Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/25/13 01:15 AM, Natick wrote: getting angry always helps

Oh no, because I just love it when people question my video game accumen over an opinion, and the fact that I refuse to kiss indie developer ass because of who they are.

if you want to debate about ea again, i never did get a reply to the last post i left on that thread, not like i want one since i think already i made it clear why ea doesn't deserve praise either

I got tired of explaining why EA doesn't deserve much of the silly hate that it gets, and the fact that the games are better than what you want to give them credit for, and yet you don't acknowledge that because of politics and subjective tastes.

I'm not going to bother wasting my time arguing against a wall.

At 10/25/13 11:44 AM, orangebomb wrote: Oh no, because I just love it when people question my video game accumen over an opinion, and the fact that I refuse to kiss indie developer ass because of who they are.

i never even said it was a matter of kissing the indie developers asses but i do believe they deserve a certain level of respect that triple-a publishers don't seem to care all that much about any longer.

I got tired of explaining why EA doesn't deserve much of the silly hate that it gets, and the fact that the games are better than what you want to give them credit for, and yet you don't acknowledge that because of politics and subjective tastes.

if by explaining why ea doesn't deserve hate, you mean blatant corporate apologism (which would still be the case if you were correct about anything that you said, not that you really were), baseless assumptions about audiences for other kinds of games, calling everyone who argued against your points "hipsters" ironically enough, disregarding every incident that jin and i listed of them fucking up, restating the reasons why they get hate as if there was something off about not appreciating their dlc practices or drm bullshit, and then most of your later arguments as to why anyone should respect them amounting to nothing more than "BUT THE TECHNOLOGY IS SO EXPENSIVE" then you've done an awful job of convincing me or anyone else that they're a good company and that we're the misinformed "hipsters".

i find it hard to believe that i'm the one guy holding the unpopular opinion when most of the answers in that thread were "no"

I'm not going to bother wasting my time arguing against a wall.

lol

OOOH, I'm fucking GOOD at this game!

Ok let's see:

1. I find homosexuality to be an unnatural sexual preference and take the Nurture side on the Nature vs. Nurture debate.
2. I find transsexualism to be even more unnatural and frankly, disturbing.
3. I believe the only thing that can restrict who one can marry is the religion you are being married under and those who interpret the values of those religions, if any.
4. Both Consoles and PCs have their equally good merits in the Video Game market.
5. Feminism has evolved to mean, "better than men." And despite other feminists calling those feminists the minority extreme, they are the only ones who seem to make themselves heard and thus seem to speak for the majority of other feminists and therefore, mar feminism as a whole. (Tea party anyone?)
6. I believe all able bodied Men should treat Women better than we treat ourselves and act courteous and polite towards them (open doors, give up seats, etc).
7. We should show due respect to our elders and especially to our parents for whom we owe our upbringing and life to.
8. I think an abortion of a healthy fetus is disgusting and murderous and that all potential and healthy life should be given a chance.

I'm kind of an uncool, unpopular guy. But I stick to my guns, and I think that's something. So...

That both the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq we're justified. And all conspiracies are retarded. I just pissed off nearly every American that reads this.

At 10/25/13 03:13 PM, HollowedPumkinz wrote: OOOH, I'm fucking GOOD at this game!

No. Most of the shit you wrote is typical redneck stuff. Not unpopular, just stupid.

garbodor is the cutest pokemon

Feet and armpits are sexy

abortion should legal until birth

all forms of spirituality are fairy tale bullshit

adventure time is a horrible cartoon

spongebob is funnier than ren and stimpy

duckman is the greatest cartoon

sarah jessica parker isn't ugly

the secret of nimh is not a good cartoon

opposes capital punishment

two years is too young too bite into a triple layer burrito in a belarus bathroom at a bohemian commune.

At 10/25/13 03:13 PM, HollowedPumkinz wrote: 5. Feminism has evolved to mean, "better than men."
6. I believe all able bodied Men should treat Women better than we treat ourselves

>be hollowedpumkinz
>treat women with an exaggerated level of respect and courtesy
>act surprised when women think they're better than men

stay classy

At 10/25/13 03:22 PM, tyler2513 wrote: That both the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq we're justified. And all conspiracies are retarded. I just pissed off nearly every American that reads this.

Not really, Afghanistan was somewhat justified, it was poorly handled however when it comes to the end game (even moreso than Iraq in my opinion for this thread :)

Also, conspiracies are generally retarded.

