3D Action Driving Game3.64 / 5.00 5,956 Views
A paranormal curse is killing students at a high school...and you're next.3.59 / 5.00 5,698 Views
Help CrazyDad turn off a pesky neon sign or he’ll go crazy!3.54 / 5.00 8,426 Views
At 1/26/13 02:45 PM, LiquidFire wrote: Lets see the fact then.
Well, see, that isn't exactly how a debate (or evena court case) works. It's up to the claimant (you) to prove the claim that Anon is real.
At 1/26/13 02:14 PM, Elitistinen wrote: I don't deny that. Common sense people would figure out warhead thing is a joke. But Anons do exist. And it started in 4chan.
Exactly. Nothing more than a group of trolls.
At 1/26/13 02:09 PM, LemonCrush wrote:At 1/26/13 02:03 PM, Elitistinen wrote: Anyone can be Anon, so as no one. Right now I can redeclare I'm a reborn Anon but I wouldn't do that, I'm tired of all the craps they pull. Sum it up, no one know whether they exist or not.I know for a FACT, that Anon is not a real thing. It's a group of talented trolls. That's it. There's no nuke. There's no govt. conspiracy.
REAL secret societies are just that. Secret. They do not let their inner workings known. They do not go out of their way to be known. They do not put messages or symbols in mass media. They do not announce their plans like "govt. takeover".
So you probably think Anonymous is a secret society. But it isn't. The fact that almost all the members keep their identity secret doesn't mean it is a secret society itself. Anonymous is a group of hacktivists.
The only doubt about the existence of Anonymous IMO is that it may not be a group altogether but many groups which prefer to sign as Anonymous at their different activities.
Bitte meine beliebte Nazi mods, keine bannerino, weil ich auch ein Nazi Scwein bin! Danke schön
The warhead shit is real... they hacked several government defense worldwide. Confirmed in IRC, downloaded some sample archives, real shit, no way they can fake these.
At 1/26/13 03:03 PM, LemonCrush wrote:At 1/26/13 02:45 PM, LiquidFire wrote: Lets see the fact then.Well, see, that isn't exactly how a debate (or evena court case) works. It's up to the claimant (you) to prove the claim that Anon is real.
How come this didn't surprise me at all?
At 1/26/13 09:08 AM, Trillionaire wrote: Aaron Swartz was being prosecuted for these reasons
1. He was a founding member of the movement to bloc SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act
Which wouldnt have gotten pass regardless
2. He was a central player in WikiLeaks, devoted to releasing the truth about the war crimes which led to innocent deaths of Journalists and Civilians internationally
War crimes hardly that was collateral damage and wikileaks leaking classified information is illegal why do you think that bitch Bradley Manning is in prison?
He was arrested for taking millions of JSTOR scientific research papers dating from the 1800s to today, in order to bring scientific knowledge to the entire Internet.
He redistributed it illegally
You are probably one of those idiots who wants to make guns illegal and stop all "Internet piracy" if you don't think that what Aaron Swartz did was admirable.
I am a avid firearm supporter and E-pirate and what Swartz did was idiotic because he got to involved and he got caught.
Anon is simply nothing more than trolls now, and the only reason why everyone keeps bringing them up is because they hack websites in a facade of fighting for freedom and equality, and the fact that normal people would believe that is sad. This is exactly what Anon wants, stick their noses in places where they don't belong, use fear-mongering techniques and a movie meme to get their point across to whip up the ignorant masses, and sulk away in the anonymity of the Internet, wash, rinse, repeat. Why can't they go after Middle Eastern dictators or the Russian government instead, considering that they do far worse stuff to their people than anything that the government does here?
As for all this nuclear weapon crap, it's clear as day that it was metaphorical in nature, as they can't simply hack into a computer of an actual nuke and do what they want with it. Effective use of metaphors can convince anyone to do or believe in anything that they are told to do, especially when they pull off an attack beforehand.
Just stop worrying, and love the bomb.
Looks the same to me.
At 1/26/13 07:59 PM, Trillionaire wrote: Oh. Hahagahahaha. Hoooo hahahaha.
Cool name and sig and icon.
At 1/26/13 04:11 AM, Sword-of-Kings wrote:At 1/26/13 04:06 AM, LiquidFire wrote:Oh fuck. I clicked on the link. I guess they haven't gotten to me yet... I'd better go hide.At 1/26/13 03:59 AM, Xenomit wrote: Am I going to prison for clicking that linkYes. I clicked it and I'm already in prison.
I think you should be more concerned about the [bullshit] nuclear warhead headed toward you.
At 1/26/13 05:39 PM, Travis wrote:At 1/26/13 03:24 PM, Elitistinen wrote: The warhead shit is real... they hacked several government defense worldwide. Confirmed in IRC, downloaded some sample archives, real shit, no way they can fake these.No it's not.
They wouldn't put the power to shoot off warheads in a non-physical form.
Their procedures for launching a nuke aren't even a guarded secret, they have been discussed in interviews and distributed in educated media if any of the dim witted fools in this thread ever paid attention. As I mentioned earlier the power to launch the warhead rests in the hands of those stationed AT the nuclear warhead, they recieve the call and physically prime and launch the weapon. They use computers to help but it MUST be done by hand physically. It is absolutely impossible to launch without the physical input.
At 1/26/13 09:14 PM, Trillionaire wrote:At 1/26/13 09:06 PM, TB1ZZL3 wrote: Are people actually dumb enough to believe this? There is absolutely no way in hell access to a nuclear warhead would be made available from a public fucking web site.Read the thread.
Use your damn heads.
He did. Why don't you read it? It is blatantly obvious that he, me and Travis are talking about the people who are claiming it is a literal warhead. If you actually used your mind for a second you would easily notice that.
At 1/26/13 03:38 PM, LiquidFire wrote: How come this didn't surprise me at all?
Yeah, I suspected you wouldn't have any proof.
And as such, since you cannot prove your assertion that they are real, then I'm afraid I win this particular discussion.
At 1/26/13 09:40 PM, LemonCrush wrote:At 1/26/13 03:38 PM, LiquidFire wrote: How come this didn't surprise me at all?Yeah, I suspected you wouldn't have any proof.
Except you where the one who said your statement was a fact. And since you didn't have anything to back-up your fact, it might as well be shit you're pulling out of your ass.