Be a Supporter!

Censorship

  • 65,663 Views
  • 1,099 Replies
Respond to this Topic
Tony-DarkGrave
Tony-DarkGrave
  • Member since: Jul. 15, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 43
Programmer
Response to Censorship Nov. 18th, 2013 @ 11:41 PM Reply

At 11/18/13 11:31 PM, Luke wrote: Newgrounds is just becoming an adult. That's the easiest way that somebody can put it. Times change and sometimes people just need to accept that whether they like it or not. Is this the end of the world? Far from it. And in a month or two this won't mean a thing to you.

NG has been in decline since 2008 and drastically slowed down. if you have a minor niche keep it, for NG it was Freedom to submit content without censorship no matter what, and Tom betrayed that by censoring Pigpen even though Tom himself made a school shooting game. hell I played the Sandy hook game and it wasn't even that good even if I didn't know it was about Sandy hook, the game should be based on merit if it should be on Newgrounds not emothional kneejerk pressure.

orangebomb
orangebomb
  • Member since: Mar. 18, 2010
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 19
Gamer
Response to Censorship Nov. 18th, 2013 @ 11:45 PM Reply

I'm a bit torn on this issue to be honest. There are a lot of parodies, satires and what have you on some pretty horrible events the last decade and a half that would be considered tasteless in most other places, or at the very least not full appreciated for what it's worth. That said however, Sandy Hook was a huge tragedy, mostly because of who died {aside from the shooter, of course} in those attacks, and it just wouldn't feel right to put something like that on here, especially now that NG has shed some of its "extreme" stuff of the past.

At the risk of sounding naive or uninformed, there are just some lines that you should not cross as it would only lead to bad things for both yourself and others even on the Internet, whether it would be sparking a flame war, disparaging comments that may go too far, or much worse consequences. In this respect, I applaud you for drawing the line and banning the game, even if it was a tough decision on your part to do so. After all, it is your website and you do what you must to make sure that your business will prosper, and so far, you have done a good job of it.


Just stop worrying, and love the bomb.

BBS Signature
Magus-Zeal
Magus-Zeal
  • Member since: Apr. 7, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 18th, 2013 @ 11:52 PM Reply

I already lost all respect for Tom when Newgrounds censored the Anita Sarkeesian game. Once the site started cowtowing to feminists I knew the Newgrounds I knew was dead.

NeonSpider
NeonSpider
  • Member since: Oct. 4, 2013
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 12
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 18th, 2013 @ 11:58 PM Reply

I'm unfamiliar with the game in question but I think what Tom Fulp did was justified. What newgrounds doesn't need is more bad press and attracting the wrong kinds of attention. That could have led to the entire website being shut down later on down the road when/if lawmakers decided to get "tough" which they love to scapegoat video games anyway. You don't want to give them an excuse to act.

Tom could have kept the game up in protest, and then we could have seen the entire website taken down sometime later on trumped up charges and then no one would have a place to showcase their games, and is that really what we want? Despite the propaganda, the US isn't really free and while you can stand up for your rights by protesting, there are consequences.

Maybe if the US was a freer nation, Tom wouldn't have felt as compelled to remove the content as he did. I don't really think it's fair to blame Tom Fulp for this. Blame the political environment in the US if you want to blame anything. I think he just did what he felt he had to do to divert negative political attention and preserve the website.

chaosphoenix88
chaosphoenix88
  • Member since: Sep. 4, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 07
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:01 AM Reply

Sometimes these things must be done. I'm all for anti-censorship, but hey maybe.....too soon?


BBS Signature
Paideia
Paideia
  • Member since: Dec. 22, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:08 AM Reply

Hey Tom, I have been here for a long time, and I have to say, I played the game on POG.com and it's really good. Artistically anyway. So I think you made the wrong decision, though I would have made the same in your place. Cheers.

Matt-Porter
Matt-Porter
  • Member since: Aug. 9, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 41
Game Developer
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:09 AM Reply

As a long-term Newgrounds user (far before my signup date), and someone who has spoken with Tom many times over the years, I feel the need to chime in.