This one (well, two actually) will be a breaker but then again, that's the point of the thread ;)

I think GWB wasn't a bad president and people who hated him would have ranked Carter above him and they should go and fuck themselves.

Ron Paul is better off being a internet star rather than a politician considering the cult following he has, especially on YouTube.

"Let's Play - Halley Wars (by Ron Paul)

I'd pay to see that.

Here's another one but this is what I honestly believe:

Adam Sandler is a talented actor who happens to star in retarded films despite running out of ideas for the past decade or so and have been pushing it since "Click". If he puts some effort into it, he would have been much better off but didn't because his bad comedy movies are what draws the audience in despite flunking on Rotten Tomatoes.

At 10/26/13 12:48 AM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Adam Sandler is a talented actor who happens to star in retarded films

Snip. He's a good actor, he's trained and has a lot of experience. That doesn't mean he should be acting alongside the ultra-elite actors in dramatist epics. His projects are children's films; he's popular with a younger audience, which is why your opinion of him from a decade-or-more ago is higher than your recent one.

At 10/26/13 12:53 AM, 24901miles wrote:

At 10/26/13 12:48 AM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Adam Sandler is a talented actor who happens to star in retarded films

Snip. He's a good actor, he's trained and has a lot of experience. That doesn't mean he should be acting alongside the ultra-elite actors in dramatist epics. His projects are children's films; he's popular with a younger audience, which is why your opinion of him from a decade-or-more ago is higher than your recent one.

Maybe but when you compare his odler films to his recent ones, the quality seems to have diminished. His movies up to aroudn mid-2000s were fun and enjoyable, but after that it gotten stupid to the point that some of the recent ones made me cringe.

With that said, he might have peaked with "Click" and had nowhere to go but down since then.

Yeah, Adam Sandler is a capable actor. Nobody's saying he's special. He's just got the ability if he tries.

Speaking of him and unpopular opinions, I think Happy Gilmore, Billy Madison and 8 Crazy Nights were kinda amusing movies.

At 10/25/13 05:04 PM, HeavenDuff wrote:

At 10/25/13 03:13 PM, HollowedPumkinz wrote: OOOH, I'm fucking GOOD at this game!

No. Most of the shit you wrote is typical redneck stuff. Not unpopular, just stupid.

haha. I think this is where a certain user would normally quote him and say "found one".

At 10/25/13 03:22 PM, tyler2513 wrote: That both the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq we're justified. And all conspiracies are retarded. I just pissed off nearly every American that reads this.

Is support for the war in Afghanistan unpopular? I never thought it was.

At 10/26/13 12:31 AM, captainlolz wrote: adventure time is a horrible cartoon

Not really an unpopular opinion around here, at least. Lots of NGers hate on it. Whatever.

Duckman is the greatest cartoon.

Well, it was a good show, anyway.

Opposes capital punishment.

Is either side of this divisive issue really popular or unpopular?

spongebob is funnier than ren and stimpy

Well, now I....

the secret of nimh is not a good cartoon

....wouldn't say that...

This country is getting overun by socialists who want their money handed to them instead of working for it (which is why that POS is in the white house). Socialism has no place in this country.

Family Guy needs to die (I seriously want to see Peter get shot in the head for the finale).

Anybody who says guys shouldn't like MLP are bigots. And if they're going to say that, they also need to say girls can't like guy things also and keep that type of bigotry going.

Political correctness is a disease that's going to eventually kill this country (unless mr. One Big Ass Mistake America beats it to it).

Copyright law is broken and only serves major corporations that are abusing it. And the Copyright Gestapo created by those companies is out to control the public with help from the government, including shit like SOPA, CISPA, and similar legislation.

No new gun control laws are needed, and liberal cocksuckers who want it need to get out of this country.

(I know those last two will piss off a couple of people here).

Aah feels good to vent.

At 10/26/13 02:39 AM, wildfire4461 wrote: This country is getting overun by socialists who want their money handed to them instead of working for it (which is why that POS is in the white house). Socialism has no place in this country.

The average worker produces more while working less because he has access to technology, resulting in a reduced wage, higher profits, and fewer jobs.

I guess you would need to be intelligent or well-read to know that. You are forgiven.

Family Guy needs to die (I seriously want to see Peter get shot in the head for the finale).

Who gives a shit?

