny objects?

people who suffer from the Shiny Object Syndrome and cats!

I will not take this thread seriously because most of these stereotypes doesn't even make sense

[yurgenburgen]

At 5/8/14 10:23 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Who likes shiny objects?

meeeeeeeeeeeeeee

[Insanctuary]

At 5/8/14 10:34 PM, RacistBassist wrote: Oh hey I remember you. Weren't you supposed to quit NG last year or the year before or something, something about you becoming enlightened or some other psuedo philosophical nonsense?

I'm becoming enlightened every day, so I am not ready to bring it to the real world. Time is of essence.

At 5/8/14 10:34 PM, Vnzi wrote: Practice before you preach.

The argument can be found in the OP. I will break it down:

1) The female imagination is different from a male's imagination. The female's imagination shares connotations with a child's imagination because of the child state. If you argue with a female and a male, you'll easily tell who is living in reality, and who is living in their own reality.

2) The female resorts to traits found in a child. There's not a single female that doesn't resort to that child state.

3) Females fight like children, because they don't have control over their emotions. It's all over the place, just like a child's mind.

4) A female is really behind in psychical traits compared to a male - it's because of this society and it's bias towards male and female. If you don't agree with this, then I don't expect you to be sensible to begin with.

[TheCeII]

At 5/8/14 10:23 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

Who is imaginative

This is wrong

Who is always inconsistent and cryptic?

This is also wrong

[Insanctuary]

At 5/8/14 10:37 PM, Manly-Chicken wrote: You're saying women's minds are inferior to men's. That literally coincides with the definition of sexism (thinking one sex is better than the other). Also, feminism? How the fuck would I even think that comes close to feminism.

I am legitimately proving that the female's mind is still in a child state.

You didn't prove shit, you made a bunch of stereotype based assumptions with no proof to back it up and declared that you were right.

Form an argument - don't type on the keyboard, and magically assume that's an "argument" because you always agree with yourself.

Ok, done.

Inferior? No, the female's mind is younger than a male's - all the time. That's not being inferior - they have the potential, but this society is recreating the female life - the female life right now is artificial, and I can prove that from hell and back!

I am proving it, but you refuse to read in context. You just assume I'm an idiot from past impressions! Will you stop making this about me and just ask questions according to the OP? The next time you make this about me, I will not respond to you, got it?

[Insanctuary]

At 5/8/14 10:50 PM, Vnzi wrote:

At 5/8/14 10:42 PM, Insanctuary wrote: 1) The female imagination is different from a male's imagination. The female's imagination shares connotations with a child's imagination because of the child state. If you argue with a female and a male, you'll easily tell who is living in reality, and who is living in their own reality.

What evidence do you have to support that? What scientific findings do you have to actually prove that the minds of men and women are different? Do you have any evidence other than you own biased opinion?

2) The female resorts to traits found in a child. There's not a single female that doesn't resort to that child state.

There are females more mature than most males, who act like children. Really most of what you are saying is really stupid and lacks concrete evidence.

3) Females fight like children, because they don't have control over their emotions. It's all over the place, just like a child's mind.

You keep forgetting that both sexes are very much like this. Do you just turn a blind eye when you see two guys fighting?

4) A female is really behind in psychical traits compared to a male - it's because of this society and it's bias towards male and female. If you don't agree with this, then I don't expect you to be sensible to begin with.

So what you are saying is "if you dont agree with me, you are an idiot". Wow.

1) Science is about analysis, observation and demonstrating it into recreation. I'm analyzing the female mind, the male mind, the child mind and observing the correlations I've found and can demonstrate to prove that this discovery can be recreated in other situations of the same context. I am giving you the arguments, but you continue to resort to deflecting and assumptions rather than arguments and demonstrations thereof!

My argument is that the female mind is being influenced and strong-armed by the over-ruling male society, therefore it's artificial and strong male-made - the female has little to no room to be themselves, which is why all of them are living their lives being something they are not!

I'm not saying you're an idiot because you disagree - I'm saying you're an idiot because you haven't provided an argument, just accusations and ad hominems.

[Manly-Chicken]

At 5/8/14 10:48 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Inferior? No, the female's mind is younger than a male's - all the time. That's not being inferior - they have the potential, but this society is recreating the female life - the female life right now is artificial, and I can prove that from hell and back!

Then do like a study, cite various instances where this is proven, or it's not true. I can say that the ghosts of my dead great grandpa comes to me in the middle of the night and only I can see him because I have a gift, but if I can't prove it, it's probably bullshit.

I am proving it,: but you refuse to read in context. You just assume I'm an idiot from past impressions! Will you stop making this about me and just ask questions according to the OP? The next time you make this about me, I will not respond to you, got it?

What are you talking about?
I did counter your points and I didn't make it about you.
I went in between your points (thanks for spacing them out by 2 spaces, saves me the 5 seconds of making new lines btw) and countered them.
Are you just scared that I make decent counter points that you're just going to ignore me and hope I'll go away?

[joe27]

Dude, amazing.
This is quite extensive research, it was a lot to take in.