First off, let's address the issue. The "issue", is that Newgrounds is about freedom of expression, with no limitations. If you can think it, and you can make it, you can put it up. As someone who isn't easily (if at all) offended by digital content, I get that, I really do. That being said, there are two far more important matters that aren't getting enough discussion here.

The first issue, is that this site is entirely about freedom of expression, and that it exists solely for that. While that is something Newgrounds has always stood by, is not, in any way, the foundation of this site. The foundation, has been, and continues to be, a place for artists of various types, to share their work, collaborate, and learn. While Newgrounds isn't unique to that, it's one of, if not the best around. I learned how to animate from this site. I learned how to program from this site. I now sell games, and live as a game developer, because of this site. I share the music I make on this site, and almost nowhere else. These things, these are what Newgrounds is about. Edgy content is nice, it really is, but it does not make or break Newgrounds.

The second issue I keep hearing, is that "Tom Fulp is a hypocrite". That's nonsense, and anyone who says that isn't using their head enough. The fact that Tom made a news post, and addressed multiple angles on the matter, shows this. If that's not enough for you, consider the following. Newgrounds, whether you know it or not, has been in financial decline for awhile. When a company, free-spirited or not, is in decline, trouble awaits. Newgrounds has lost most of it's ad partnerships, and suffers significantly reduced ad revenue as of late. That's why there are less game sponsorships, cash contests, etc. Tom isn't trying to stop the decline of himself getting rich, he's trying to stop the decline of becoming so poor, that he can't maintain the site, and has to shut it down. You might think that's impossible, with how big Newgrounds is, but even a million unique viewers a day wouldn't save the site without a halfway decent ad provider. Newgrounds is hurting, trying to shift to survive, and struggling, that's just the way it is. The reason that is, is because of the allowance of content that people find offensive, even if "people" cherry pick which things they personally find offensive, and cherry pick when to speak up about it.

As a closing statement, consider the following. Right now, sites make money from ad revenue, that's just the way it is. I'd bet my first unborn child, that if generating income via ads was a thing of the past, and some magical new opportunity came along, that didn't care about offensive content and just cared about people on the site, that Tom would switch to it in a heartbeat. Tom would love to preserve the original ideas of the site, and let things function as we would all love them to, but it just can't happen that way, because this is life, and sometimes things suck. Newgrounds might be a tough player, and a rebel at times, but it's still a player int he game, and there are rules - break too many, for too long, and you're out. I'd rather stay in the game, and take a few hits to my pride, then be out.

surfingthechaos
surfingthechaos
  • Member since: Mar. 3, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 20
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:12 AM Reply

At 11/18/13 11:58 PM, NeonSpider wrote: I'm unfamiliar with the game in question but I think what Tom Fulp did was justified. What newgrounds doesn't need is more bad press and attracting the wrong kinds of attention. That could have led to the entire website being shut down later on down the road when/if lawmakers decided to get "tough" which they love to scapegoat video games anyway. You don't want to give them an excuse to act.

Tom could have kept the game up in protest, and then we could have seen the entire website taken down sometime later on trumped up charges and then no one would have a place to showcase their games, and is that really what we want? Despite the propaganda, the US isn't really free and while you can stand up for your rights by protesting, there are consequences.

Maybe if the US was a freer nation, Tom wouldn't have felt as compelled to remove the content as he did. I don't really think it's fair to blame Tom Fulp for this. Blame the political environment in the US if you want to blame anything. I think he just did what he felt he had to do to divert negative political attention and preserve the website.

Again, for the fourth time. Yes, the decision made sense from a purely pragmatic business standpoint, and if Tom would have just been upfront about it from the get go then his decision would be understandable. The problem is that he is insulting everyone's intelligence by trying to feed us lines about "choosing respect for the Sandy Hook parents" and "entering a chrysalis". He should just give it to us straight without sugar coating it. The community deserves at least that much.

