Hammering down on Public Nudists

[naronic]

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/san-francisco-bans-
public-nudity-article-1.1213840

"Free-spirited San Franciscans have officially been stripped of the right to go buff in public.
City officials held a final vote on Tuesday to outlaw nudity in a raucous meeting at City Hall during which several attendees shed their threads in protest.
The half-dozen naked agitators shouted at members of the Board of Supervisors and were quickly seized by sheriffâEUTMs deputies armed with large blankets.
As they were hustled out of the chamber, two of the saggy-bummed nudists, one wearing only rainbow knee socks and another sporting thigh-high black nylons, shouted "Body freedom!" and "Shame on you!âEU

The board gave preliminary approval to the ban on Nov. 20 - protesters got naked at that hearing as well - and TuesdayâEUTMs 6-5 vote passed without any debate. (The vote was originally 7-4, but one board member changed her vote, saying she had become distracted, local CBS News reported.)"

[BumFodder]

'Murrica

[Provoke]

Welp, I'm out of a job.

[Cherry]

At 2/8/13 03:17 PM, naronic wrote: saggy-bummed nudists, one wearing only rainbow knee socks and another sporting thigh-high black nylons

that's not nudity they're wearing clothes

[dymck1]

I really don't care about nudists. To me it seems like they're rebelling just to rebel, I see no reason why you would want to be naked all the time. Clothes are practical. Maybe I'm just ignorant, but I don't know, it just all seems pretty dumb to me.

[Tony-DarkGrave]

fucking californians...

[4761]

How is public nudity defined in the case? Does this law affect nude beaches or are they the exception?

[Sekhem]

good

now they need to make it legal for police and security to taze them

[Tony-DarkGrave]

At 2/8/13 03:28 PM, Sekhem wrote: good

now they need to make it legal for police and security to taze them

I would love that its not like the LAPD cares about its record of police brutality anyways..

[Darthdenim]

At 2/8/13 03:33 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote:

At 2/8/13 03:28 PM, Sekhem wrote: good

now they need to make it legal for police and security to taze them

I would love that its not like the LAPD cares about its record of police brutality anyways..

The police are not any more immoral than anybody else in California.

[KillerSkull]

Sheriffs armed with blankets? Those are the nicest Sheriffs ever.

[Tony-DarkGrave]

At 2/8/13 03:36 PM, Darthdenim wrote: The police are not any more immoral than anybody else in California.

california is a shithole they people there are all idiots. especially the ones that run it.

[Sequenced]

I only wear clothes so that you don't see my random boners that would be considered inappropriate.

[Cyberdevil]

That's the basic human freedom they're messing with. Being yourself.
Shame on them.

[Painbringer]

At 2/8/13 04:20 PM, Cyberdevil wrote: That's the basic human freedom they're messing with. Being yourself.
Shame on them.

Exactly.

Oh well, they're taking a step backwards in the current social trend.

[Tony-DarkGrave]

At 2/8/13 05:38 PM, Painbringer wrote: Exactly.

Oh well, they're taking a step backwards in the current social trend.

I hope thats sarcasm, old and fat people showin off there goods in public is fucked up.

[Cyberdevil]

At 2/8/13 05:40 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: I hope thats sarcasm, old and fat people showin off there goods in public is fucked up.

Fuck censorship, I say let people dress or undress however they want. As long as they're not physically wounding people it shouldn't be a crime.

[zag]

At 2/8/13 03:25 PM, dymck1 wrote: I really don't care about nudists. To me it seems like they're rebelling just to rebel, I see no reason why you would want to be naked all the time. Clothes are practical. Maybe I'm just ignorant, but I don't know, it just all seems pretty dumb to me.

Clothing is fucking uncomfortable.
If I were more comfortable with my body and I had the choice, I'd never wear it.

[Tony-DarkGrave]

At 2/8/13 05:47 PM, Cyberdevil wrote:

At 2/8/13 05:40 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: I hope thats sarcasm, old and fat people showin off there goods in public is fucked up.

Fuck censorship,

theres a difference between Censorship and common sense.

[Ragnarokia]

Nudity is perfectly normal, many nudists exist and practice it as we would practice wearing clothes. Germany especially completely adores nudism and has nudist parks etc. in major cities.

Americans are becoming increasingly obsessed with sex. Why else would they claim it should be banned, nudism has nothing to do with sex or showing off the body or rebelling. Try explaining that to idiots who demand people shield their eyes from such things, ignorance.

[Painbringer]

At 2/8/13 05:54 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: theres a difference between Censorship and common sense.

If the clothing is not comfortable, what do you do? You take it off.

Common sense.

[thegarbear14]

At 2/8/13 06:14 PM, Painbringer wrote:

At 2/8/13 05:54 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: theres a difference between Censorship and common sense.

If the clothing is not comfortable, what do you do? You take it off.

Common sense.

lol.

too much "common sense" talk lately, but this is the only thing that is actually common sense....

[Boomstick]

I saw a group of nudists in San Fran once, on bicycles.

[Tony-DarkGrave]

At 2/8/13 06:14 PM, Painbringer wrote: If the clothing is not comfortable, what do you do? You take it off.

Common sense.

not in the complete nude in public. once again common sense.

[TheKlown]

Aren't the people who are usually Nudist the same type of people you don't want to see Nude usually?

[Tony-DarkGrave]

At 2/8/13 08:50 PM, TheKlown wrote: Aren't the people who are usually Nudist the same type of people you don't want to see Nude usually?

This also.

[Cyberdevil]

At 2/8/13 05:54 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: theres a difference between Censorship and common sense.

Common sense should apply to the minds of people, not the law.

[RE-Uploader8]

*sighs* Nudity is majestic. Don't hide it.