Anybody who says guys shouldn't like MLP are bigots. And if they're going to say that, they also need to say girls can't like guy things also and keep that type of bigotry going.

Again: who gives a shit?

Political correctness is a disease that's going to eventually kill this country (unless mr. One Big Ass Mistake America beats it to it).

You have the right to free speech, go ahead and use it.

Copyright law is broken and only serves major corporations that are abusing it. And the Copyright Gestapo created by those companies is out to control the public with help from the government, including shit like SOPA, CISPA, and similar legislation.

It has positives and negatives. I agree overall though: American intellectual property laws (patents especially) have a stranglehold on innovation and creativity. They need to be brought into the 21st century.

No new gun control laws are needed, and liberal cocksuckers who want it need to get out of this country.

We need a way to keeps guns out of the hands of people who can't handle them, or better ways to defend against active shooters. Stricter gun control laws are the only proven effective way to lower the rate of gun related deaths.

(I know those last two will piss off a couple of people here).

Awwww here it goes.

Aah feels good to vent.

Feels good man.

At 10/26/13 02:39 AM, wildfire4461 wrote: This country is getting overun by socialists who want their money handed to them instead of working for it (which is why that POS is in the white house). Socialism has no place in this country.

You, and many just like you, have no clue what socialism is. All retards like you do not understand the sociological fact that people from lower socioeconomical background tends to stay in the same socioeconomical category. Meaning that kids born in poor families tend to stay poor for the rest of their lives. Kids suffer from the place they were born. They suffer a fate that was brought onto them because of the place they were born. Kids born with poor parents, go to bad school, with lower quality education and often in rough neighborhoods.

The fact is (and yes, I said fact, because that is a fact and not a silly judgemental opinion like yours) that kids who were born in these socioeconomical environements do not tend to make much more money or get much better education then their parents. And when they do, it's usually a few steps further. Like... having a salary that is a little better or stuff like that. It isn't true that kids who inherited from their parents and who went to the best schools because of their parents good salary "work harder" than the poor kids. You just live in your stupid neo-conservatism myth and you believe in stupid lies. When given proof and actual facts about how life actually works, you just look away and pretend they aren't there.

When you have a redistribution system, the point is to avoid reproducing the same inequalities. There is no reason why some kids should have an undeserved golden destiny just because they came out of the right vagina. And there is no way that other kids should be born-condemned. Sure, there are a few stories here and there of people who started from the bottom and who made it to the top, but those are exceptions. The reality is that people who are born poor, usually stay that way because they are raised in a system that reproduces these inequalities.

At 10/26/13 12:40 AM, Idiot-Finder wrote:
Not really, Afghanistan was somewhat justified, it was poorly handled however when it comes to the end game (even moreso than Iraq in my opinion for this thread :)

Also, conspiracies are generally retarded.

This one (well, two actually) will be a breaker but then again, that's the point of the thread ;)

I think GWB wasn't a bad president and people who hated him would have ranked Carter above him and they should go and fuck themselves.

Ron Paul is better off being a internet star rather than a politician considering the cult following he has, especially on YouTube.

I agree with both of those. Why would the Ron Paul thing be extremely unpopular? It's not really an insult to him. But yeah, I wouldn't say George Bush was a great president or even that good, but he is not even in the bottom 10 in my opinion and people are bandwagon critics when it comes to his presidency.

Sonic R is a good game with an amazing soundtrack, Sonic The Fighters is a well designed fighting game with solid gameplay and balanced characters (except Metal Sonic, but he's a boss that wasn't originally playable so he doesn't count), and all the Game Gear Sonic games are fairly good. Yes, even Sonic Labyrinth.

I'll be damned if one of you completely agree with me.

Brainwashed liberal society, economic collapse hit USA twice in a decade, moral collapse in almost every white societies, uncontrolled immigration, cultural marxism, everything happened after the 911.
Therefore, 911 destroyed western civilitazion.
Therefore, osama's (or probably aleins or jews) plan is successful.

At 10/27/13 11:22 AM, FordV8 wrote: literally the dumbest opinion ever

*clap* *clap* *clap*

At 10/25/13 03:13 PM, HollowedPumkinz wrote: 1. I find homosexuality to be an unnatural sexual preference and take the Nurture side on the Nature vs. Nurture debate.
6. I believe all able bodied Men should treat Women better than we treat ourselves and act courteous and polite towards them (open doors, give up seats, etc).