"don't piss on my leg and tell me it's rain" - Judge Judy

Cross666
Cross666
  • Member since: Apr. 1, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Musician
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:12 AM Reply

<div class="blogmedia">
<!-- Video embed code - don't edit this, or it will break and you'll have this ugly stuff in your blog post! -->
<div id="embed_80266">
<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/F4PjbM6Bnjw?rel=0" width="464" height="261" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</div>
</div>


BBS Signature
JakkRunt
JakkRunt
  • Member since: Oct. 20, 2013
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 07
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:13 AM Reply

Booooo! Very disappointed, Tom. If you were to censor everything just because one person was angry, you would degrade yourself to the scourge that is everyday media. *tshhh

Cross666
Cross666
  • Member since: Apr. 1, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Musician
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:20 AM Reply

Double fuck ah well here we go

Just watch this


BBS Signature
JakkRunt
JakkRunt
  • Member since: Oct. 20, 2013
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 07
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:36 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 12:20 AM, Cross666 wrote: Double fuck ah well here we go

Just watch this

I think this Newgrounds user sums it up best.. and quicker. ;x

  • Totalitarian Tom
    Totalitarian Tom by ItsTheAshtray

    Long Live the FULP!

    Score
    Under Judgment
    Type
    Movie
    Popularity
    86 Views
    Rated
    Ages 17+

Zachary
Zachary
  • Member since: Aug. 11, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Moderator
Level 30
Melancholy
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:36 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 12:20 AM, Cross666 wrote: Double fuck ah well here we go

Just watch this

Well said.


.

BBS Signature
Tony-DarkGrave
Tony-DarkGrave
  • Member since: Jul. 15, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 43
Programmer
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:39 AM Reply

PigPen is calling Tom out on Twitter. heres a pic of some PMs

Censorship

Cross666
Cross666
  • Member since: Apr. 1, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Musician
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:44 AM Reply

For what its worth I hope that kid sees my video and actually watches it up to the point where I call him out, artist to artist.


BBS Signature
JakkRunt
JakkRunt
  • Member since: Oct. 20, 2013
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 07
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:48 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 12:44 AM, Cross666 wrote: For what its worth I hope that kid sees my video and actually watches it up to the point where I call him out, artist to artist.

Don't you have to earn the title of artist...?

King-Duckford
King-Duckford
  • Member since: Mar. 3, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 47
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:51 AM Reply

I was here before there wa a Portal, back in the Assassin html days. The good old days, before the good old days. Newgrounds was provocative, obscene, violent, uncensored, and most of all RELEVANT. Remember when Newgrounds was famous? Remember when Newgrounds attracted people from all walks of life to see new independent flash works and adult themed flash? Back when viewership was huge, when it was one of the most famous sites on the entire web? It was legendary, and it catered to the general public, and had a very broad appeal to a broad base.

Flash forward several years, and this place went pro. Suddenly the lulz started to slow down. It went from fun wild west to boring over time. Instead of harassing the worst parts fo the viewership into leaving and taking their cancer with them, the admins and mods' began to coddle the disruptive sects and people, as to not inflame them and lose precious hits and ad income. this degraded Newgrounds in the long run, short term ad cash for long term degradation, in the long run it cost viewers and destroyed the community.

When kids and autistic adults began to force this place into a one purpose video game and spirte bonanza, they thought it was good money to support and feed this overenthusiastic kids, instead of keeping them in line. With thousands of sock puppets and ferverent effort, they downvoted good flash and upvoted garbage to the point the real artists felt cheated and left. Short term cash for long term degradation of Newgrounds.

They suppressed the adult content and pushed the young content. They got rid of the content that got real hits in order to appeal to what advertisers wanted, but what Newgrounds didn't, at its core and heart, really want, or what really made the site what it is. The site went from 13 year olds acting like adults, making the site actually mature, to a fanbase of 30 year olds acting like 13 year old kids. This degraded the fanbase further.

