Population control

[exudaz]

Let's start controlling our population.

It's growing, it's growing too fast, and it's only hurting us.
It's time to put the foot down.

Do your part, only have one child. That's all you need, and the more you have, the less wealthy and happy they will be.

Discuss

[DragonBallDavid]

Dude I've gotta keep having kids until I have a boy. You expect me to stop with four daughters? That sounds like a fucking nightmare.

[Prinzy2]

No! I need to spread my seed to help create a superior race.

[Tony-DarkGrave]

if we took out the populations of Africa the Middle East and Indonesia then manage the resources in those regions the human race could probably survive well past space colonization.

[Xenomit]

We need to start picking off the genetically inferior.

When I say genetically inferior, I'm very specifically referring to people who have incurable genetic diseases and other ailments, genetically transmittable disfigurements, and people who have an improper amount of chromosomes. You know, things that objectively make a person inferior.

[Clamstuffer]

Overpopulation is a myth and the scape goat of failed logistics. The world population will begin dropping between 2030 and 2050. Each new person born in America puts on average more money into the economy than they take out. Every single person alive could have a house and a yard in a land mass the size of Texas.

[DeftonesFan665]

Well, first of all, teenage girls need to stop getting knocked up. That would be a good start.

[FRAYDO]

overpopulation of the earth is an issue, of course. it is one that lingers about but it is steadily becoming more and more of a concern with each birth. the resources of this earth are only so limited, and eventually it will delve into a crisis.

to enforce population control is an inhumane action, or so i would say. you cannot prevent the act of procreation worldwide, though bringing the facts around and raising awareness is something. a notice of what is happening to the earth and its resources may bring the dangers to the light, but population control is a far stretch.

[Xenomit]

Actually, fuck it, lets let humanity run out of resources before we can efficiently mine asteroids and planetoids. Humans overall aren't worthy of becoming an advanced species.

[Manly-Chicken]

Just because it's a problem in some areas doesn't mean it's a problem here.

[Manly-Chicken]

At 2/6/14 12:07 AM, Manly-Chicken wrote: Just because it's a problem in some areas doesn't mean it's a problem here.

Maybe some areas need it but America seems fine...
For now...

[RAMB0J3SUS]

Eat the children that don't make the cut in your eyes as a parent.

[DeftonesFan665]

At 2/5/14 11:57 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: if we took out the populations of Africa the Middle East and Indonesia then manage the resources in those regions the human race could probably survive well past space colonization.

As horrible as it sounds, if just half of the populations of Africa and Asia died, the world would be in much better shape in terms of natural resources. The populations of those two continents will both increase by about three billion by 2100, while the rest of the world doesn't nearly increase that much in population.

[Clamstuffer]

In order for a population to maintain itself each couple must have 2.1 children (because some kids die) right now worldwide it's about 2.3 or 2.4, but most civilized countries are well bellow that and the only reason it is that high is because they have more babies in Africa... and the only reason they have more babies in Africa is because people die all the time because there is scientifically observable phenomenon that when more people die they have more kids to maintain their population.

Every single year the amount of kids people are having drops and the United Nations tracks this and you can look it up. That is why by 2050 it can be projected we will drop under 2.1 and be a population with a shitload of unworking old people we need to take care of because people buy into this overpopulation shit because they're ignorant.

[naronic]

At 2/5/14 11:54 PM, exudaz wrote: Let's start controlling our population.

It's growing, it's growing too fast, and it's only hurting us.
It's time to put the foot down.

Do your part, only have one child. That's all you need, and the more you have, the less wealthy and happy they will be.

These things usually come hand in hand with poverty, disease and warfare.

It's also funny how all of the people that say this are unwilling to give up their spot or do anything to change what they think is the responsibility of those poorer than them.

[Piggler]

I've said it once and I'll say I again:

Fat holocaust.

[exudaz]

At 2/6/14 12:18 AM, Clamstuffer wrote: Every single year the amount of kids people are having drops and the United Nations tracks this and you can look it up. That is why by 2050 it can be projected we will drop under 2.1 and be a population with a shitload of unworking old people we need to take care of because people buy into this overpopulation shit because they're ignorant.

