Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/30/13 02:09 AM, ChloBro wrote: That doesn't mean I couldn't pay her to be a surrogate.
If I could pay enough, like $500k, I'm sure her husband would oblige.

does the idea of her possessing your genetic material inside her body while married turn you on

you don't really like her bone structure at all do you

this is all about you wanting power over her body

you're a sick rapist

At 5/30/13 02:13 AM, Sekhem wrote:

At 5/30/13 02:09 AM, ChloBro wrote: That doesn't mean I couldn't pay her to be a surrogate.
If I could pay enough, like $500k, I'm sure her husband would oblige.

does the idea of her possessing your genetic material inside her body while married turn you on

you don't really like her bone structure at all do you

this is all about you wanting power over her body

you're a sick rapist

I would embrace her like a lover if our offspring died before us, but my feelings for her are strictly scientific.

Now seems like a good time to tell you that I have a man-crush.
His name is Jared Padalecki.
He's super hot.

As for that woman?
Eh.

At 5/30/13 05:17 AM, ChloBro wrote: my feelings for her are strictly scientific.

That doesn't make you sound any less creepy m8

At 5/31/13 12:39 AM, anyapple wrote:

At 5/31/13 12:32 AM, Himynameisjacob wrote: Now seems like a good time to tell you that I have a man-crush.
His name is Jared Padalecki.
He's super hot.

10/10

I know right?
Also, he's 6'4 and at the time of that photograph benched 350 pounds.
For someone who isn't powerlifting, that's a damn good max.

I'm straight, I swears it.

At 5/29/13 11:24 PM, ThyGentleman wrote: I do not agree with feminism these days because they are trying to say that men are disposable, which is far from the truth.

Feminism is clearly not being represented right if that is what you are perceiving from its ultimate goal.
I do know that a lot of women are simply using feminism as a way to lash out at males for irrelevant reasons, although feminism is still something that needs to be around because -

Feminism was made to get equality. You ladies got it.

- of a statement like this, by itself. A lot of people think feminism does not need to be around anymore. This is not the case!

I agree with equality but I do not agree with Women trying to place themselves above men.

Agreed. Again, women who do this are not truly feminists- they are just angry at a specific person or a group of them, whether their anger is justified or not.

At 5/31/13 10:45 AM, Elitistinen wrote: They are just a group of angry hypocrites, put it to simplicity.

This is a very specific segment of females, and I would not call them feminists

At 5/31/13 12:05 PM, Elitistinen wrote: Of course, it's not feminist when 99% act the same way. Who want to be criticize?

They're not feminist if their not adhering to the goal of feminism --> I have found a few who actually realize this, and there is a lot of conflict inside their own community, with some feminists bashing others over what the definition actually is, and how there is a large portion of them misrepresenting their ideals.

I think they all need to straighten themselves out so that their actions are uniform, and not so narrowed and hateful. Only then will the message come clearly. This is true for any group of people, really. It's kind of tiring.

At 5/30/13 02:09 AM, Sevkat wrote:

At 5/30/13 02:08 AM, Revo357912 wrote: This poster seems like a trolle

OH GUYS WE HAVE AN OBSERVANT ONE AMONG US

* sip sip *

Is all anime drawn like that nowadays