After all this, Newgrounds went into a steep decline, one that continues to this very day. Decisions are made to appeal to the wrong crowds, all for the sake of appeasing advertisers and genre fanatics. The advertisers continue to try to change Newgrounds into something it is not nor it will ever be. In the short term it makes money, keeps these advertisers happy. But in the long run, every single one of these decisions has further chased away the true fans of Newgrounds, further alienated those who made it famous, gave it the legacy the site barely survives on today. They appease the advertisers and the site dies a little, they compromise one thing to keep the cash flowing today, but what leads people away tomorrow. They sacrifice a piece of Newground's heart fora little money today, and a little bit closer to death in the future. Every decisions has destroyed the relevancy, the purpose, the drive, the appeal, the very workings that made this place worthy of its fame and reputation, that once drove it to great heights.

By finally turning on the nature of free posting, first int he forums and flash reviews many years ago, they betrayed the very core of what Newgrounds truly is. Can't offend the viewers, or thin skinned artists who need a good kick in the ass and some good advice, they say, not good for business they say. The whiney and weak took over, the people who had fun here left years ago, and all that remains are the hardcore bitter veterans, the handfuls of new recruits, and a lot of the "this palce exists to feed my ego" types that ruined this place left. The first round of cencorship, internally, was the biggest cause of the long decline of this once great site.

Today, we are watching as the inevitable happens. Eventually the advertisers were going to win their march towards killing off this site by censorship. It was only a matter of time, an slow and steady march. But it is no surprise that a site that was BUILT on offensive material, based on free posting of works despite its content, is now going to become what it not only stood against, but what built it.

Newgrounds is like 4chan, and other offensive sites that were extremely popular. They get hits, more than any clean site can get, or even hope to come close to. The problem is, you can't capitalize on it. You can't get advertisers to make money on it, you can't find a way to turn it legitimate without destroying what gave it views int he first place. You cannot take a site that is popular and thriving do to NSFW content then keep that success and viewership turning it SFW. Newgrounds was never going to be both relevant/successful/sustainable and long term profitable at the same time. Keep it oldschool NG, wild west, you'll never make a nickel on it, but it would thrive forever. Turn it into a kids sandbox, family friendly for the big advertisers and their dreams of what it will be, it will implode and die. It is like a delicate flower, it can be admired from a distance, but if you harvest it, you will crush it.

I'll tell you Tom, I've been here for the long haul, 13 years of this place. But it has been dying for a long time, and I feel I'm not part of a great website anymore, but simply watching an old friend die. Its went from entertaining and independent, to a giant daycare center for man children, a collection of shovelware, and the place for semi pro artists to showcase their work instead of an open Portal and forum for the average amateaur to make something funny. Its been dying for a very long time, and I fear this could be the death rattle of this site. Once open censorship becomes open, when the administrators openly embrace it, it has let go everything that made it great to embraced its death. What little integrity and spirit this place had left, is now officially going out. You are destroying the spirit and the past of this site, the coat tails of which it has been riding on for many years. Once the last vestiges of what Newgrounds ever meant are gone, the last of us will go with it, and there will be no Newgrounds.


BBS Signature
Cross666
Cross666
  • Member since: Apr. 1, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Musician
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:53 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 12:48 AM, JakkRunt wrote:
At 11/19/13 12:44 AM, Cross666 wrote: For what its worth I hope that kid sees my video and actually watches it up to the point where I call him out, artist to artist.
Don't you have to earn the title of artist...?

The title of "artist' is about as subjective as calling his little game a piece of "art"


BBS Signature
Swackman
Swackman
  • Member since: Jan. 5, 2010
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 12:56 AM Reply

At 11/18/13 12:58 PM, TomFulp wrote: I think a lot about that quote from Batman, "You either die a hero, or live long enough to become the villain." So in this case, NG has just survived long enough for me to finally turn my back on what some considered the most compelling thing about the site.

I think NG has the best creative people on the web and if NG didn't exist, I wouldn't find this same mix of people elsewhere. I don't know how much of this mix has been won by our support for controversial content, vs the myriad of other factors that make NG unique. I hope interesting people keep showing up and surprising us with interesting creations.