*tips fedora*                               

An unpopular opinion is that do not like cats which is impossible, because everyone likes cats

I will now be resurrecting the beauty of this theory and will also be pouring in my current unusual level of passion and intuition to magnify the sheer quality within the representation of this theory!

The theory, as it stands, will prove that the universe is alive sentiently, but not consciously. The objects we see are projections created by the sentient code that exists internally throughout the universe. An analogy I hope to be commonly exercised is that of a game chip and the world being created by the game chip. The universe externally is the game world, while the universe internally is the game chip. Information creates the world, the objects do not create the information like we appear to do. Information created our bodies as tools to weave in and out of the objective world and return back to our subjective default. The dream world is the subjective world, where our personal experiences are consulted subconsciously. Now, by no means does this mean we should claim ownership or claim identity, because in our dream world, we are not in control. In the waking world, we only delude ourselves into thinking we have control when we do not, thus why our emotions continue to over-ride our thinking when our threshold is punished, why we do not have control over what thoughts we have on the conscious surface at the time, or the ability to hold onto the painful memories/to let go (depending on if your subconscious is reacting to a prepared individual or a broken individual).

This theory will do some profound exercises that will quite possibly blow your mind. One of them being thoughts and psychical aspects being as alive as the grass outside of our homes. A rock does not move, or react to anything. A thought, an animal, a person and flora all mutate, grow and expand. Furthermore the expansion is dualistic and it contracts on itself alternatively. The planet itself, is like a physical heart that took form in a way we do not recognise as a heart. The planet's core energies expand and contract with systematical proportions to create the illusion of life. If the Earth did not spin, there would be no gravity. If the stimuli did not exist, there would be no reactions. If the energies did not exist, there would be nothing. It's all a magnificent system that is not created by a god, but rather forces of microscopic energies that react, expand, mutate and create/destroy dualistically. Bacteria is also an undermined sentient form of the universe that reacts and protects us from nature's destructive side. Like children to parents, we are children of the stars, and so we do not know why we are here or how we were created. In time we do figure out how our parents created us, but never do we know how we are created the way we are as we are.

I do have some other profound theories by using cross-examination, knowledge of dualism, inversionism and reflectism, while paying attention to the nothing we amount to compared to the static world that perpetually cycles through itself internally, but mutates into different forms on the surface. The things we do, say and create are not reflections of ourselves, but reflections of the universe. It's only logical to realize that the same thing that created us also facilitates all that we do, act and think. As I mentioned previously, the basics of process of elimination demonstrates certain doom to the entire world by taking simple pieces of the universe out of the formula. The theories are:

1. The universe is a cosmological heart. This would explain the expansion and contraction of the universe from the singularity. For all we know, the universe could might as well be a heart that takes light years beyond our imagination to beat. Let's also observe the fact that the smaller the life form, the faster the heart beats. It makes sense that a heart as big as the universe would take so long to make one beat. Furthermore, we are also scientifically advanced in knowledge with how the natural forces of energy in the universe are spread across space and time in the same way a heart produces blood throughout the body. Extensively, the universe is intrinsically the same system, but it uses different symbols throughout time to project itself into a more physical form. We are able to project ourselves, so clearly we are inhibited by the universe's inner workings. That being said, we can observe how highways, street lights, cars and roads can represent how the heart produces blood throughout the body (city) as well. Thus showing there are plenty of profound clues to the universe and what encompasses it by knowing how to tie our subjectively wandering selves to the physical realm and acknowledging the tools that we have which have no affiliation with our subjective thoughts - this is why Science is attacked by only subjectivists in theory, and attacked by objectivists in practice. Lastly, this is for Spiral Out; [color=#000000][b]if we can question our subjectivity, then we have the tools to create objectivity.[/b][/color] Our tools prove time after time that we live in both worlds co-existently, but the worlds do not correlate - they are two entirely different frequencies, which is why when you know how to lucid dream and experience your dreams on a more personal level, you will witness times where your body can experience white noise and heavy forces that shake the subconscious, sentient psychical aspect of yourself. Interestingly enough, by day our thoughts are dry and hard like we are on land, and by night our thoughts are wet and soft like we are in the ocean. I can tell you why I suspect this; the ocean we experience is the subjectivity (think of a moon, now imagine day being the full moon, and by night the moon is a new moon - or by day we are conscious, by night we are subconscious) we are slowly rubberbanding back into, as we are born only with subjectivity, while the reality we are in seems to be entirely focused on objectivity while the universe gave us the tools to interact with it outside of our 5 senses. If we were limited to our 5 senses, we would never realize how we all can see a cloud differently from one another. Here's another statement for Spiral Out, [color=#000000][b]Subjectivism is subjectively a truth, but objectively a lie.[/b][/color] I can prove this by placing a scientist next to a child - if you think this is an arguing-by-age fallacy, then I will place a scientist next to a full grown adult which is still a child at heart. Lastly, information is objective, but it's tangled up by our senses which then leads to the illusion of perception being subjective. If information was not objective, Science would fail on all accounts - it would also appear differently to any other beholder. The reason why it's not like this, is because Science recreates what objectively exists by using objective tools and placing subjectivity on the backburner to explore the world for what it is systematically, and not for what we think it is schematically.

