Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Estonia, president: Toomas Hendrik Ilves
He's okay I think :)8

No president in Belgium. We do have a gay prime minister who wears a red bow tie 24/7 though. He never really messed anything up. 8/10

Merkel: 0, for doing only shit.
Gauck (the actual "president"): 5, for doing nothing.

At 1/17/14 11:29 AM, NewgroundsMike wrote: Gauck (the actual "president"): 5, for doing nothing.

Which still is better than doing the "Wulff".

At 1/18/14 07:51 AM, Haggard wrote:

At 1/17/14 11:29 AM, NewgroundsMike wrote: Gauck (the actual "president"): 5, for doing nothing.

Which still is better than doing the "Wulff".

Don't ask about Wulff, I'd need negative numbers for him.

I'd give him a 7/10 for trying to solve the nation's issues.

I find it hard to rate someone when I know he is nothing more than a figurehead that the banking cartels use to push their agendas.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-4Jd0o-Emw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7XzjOBusnE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_KAj8O8qes

-0
Maybe less than that.

At 1/18/14 10:34 PM, wildfire4461 wrote: -0
Maybe less than that.

he's worse than hitler!!!1

0bama innit w0t

Obama gets a 7 from me. He was clearly the best option out of everyone that ran against him both times. As a result, I voted for him each time he ran. I think he means well and would get a lot more done if the majority of those in the legislative branch of our government would also do their jobs. The Recovery Act/stimulus, Obamacare, overseeing Bin Laden's death, ending the war in Iraq, repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" were all just some of the big accomplishments that marked his first term. His second term has mostly sucked so far though. The extensive NSA revelations and horrid rollout of healthcare.gov have definitely hurt him badly.

His predecessor, Bush on the other hand? He gets a 3. He also meant well but did a lot of terrible things. He shouldn't have won in 2000 and picking Dick Cheney as a vice president (I'm still convinced he ran the whole show) was a terrible decision. He was far too invested in a useless war (Iraq), his signature education reform law (No Child Left Behind) was disastrous, failed to offer much if any help to the uninsured and poor, started a lot of the illegal NSA wiretapping and Internet spying that continued into Obama's presidency, and of course this could also go on and on, but I'll stop here.

I'd give Obama credit for being charismatic and stuff, for international relations it helps I believe. But.. yeah I find it kind of dumb to name a law after yourself and so forth the list goes on. I'd give him a 3, and leave it at the fact that candidate Obama would renounce President Obama if he were still running, and was still trying to sell us the same nobel peace prize yes we can bunch of bullshit.

Bush, gets a 1.5, the country has the worst intelligence "failure" under his presidency, although his VP is rumored to be well in control of things behind the curtains, in fact some even speculate that Dick answered to nobody other than Bush Senior, which wouldn't surprise me considering Bush Sr's involvement in the United Nations, CIA, and presidencies down the line over the past few decades.

Lets face it, the money that funds both sides probably all leads to the same place, all roads lead to Rome so to speak. They all probably answer to the same masters.

At 1/19/14 12:17 AM, GoryBlizzard wrote: Obama gets a 7 from me. He was clearly the best option out of everyone that ran against him both times.

That's your opinion. I think Ron Paul was the best candidate. He calls congress on it's shit all the time, including stuff about the banking cartels, which is why he was never going to win. Trust me. He would have been assassinated.

As a result, I voted for him each time he ran. I think he means well

bullshit... go on...

and would get a lot more done if the majority of those in the legislative branch of our government would also do their jobs.

That is all well and good that you think that. But it's all a TV show for the public. In the end, all that matters is the agenda of the banksters.

The Recovery Act/stimulus, Obamacare, overseeing Bin Laden's death, ending the war in Iraq, repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" were all just some of the big accomplishments that marked his first term. His second term has mostly sucked so far though. The extensive NSA revelations and horrid rollout of healthcare.gov have definitely hurt him badly.

His predecessor, Bush on the other hand? He gets a 3. He also meant well but did a lot of terrible things. He shouldn't have won in 2000 and picking Dick Cheney as a vice president (I'm still convinced he ran the whole show) was a terrible decision. He was far too invested in a useless war (Iraq),

You see it as a useless war, but that would be dismissive. The real reasons behind that war were to control that countries natural resources, and to setup the Rothschild central bank in that country.

To date, there are only 3 countries left that don't have a Rothschild central banking system setup in their country is as follows. North Korea. Cuba. Iran.

Before 9/11, the countries that did not have a Rothschild central bank were as follows. Afghanistan. Iraq. Sudan. Libya. Cuba. North Korea. Iran.

his signature education reform law (No Child Left Behind) was disastrous, failed to offer much if any help to the uninsured and poor, started a lot of the illegal NSA wiretapping and Internet spying that continued into Obama's presidency, and of course this could also go on and on, but I'll stop here.

The NSA spying is all part of the globalists agenda. Do you really think they would give us access to the internet just so we could one day use the technology to play fucking Angry Birds and online poker? They WANT to know who you are, and who you associate with. Friend's lists and pictures of all your family and loved ones... all information that people used to protect, now nonchalantly and freely given up.

At 1/19/14 12:17 AM, GoryBlizzard wrote: Obama gets a 7 from me.

His predecessor, Bush on the other hand? He gets a 3.

Wait, did you say that obama is better than bush?
For me Bush is a solid 6. A lot of complicated shit happened back then, from 9/11 to global recesion and katrina. I'm surprised he could make us survive through the worst times of America, even though I wouldn't say he made smart decisions. It was more than war for resource, call me a tinfoil but I believe it was zionists in the lobby thing that no one today would talk about and Bush himself didn't understand.

Obama? Solid 0.5/10, pure israelli shill bot version of JFK. He's continuing what Bush did but made most of them worse. Obongocare was a messed up system. Funding NSA, gay agenda, and israelli force like mad. Ben garrison was right. Vote for ron paul if you're not a libtard.
Good liberal=JFK
commie shill race card playing liberal=obongo

0 BRO OBAMA IS A PUPPET. hes being mind controlled by the illuminati!

On a scale of one to ten I'd say Obama is a 3 or 4, Bush was a 1, although I guess not as bad as Hoover, who's philosophy during the depression was "eh, it'll work itself out." being the influence for the name "hooverville", which we now call tent cities.(camps of homeless living in the woods.)

I would rate FDR as probably a 10. Dude brought us out of the depression, created social security(however flaud it may be) and put millions of americans back to work. Name a president in recent times that has done so much. Lately they're only concerned with two things: winning. And making and having more money then everyone else.