Personally, when I first stumbled upon NG back in '06, controversy played no part in becoming a fan; the silliness & fun it offered was what did it. This is something ENTIRELY different, and not fun by any means; EVEN IF there was a good purpose behind it, it sounds to me like it was done in the completely wrong way to begin with. Although, that does beg the question, why is the V-Tech game still there? I've never played either, but considering they're both by the same person, I'll assume it's in the same vein as this one is.

You were stuck in a "You're damned if ya do, and you're damned if ya don't." situation; this was the decision with the least backlash. And honestly, the fact that you even bother to give a shit about what everyone here thinks speaks volumes, knowing ya can't please everybody.

Not only that, but THE PARENTS OF THOSE KIDS were the ones who, not only respectfully, but FULLY ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THEY REALIZED THE INTENT OF THE GAME, requested its removal due to UNDERSTANDABLE EMOTIONAL TRAUMA, not a bunch of irrelevant, whiny bitches complaining about political correctness! This was an act of respect for the only people who ACTUALLY MATTER in this situation! So yeah, needless to say, I'm behind you on this one.

(Sorry for all the caps, but I felt I needed the emphasis on those particular points, on top of the underlining, as some people here don't seem to quite get it.)

One last thing, though, that I gotta ask you: If those parents hadn't said anything, would you have allowed the game to stay up?




On another note, I never realized that Pico's School was made around the time of those shootings......although, come on, Pico was saving the school from a NAZI ALIEN and her followers, who, by the way, were the ones actually shooting up the school in the first place. Because of this, I never would've associated the 2 anyway.

roadkillers
roadkillers
  • Member since: Aug. 21, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 04
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:07 AM Reply

Not saying to ban this, but I tried it and had to quit after the second scene. It said to "Kill your mother." Now I understand it is just a game, but I enjoy games to tell people about. There is no where/way I could explain or defend this to anyone else in the world. If anything this game would only cause problems in my life not solutions. A lot of people may not have children, but everyone has a mother.

This is not even mentioning that in this game you play a bad guy. Game like GTA have you play as a bad guy, but it gives you background on the characters so it does not feel as yourself. Even Fallout, where you make your own choices, there is background on the characters before you do anything. The game just felt too direct.

Now would it be smart to ban it on Newgrounds? Yes. Should it be banned? Tom, I remember playing Pico's School when I was around 10 so I looked up when it came out... It came out in 1999. That was the same year of the Columbine Massacre. For you to say it is too soon would only contradict yourself. With that said by banning this you are throwing the rules up in the air. What is acceptable and what is not? By giving them what they want there will be more pressure to clean up your site. You have kids and you felt for this... There is a game called Kill-A-Baby where you choose whether to kill a baby or not. You see insane people killing their kids on the news, how do you defend this? I understand the game, it is about shock-value and stupid laughs because we can never do this, but not everyone gets it thus because people do not understand. What do you do? If someone says their baby was killed do you keep it up?

All this does it throw a big ball of confusion into the mix. I started coming to this site by accident, I looked up Hamster Dance and was brought to a page where you shoot hamsters dancing. Soon later my cousin came on for some guy running from the mob in a point in click shooter. My friend started coming because his friend showed him a game where you pleasure a girl why she sleeps. I showed a couple of my buds that game, they started playing and showing their friends. So what you are doing is censoring what this site is... or at least was. So what is this site now?

I will always enjoy coming to this site because of what it is not what it was. To me this site is about not taking things too seriously, it's about enjoyable games/movies that make you smile because they are charmingly stupid, and it's about having a good time. When everything else is thrown into the mix it is taking things too seriously, there is no charming only stupid, and there is no good time. When everything is said and done we come here for the games that are made not the controversies. This will be a small grey area that very few will know about or even remember in Newgrounds long, successful, and even more successful future.

