Be a Supporter!

70 percent say no arms to Syria

  • 634 Views
  • 32 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic
Ceratisa
Ceratisa
  • Member since: Dec. 8, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 07
Gamer
Response to 70 percent say no arms to Syria 2013-06-28 11:50:06 Reply

At 6/28/13 11:41 AM, Fim wrote:
At 6/27/13 03:48 AM, Ceratisa wrote:
And anyway al Qaeda are only affiliated with al nursa at the moment, not the broader rebels. Al nursa is already classified by the US as a terrorist off shoot of the rebels so they wouldn't get anything anyway.
That's not accurate sorry, neither parts of the statement are.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099

I don't see the part where you prove it is the only affiliate in the conflict? Because it isn't which is what I said.
And guess what, when groups like this want something? They kill eachother and take it. Just like they have murdered aid recipients for food and other supplies.

tyler2513
tyler2513
  • Member since: Jan. 6, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 31
Gamer
Response to 70 percent say no arms to Syria 2013-06-29 11:11:02 Reply

At 6/27/13 09:39 PM, Th-e wrote: I had this weird thought: support the rebels, but only to a point that would maintain a stalemate.

That is quite the interesting thing to think about, but I think if the death toll get even more deadly than it has been for about a year now then the UN might actually be asked to get off it's bitch ass and do something about it. More importantly, much of the countries crude oil, minerals, things that keep the economy alive would be destroyed thus the U.S would loose even more interest in the nation. I think it this drags out for to much more the rebels will just forfeit.


BBS Signature
Tony-DarkGrave
Tony-DarkGrave
  • Member since: Jul. 15, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 44
Programmer
Response to 70 percent say no arms to Syria 2013-06-29 11:56:21 Reply

At 6/28/13 11:45 AM, Fim wrote: The irony is that that is exactly what the republican opponents to Syrian intervention are calling for ;) surely tony anyone who believes in the constitution and democracy. should unquestioningly throw bagfuls of assault weapons to throngs of angry Syrians from the back of a Red Cross jeep.

nope no firearms for them it has nothing to fucking do with us. why not have the UN and their shit Peace Keeping Force do it? America First. Also for future reference you can't distribute firearms from a red cross jeep seeing as they are a neutral humanitarian relief organization. its considered a war crime, like white flagging then opening fire on the guys who ceased fire.