[Shade]

At 5/8/14 10:23 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Who is always inconsistent and cryptic? Insanctuary

Fixed that for you.

[Insanctuary]

At 5/8/14 10:56 PM, Manly-Chicken wrote:

At 5/8/14 10:48 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Inferior? No, the female's mind is younger than a male's - all the time. That's not being inferior - they have the potential, but this society is recreating the female life - the female life right now is artificial, and I can prove that from hell and back!

Then do like a study, cite various instances where this is proven, or it's not true. I can say that the ghosts of my dead great grandpa comes to me in the middle of the night and only I can see him because I have a gift, but if I can't prove it, it's probably bullshit.

I am proving it,: but you refuse to read in context. You just assume I'm an idiot from past impressions! Will you stop making this about me and just ask questions according to the OP? The next time you make this about me, I will not respond to you, got it?

What are you talking about?
I did counter your points and I didn't make it about you.
I went in between your points (thanks for spacing them out by 2 spaces, saves me the 5 seconds of making new lines btw) and countered them.
Are you just scared that I make decent counter points that you're just going to ignore me and hope I'll go away?

Look, there are two types of evidence: one where it's all perception; the only way to prove it or disprove it is to agree/disagree through logical arguments - like Martin Luther King Jr fought a war through words, not through evidence. He spoke through heart and what was right. So am I.

Then the other is tangible evidence that isn't entangled with our emotions and subjective problems - that's when science comes in. The above is exactly why science doesn't deal with philosophy or psychology. Evidence and Essence are two different forms of truths.

Your argument is still based on false pretenses, as I've explained above. When we are on the same page, then you can start calling me an idiot when I am being foolish.

[Tony-DarkGrave]

more pseudo-philosophy and "Scientific" bullshit compliments of Insanctuary.

[Tramps]

You've pushed the boundaries of anthropological psychology and have given the scientific community a new plateau to reach. Bravo.

[Powerage]

you've been hanging out on /r/theredpill now, haven't you?

hardly surprising, they're a bunch of deluded pseudointellectual loonies as well.

[Twone]

At 5/8/14 10:23 PM, Insanctuary wrote: To the females: You can hate me, or love me for this research.

I can just imagine this guy being surrounded by women - "we LOVE you for your extensive research into your own misogynist mind!"

[null556]

Insanctuary pls go

[HKS]

At 5/8/14 10:23 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

HOLD THE FUCKING PHONE. I got some facts for you.

To the males: I have proven that females are being held back, as everything above demonstrates inflammation in their minds - that the female's mind is still in the beginning stage... they are still children! If you don't believe me, then tell me why their imagination is as strong as a child's!

Developmentally, the average male and female brain will peak around mid-adolescent level. Our world is very, very forgiving with the creative inputs of both sexes, however, with the technology/science/creative input has ALWAYS preferred the input of males before females. Plenty of males are stuck in the loop of the late-adolescent mentality of alcohol, sex and the "american dream". It doesn't matter in the long run.

You are putting on make up, perfecting your image, living in your heart, jealous, scared of losing those you love, fighting with your nails and biting through your lack of control over emotion, not being well known for making logical choices due to being weighed by your emotions; emotions that are the cause of you never full growing to your potential and living your entire life trying to fill a void resulted by your potential having a hole that only grows greater the more you believe this is how a female's life should be... because - females. have. never. reached. their. potential.

The Danes, Vikings, and the germatic tribes did the exact same thing. Hell, modern men do the same thing. The average straight male who is fully mentally developed will put some forth some effort in a clean and neat appearance.

To the ignoramuses that try to tell me that there are females are strong women in power - they are not females, they are sociopaths; power is not a human trait - it's a trait when a human mind regresses back into a primitive state...

Let's take a look at our good friend the DSM for antisocial personality disorder (aka sociopathy)

A) There is a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15 years, as indicated by three or more of the following:
failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are

grounds for arrest;

deception, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure;

impulsivity or failure to plan ahead;

irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults;

reckless disregard for safety of self or others;

consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations;

lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another;

B) The individual is at least age 18 years.
C) There is evidence of conduct disorder with onset before age 15 years.
D) The occurrence of antisocial behavior is not exclusively during the course of schizophrenia or a manic episode.

In this amazingly long, boring list of criterial facts, these are typically more male orientated facts, especially with the criminal backgrounds. Most con-artists are men as well; however, with the conduct disorder; you're bound to see this in lower-class areas, where a lot of women aren't taught the social skills for a normal, developed lifestyle- but that's the same for men as well.

I'm outta here!

[Xenomit]

I don't know about anyone else, but my girlfriend isn't anything like what you said.

[Insanctuary]

At 5/8/14 11:14 PM, HKS wrote:

At 5/8/14 10:23 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

HOLD THE FUCKING PHONE. I got some facts for you.

To the males: I have proven that females are being held back, as everything above demonstrates inflammation in their minds - that the female's mind is still in the beginning stage... they are still children! If you don't believe me, then tell me why their imagination is as strong as a child's!