S3C
S3C
  • Member since: Mar. 25, 2008
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 03
Musician
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:08 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 12:44 AM, Cross666 wrote: kid

he's four years older than you


If your work isn't worth fighting for, it's not worth uploading on NG, period. (JrHager84)

BenjaminTibbetts
BenjaminTibbetts
  • Member since: Sep. 27, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 09
Musician
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:11 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 12:51 AM, King-Duckford wrote: I was here before there wa a Portal, back in the Assassin html days. <snip>

I find your post extremely moving. It does seem like the process of keeping controversial or provocative websites "alive" simultaneously "kills" those aspects which made them controversial or provocative in the very first place. If it is true that you either "die a hero" or "live long enough to see yourself become the villain", maybe it is because every hero eventually faces a decision between survival and compromise.


BBS Signature
Dragpz
Dragpz
  • Member since: Sep. 4, 2010
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:14 AM Reply

I didn't know about the Sandy Hook Massacre game until I read this topic. Hmmm... I forget the name of this particular effect.

The game itself quite possibly slipped through censorship if it did not directly allude to Sandy Hook or have "Sandy Hook" in its title, but then, it wouldn't have received the amount of attention it deserves. It tackles the issue gun control, acts as a reminder of the massacre itself, and raises the question: Why would anyone do this? Halfway through the game, I felt numb to amount of lives I was taking, because of the amount of violent media I've already been exposed to. Yet, this game brings to light how anyone, anywhere could have done something like this. So what amount of psychological pressure lead this person to commit a crime such as this? I think that's what its basically getting at.

Plus - Should everyone be trained to use firearms?
Does this have something to do with a distorted self-image (Mirrors flash randomly)
What does this say about Americans?
The US has killed many innocent children and pedestrians in the Middle East, and have had a history of doing so in the past (S. America, etc.)
not always intentionally of course, but still. So why is this a big deal?

ChrisReddie
ChrisReddie
  • Member since: Apr. 17, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 07
Artist
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:15 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 12:09 AM, Matt-Porter wrote: As a long-term Newgrounds user (far before my signup date), and someone who has spoken with Tom many times over the years, I feel the need to chime in.

I think you hit the nail right on the head. I am also of the far before my sign up date fold. I also run an internet based business. Ad revenue is how you survive. It sucks. It really sucks because as a business you are at the whim of your advertisers. You aren't in control of your own content. It slits you in the soft parts. I have posted a few times in this thread and I maintain that I don't agree with taking down the content. This is from a moral and artistic stand point. Also from the perspective of a user of the site, not an owner. I completely understand Tom's need to take it down.

Cross666
Cross666
  • Member since: Apr. 1, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Musician
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:16 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 01:08 AM, S3C wrote:
At 11/19/13 12:44 AM, Cross666 wrote: kid
he's four years older than you

Listen, watch the video all I am getting is -

1. On the whole, it's a pretty tasteless game, I think pigpen is beyond doing cheap publicity stunts like this and is more than capable of putting out tasteful, original content.

2. Don't justify lifting the ban or not having banned the game due to the possible publicity it could have generated.

That's it. I already agreed with another user in that the whole artistic integrity felt kind of shafted on the whole reasoning for removing the video in the first place. At the same time I don't feel like it should have been an issue in the first place.


BBS Signature
Tony-DarkGrave
Tony-DarkGrave
  • Member since: Jul. 15, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 43
Programmer
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:17 AM Reply

Tom is a hypocrite he made pico's school (TEN DAYS AFTER COLUMBINE), and allowing to keep Vtech Massacre and the Pillars of newgrounds was to provide a safe place for artists to submit content regardless of subject (minus racism and discrimination etc) and when Tom removed that due to pressure from special interests he compromised that integrity.

Paideia
Paideia
  • Member since: Dec. 22, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:22 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 12:51 AM, King-Duckford wrote:

Once the last vestiges of what Newgrounds ever meant are gone, the last of us will go with it, and there will be no Newgrounds.

From one bitter vet to another, I salute o7

Ron-Geno
Ron-Geno
  • Member since: Jun. 26, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 13
Gamer
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:29 AM Reply

People still bitching about Tom taking it down?

Tell you what; you same people bitching about the removal of the vid start paying Tom to keep the site up (+ a little profit), and I'm sure he won't mind complying with your bitch ass ideas.

Until then, STFU or make your own damn Newgrounds where you can say all types of offensive edgy bullshit.
Nevermind, don't stop bitching; keep complaining.

