Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 9/11/13 08:18 PM, Jester wrote: It's an unsettling enough concept, but I don't know how they would turn it into an hour+ long movie. I figure there'll be a lot of wide shots of Sandra Bullock quietly floating through space.

I imagine it'll be based off of the five stages of grief as Sandra burns through those wide shots at high velocity... I hope the ending doesn't disappoint me.

At 9/11/13 08:33 PM, Entice wrote:

The only way I think they could do it is to focus on a rescue mission or show her family bawing on Earth for a good portion of the movie

The IMBD cast list only has 5 people, but I guess it's incomplete since the movie's not out. George Clooney is in it, so his character must do shit at some point. Maybe it'll alternate between Bullock cruising around in space and Clooney doing a whole "we can't just leave her" thing.

At 9/11/13 08:35 PM, Slacker013 wrote:

I imagine it'll be based off of the five stages of grief as Sandra burns through those wide shots at high velocity... I hope the ending doesn't disappoint me.

Sounds plausible, but they'd still need something to break the monotony, I think.

in all honesty (and bias), i'd rather see a film with just two astronauts floating around in space and thinking of a way to get back home for 90 minutes rather than get dragged out to soulless romantic comedy #3,657, oh christ, more russian nukes gone missing, meaningless stoner bro comedy bullshit 8 or shit slasher movie soundtrack for clumsy teenagers to get laid by again

just saying

At 9/11/13 08:41 PM, Jester wrote:

Sounds plausible, but they'd still need something to break the monotony, I think.

From what I saw, Clooney was in space when the shuttle was destroyed so my guess is his name is in it just so they could tease you when they kill him in the beginning. Killing him at the beginning would show that their are no bounds leaving you to believe that Sandra has little to no chance of survival. In the end, some sort of cooperation between nations is going to happen to save her ass, I just wish the movie would show her burning up in atmosphere. Of course there is going to be a lot of fillers of her going insane as she waits for the joy of gravity to kick in...

At 9/11/13 07:48 AM, Slint wrote:

Lmao you should probably stop watching movies then, or stick with Twilight or something you fucking pleb.

I can tell your taste in movies is atrocious already.

At 9/11/13 05:32 PM, lolomfgisuck wrote: I like it when she screams like that.

</creepy guy>

I actually hate her sreams.
After seeing the trailer, I was turned off because I figured she'd be screaming like that for half of the movie.

I'll wait for the Redbox release; I won't pay 9+ dollars to see it in theaters.
For all who will see it soon, I hope that you are not disappointed.

Update this thread with your thoughts on the movie after you go see it.

At 9/11/13 11:05 PM, Shauna wrote:

At 9/11/13 07:48 AM, Slint wrote:

Lmao you should probably stop watching movies then, or stick with Twilight or something you fucking pleb.

I can tell your taste in movies is atrocious already.

You are incorrect.

At 9/11/13 11:29 PM, Sense-Offender wrote:

At 9/11/13 11:05 PM, Shauna wrote:

At 9/11/13 07:48 AM, Slint wrote:

Lmao you should probably stop watching movies then, or stick with Twilight or something you fucking pleb.

I can tell your taste in movies is atrocious already.

You are incorrect.

I see but only two that are enjoyable.

At 9/11/13 11:40 PM, Shauna wrote:

At 9/11/13 11:29 PM, Sense-Offender wrote:

At 9/11/13 11:05 PM, Shauna wrote:

At 9/11/13 07:48 AM, Slint wrote:

Lmao you should probably stop watching movies then, or stick with Twilight or something you fucking pleb.

I can tell your taste in movies is atrocious already.

You are incorrect.

I see but only two that are enjoyable.

Yeah, I think we've uncovered the issue. Your taste is questionable at best.

At 9/11/13 11:43 PM, Sense-Offender wrote:

I see but only two that are enjoyable.

Yeah, I think we've uncovered the issue. Your taste is questionable at best.

Comando, Silence of the Lambs, Marx Brother Movies, Predator, Mel Brooks movies, Terminator, THINGS THAT DON'T FUCKING SUCK LIKE THAT OTHER LIST.

At 9/12/13 12:03 AM, Shauna wrote:

At 9/11/13 11:43 PM, Sense-Offender wrote:

I see but only two that are enjoyable.

Yeah, I think we've uncovered the issue. Your taste is questionable at best.

Comando,

no

Predator,

double no

At 9/12/13 12:23 AM, Natick wrote:

At 9/12/13 12:03 AM, Shauna wrote:

At 9/11/13 11:43 PM, Sense-Offender wrote:

I see but only two that are enjoyable.

Yeah, I think we've uncovered the issue. Your taste is questionable at best.

Comando,

no

Predator,

double no

What's wrong with Predator? I like Predator.

But ja, Slint's list is a lot better.

At 9/11/13 11:40 PM, Shauna wrote: I see but only two that are enjoyable.

Let me stop you right here and say that any further opinions regarding movies from your part are automatically invalid since you're absolutely clueless about them and you have shit as fuck taste.

At 9/12/13 12:03 AM, Shauna wrote: Comando,

This I haven't seen yet.

Silence of the Lambs,

Yeah this is really really good.

Marx Brother Movies,

Haven't seen.

Predator,

This is really good.

Mel Brooks movies,

Haven't seen.

Terminator,

This is really good.

THINGS THAT DON'T FUCKING SUCK LIKE THAT OTHER LIST.

It's funny, you did list some pretty good movies, it's weird how you figure my list is bad.

You haven't seen any Mel Brooks or Marx Brothers movies, Slint? Get on that shit, dude.

Also, Commando is unintentional comedy gold.

It doesn't make me angry, because I won't watch it.

Internet badass here