Wait, why would there be lots of old people to take care of because people 'buy into' overpopulation?

That makes absolutely no sense.

[exudaz]

At 2/6/14 12:29 AM, naronic wrote:

At 2/5/14 11:54 PM, exudaz wrote: Let's start controlling our population.

It's growing, it's growing too fast, and it's only hurting us.
It's time to put the foot down.

Do your part, only have one child. That's all you need, and the more you have, the less wealthy and happy they will be.

These things usually come hand in hand with poverty, disease and warfare.

It's also funny how all of the people that say this are unwilling to give up their spot or do anything to change what they think is the responsibility of those poorer than them.

I'm adopting a child when I'm thirty.
I can still pass on my family name, influence a child like I would my own, I don't have to wait 9 months, and I get to know that my kid doesn't have birth defects or anything wrong with them.

[Xenomit]

At 2/6/14 12:29 AM, naronic wrote: These things usually come hand in hand with poverty, disease and warfare.

It's also funny how all of the people that say this are unwilling to give up their spot or do anything to change what they think is the responsibility of those poorer than them.

I'm not suggesting people have less kids though. I'm just saying we need to kill the genetically inferior. I would do my part in that if I could get a license for it (killing) or something.

[kazumazkan]

you are racist for only using people of color you damn racist fuck off.

[Insanctuary]

At 2/6/14 12:41 AM, Xenomit wrote: I'm not suggesting people have less kids though. I'm just saying we need to kill the genetically inferior. I would do my part in that if I could get a license for it (killing) or something.

If it's a gene, then clearly it's a natural property; if it's a natural property, then what makes it inferior outside of our ideals? Don't fuck with nature. You can fuck yourself anytime you want, but don't fuck with nature or anything else in it.

[WiiFittoToreinaa]

At 2/5/14 11:58 PM, Xenomit wrote:

Mental retardation?

[FRAYDO]

At 2/6/14 12:32 AM, Piggler wrote: I've said it once and I'll say I again:

Fat holocaust.

america will surely be at odds with that.

[372]

the world could be a much better place

[exudaz]

At 2/6/14 12:56 AM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 2/6/14 12:41 AM, Xenomit wrote: I'm not suggesting people have less kids though. I'm just saying we need to kill the genetically inferior. I would do my part in that if I could get a license for it (killing) or something.

If it's a gene, then clearly it's a natural property; if it's a natural property, then what makes it inferior outside of our ideals? Don't fuck with nature. You can fuck yourself anytime you want, but don't fuck with nature or anything else in it.

Mental retardation is what he's probably referring to.
And while that sounds really cruel and inhumane, aborting mentally retarded children would help the rest of the world a lot. I'm not trying to be a dick, I'm just stating the facts.
And they are inferior. That's why their condition is called 'mental retardation''; they're slow, mentally, to the general populous. And they're slow because of inferior genetics; unnatural genetics. Therefore, they're genetically inferior.

Let's be honest here. If you had the option to have a normal kid or a mentally retarded kid, what would you pick?

[Prinzy2]

At 2/6/14 12:54 AM, kazumazkan wrote: you are racist for only using people of color you damn racist fuck off.

Well who are we going to kill? All the white folk? Then who would rule the western world?

[Xenomit]

At 2/6/14 01:16 AM, exudaz wrote: Mental retardation is what he's probably referring to.

That and genetically transferable diseases and disfigurements. It would be ice-cold brutal for a couple generations, but future generations would graciously thank us for improving quality of life by a massive amount by wiping out genetic conditions.

[WiiFittoToreinaa]

Bring out the next hitler.

[Swag-in-a-Bag]

Overpopulation is a myth since it is physically impossible to accomplish. An area or location can be become crowded though,but for the entire world to be overpopulated can not happen even in 1,000 years

[Halberd]

Some people should be shot

I can not express how much distaste I have for humanity and how i would rather save a dog than a disgusting human being. If there was a zombie apocalypse I would laugh and probably kill a few people too (if it were advantageous to me)

but yeah if any government people are reading this post just know that if you ever need people killed for population control contact me because I just don't give a fuck