It makes for great entertainment.

Censorship


Skynet is upon us.

Exedor
Exedor
  • Member since: Jan. 15, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 54
Blank Slate
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:49 AM Reply

At 11/18/13 11:58 AM, TomFulp wrote: Over the years, a number of highly offensive games and movies have been published on Newgrounds and despite the hatemail and being dropped by just about every ad company in existence, we held firm on a policy of anti-censorship. Today, however, I pulled a reversal on that policy and maybe it was a huge mistake or maybe it was the right thing to do, I'm sure there will be a variety of opinions on the matter.

It's your site, Tom. You've got the freedom to do what you want. Keep your site the way you want it. The trash does indeed occasionally need to be taken out. It's the nature of things. People do similar things all the time, and that's ok- until that one person steps over that line, and at that point, something gets done. I approve of your decision here.


This game, however, had a certain level of artfulness and craftsmanship to it. There was a visual and technical quality that revealed a serious level of effort and passion.

It was nicely animated out, but quickly took a dark turn.

It also had a political message I personally agree with; a statement on gun control and the problem of gun violence in the US. It attempted to demonstrate how things can play out differently with changes in our gun laws.

I took it to say that if guns were outlawed, if a killer decides to kill, he will still find a way to do it, using whatever is available to do so. I agree with that thought.

It made you feel and it made you think.

It did so, however, in the context of the Sandy Hook massacre, recreating the event and putting you in the role of the shooter.

Newgrounds has faced harsh criticism in the past for standing firm on not censoring distasteful material, namely games about school shootings. All I can say is that this game took things to a new level in terms of the age of the victims and the realism of the terror they faced on that day.

For those of you who had not played it, it was not a 'fun' game. It was not comical. It was dark, and cold, and sinister. As you entered any room, the teacher would begin to escort the children out. A few of them stayed in their seats, frozen and trembling in fear as you approached them. This is where it crossed the line.

So how is it different from Pico's School or similar games? Other games have been offensive, and yet, they still had a comical feel to them, and they managed to remain disconnected from reality and heart enough to still be accepted. Pico's School was comical and still outlandish enough that it still fell well within the line of acceptability.

That was not the case with this game. It referenced a still open and tender wound before you even start the game, by referencing Sandy Hook in the title. After that, it never got fun. It never had comedy, or jokes, or humor, or anything to redeem it. It was cold, and methodic, and merciless. When it got to the point where the player chooses how to react to the children, it crossed the line of decency.

Kill the homeless bums in a game if you want. Kill the enemy soldiers if you want. Drive your car over the pedestrians and hookers on the sidewalk if you want. In a game, that's all ok. Don't harm the children, though. Children are precious and innocent, and if you're not appaled by the thought of harming a child, even if it is a game, you really need to examine yourself. Really.


Today I'm choosing respect for the Sandy Hook parents over respect for NG's censorship policies.

You did the right thing, Tom. I salute you, and stand behind you. ,:)


Either decision on this matter puts a knot in my stomach.

It shouldn't, Tom. As the head, you occasionally need to step in and make a command decision. You didn't delete something on a whim. You didn't do it to harass an author. You did it out of respect, and that is sorely lacking in today's world. You did the right thing here.

BenjaminTibbetts
BenjaminTibbetts
  • Member since: Sep. 27, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 09
Musician
Response to Censorship Nov. 19th, 2013 @ 01:57 AM Reply

At 11/19/13 01:49 AM, Exedor wrote: Kill the homeless bums in a game if you want. Kill the enemy soldiers if you want. Drive your car over the pedestrians and hookers on the sidewalk if you want. In a game, that's all ok. Don't harm the children, though. Children are precious and innocent, and if you're not appaled by the thought of harming a child, even if it is a game, you really need to examine yourself. Really.

Exedor, I would wager that no one in this thread is not appalled by the thought of harming children (or, for that matter, carelessly driving over pedestrians and hookers). But there is no good reason why games should not be able to examine appalling subjects.


BBS Signature