2. I have a theory that we can tie how the ocean works to how space works. We can observe how whirlpools are identical to blackholes, but two different chemical reactions that are symbolically close to each other. My theory is that space is an ocean, but not the liquid we have here on Earth. It would also explain why Earth is made up of 71% water. Where did all water come from? Well, let's look at Mars. We see signs of water. If my theory is correct, it will reveal that water is not the signs of life, but rather the signs of the universe projecting it's forces in a form we perceive as water. Water only looks the way it does because of the forces that encompass the universe, so it's only logical to place our distinctions and labels on the backburner and start realizing the universe is not that mysterious.

3. The shadow we create by psychical dualism is instant the moment we exist. It is not the result of suppressing emotions and aspects. The shadow will always be the result of our non-shadow self. We are ignorant by default, so the shadow is the result of that ignorance. I do not think the shadow is a hole we created, but rather a hole created by anti-knowledge. The shadow is the negative result of having no information about anything (it really associates itself well to Peter Pan's story). The more we think and figure this world out, the more friendly the shadow becomes - in fact, we begin to see faces, definitions and most importantly, the people in our dreams will utter very wise statements that are entirely associated to our current problems. The more we seek for truth, the closer we are to the shadow; the more alive and clear the world inside us becomes. The shadow is that symbology we have in terms of being away from the truth. If you fight/fear the shadow, then you are running away from the truth. I have formed a bond between "I" and that shadow psychicly, and I can say that without that shadow teaching me my ignorance, I would not be as wise and profound as I am today. [color=#000000][b]It's time to take a stand for your psychical aspects when you are born into this world by natural affairs, but end up raised by nightmares.[/b][/color]

4. The spiral-form of galaxies is a mystery. This theory may give us an opportunity to demonstrate that galaxies can be cross-referenced to the spiral form of the DNA strand. This theory of mine will give us good reason to cross-examine the two. I really do not have much else on this, though. It's very worth the thought!

5. The brain is not the code, but the processor. The real encoder is the DNA strand. The brain would then have to be the processor, because the brain and DNA strand cannot be the same projection of the universe. This is also something I do not have much on, but have found the brain suspicious as an encoder rather than a processor. The brain always reminded me of a wired system, while the DNA strand reminded me of the computer chip.

At 10/27/13 11:37 AM, Insanctuary wrote: I will now be resurrecting the beauty of this theory and will also be pouring in my current unusual level of passion and intuition to magnify the sheer quality within the representation of this theory!

Oh boy here we go.

At 10/27/13 11:40 AM, Amaranthus wrote: Was kinda hoping he wouldn't come back.

It must be depressing to be naturally placed on a back burner because another mind comes in and changes everything you thought was, huh? ;3

At 10/27/13 11:43 AM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 10/27/13 11:40 AM, Amaranthus wrote: Was kinda hoping he wouldn't come back.

It must be depressing to be naturally placed on a back burner because another mind comes in and changes everything you thought was, huh? ;3

wankwankwankwankwankwank

At 10/27/13 11:43 AM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 10/27/13 11:40 AM, Amaranthus wrote: Was kinda hoping he wouldn't come back.

It must be depressing to be naturally placed on a back burner because another mind comes in and changes everything you thought was, huh? ;3

I got a philosophical question for you: how do you feel knowing I fuck your mom in the ass every week?

At 10/25/13 08:28 AM, kisame wrote: II2none is stupid as fuck.

I missed you too.

I think The Beatles are overrated.

At 10/27/13 07:22 PM, steph2568 wrote: I think The Beatles are overrated.

In my opinion, this opinion sucked balls.