Developmentally, the average male and female brain will peak around mid-adolescent level. Our world is very, very forgiving with the creative inputs of both sexes, however, with the technology/science/creative input has ALWAYS preferred the input of males before females. Plenty of males are stuck in the loop of the late-adolescent mentality of alcohol, sex and the "american dream". It doesn't matter in the long run.

Developing brain naturally developing =/= socially influenced brain shaping by influenced opposite of its biological gender

You are putting on make up, perfecting your image, living in your heart, jealous, scared of losing those you love, fighting with your nails and biting through your lack of control over emotion, not being well known for making logical choices due to being weighed by your emotions; emotions that are the cause of you never full growing to your potential and living your entire life trying to fill a void resulted by your potential having a hole that only grows greater the more you believe this is how a female's life should be... because - females. have. never. reached. their. potential.

The Danes, Vikings, and the germatic tribes did the exact same thing. Hell, modern men do the same thing. The average straight male who is fully mentally developed will put some forth some effort in a clean and neat appearance.

They don't do it to look pretty - why are you taking everything out of context? Stop it.

I'm outta here!

Hopefully you see your logic ahead of you.

At 5/8/14 11:10 PM, Vnzi wrote:

At 5/8/14 11:04 PM, Insanctuary wrote: Look, there are two types of evidence: one where it's all perception; the only way to prove it or disprove it is to agree/disagree through logical arguments - like Martin Luther King Jr fought a war through words, not through evidence. He spoke through heart and what was right. So am I.

Well, you are basing your argument on what you believe in when scientific evidence could either help or hurt you here. This isn't a argument about what is right or wrong, this is a argument on how people have evolved. If you don't use scientific evidence to support your claims then they will be disregarded. Is that so hard to understand.

Then the other is tangible evidence that isn't entangled with our emotions and subjective problems - that's when science comes in. The above is exactly why science doesn't deal with philosophy or psychology. Evidence and Essence are two different forms of truths.

You literally said that a woman's mind is less advanced than a man's. That isn't about emotions nor philosophy, that lies under science.

Did I ever call it "scientific evidence", no? Then stop playing devil's advocate for the sake of the reasonable message behind this research. Is it so hard for you to understand that all peer-reviewed "evidence" was merely perception before it was written? That all "laws" were perception, before written down? That everything that we find "tangible" is only tangible because of our "intangible" tools? Or is that too much for you to agree with?

No, I said that a female's mind is being held back - I am not saying that it is legitimately inferior at all forms compared to a male's mind. You are again, taking things out of context and making this more complex than it has to be.

Again, are you telling me that the female's life isn't hard-pressed by the male influence?

At 5/8/14 11:07 PM, Powerage wrote: you've been hanging out on /r/theredpill now, haven't you?

hardly surprising, they're a bunch of deluded pseudointellectual loonies as well.

I wished I took the blue pill.

Actually thinking and being aware of reality for what it is, in itself is tiring and greatly depressing.

[HKS]

At 5/8/14 11:17 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

Developing brain naturally developing =/= socially influenced brain shaping by influenced opposite of its biological gender

Our brains are influenced naturally by social standards.

They don't do it to look pretty - why are you taking everything out of context? Stop it.

Certainly they do, a lot of men wear suits, not because they have the biological needs to do so; but to look attractive.

Hopefully you see your logic ahead of you.

Same for you.

[Insanctuary]

At 5/8/14 11:21 PM, HKS wrote: Our brains are influenced naturally by social standards.

This is out of context again... There's a difference between the brain's ability to be influenced - and the fact that not all influences are healthy, or logical like a male-influenced society is bringing down the female mind's potential, by shaping and artificializing the female into the male's "fantasy".

Certainly they do, a lot of men wear suits, not because they have the biological needs to do so; but to look attractive.

There's a difference between wanting to wear make up to look beautiful - and thinking you're already handsome, but wanting to look attractive with a nice suite - again, you are pulling things out of context because you're not informed in the male/female psychological traits - let alone the painfully difficult micro aspects you keep letting go over your head.

At 5/8/14 11:17 PM, Xenomit wrote: I don't know about anyone else, but my girlfriend isn't anything like what you said.

Why do I have a gut feeling that there's much more you just don't know about your girlfriend?

Love so blind - like sticking your head into an oven.

[null556]

Sounds like someone got dumped/can't get girls

[Xenomit]

At 5/8/14 11:28 PM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 5/8/14 11:17 PM, Xenomit wrote: I don't know about anyone else, but my girlfriend isn't anything like what you said.

Why do I have a gut feeling that there's much more you just don't know about your girlfriend?

Love so blind - like sticking your head into an oven.

It's not that hard to tell whether or not a girl is overly emotional or jealous all the time or lots of other things you mentioned, especially if you're in a relationship with them

Why do I have a gut feeling you've never been with a girl

[kazumazkan]

At 5/8/14 10:25 PM, Vnzi wrote: Oh good lord you've donned a fedora now.

lets rustle it

[NeonSpider]

Well this is the most misogynist thread full of blatant stereotypes I've ever seen.

Oh and, by the way, that's not research. Spewing forth gibberish from your mind does not constitute "research".