Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

My speculation on this is that the government is looking for an excuse to launch a nuclear warhead somewhere in the world. I honestly don't think Anon. has the power to hack into a Government website.

At 1/26/13 02:03 PM, Elitistinen wrote: Anyone can be Anon, so as no one. Right now I can redeclare I'm a reborn Anon but I wouldn't do that, I'm tired of all the craps they pull. Sum it up, no one know whether they exist or not.

I know for a FACT, that Anon is not a real thing. It's a group of talented trolls. That's it. There's no nuke. There's no govt. conspiracy.

REAL secret societies are just that. Secret. They do not let their inner workings known. They do not go out of their way to be known. They do not put messages or symbols in mass media. They do not announce their plans like "govt. takeover".

At 1/26/13 02:09 PM, LemonCrush wrote:

At 1/26/13 02:03 PM, Elitistinen wrote: Anyone can be Anon, so as no one. Right now I can redeclare I'm a reborn Anon but I wouldn't do that, I'm tired of all the craps they pull. Sum it up, no one know whether they exist or not.

I know for a FACT, that Anon is not a real thing. It's a group of talented trolls. That's it. There's no nuke. There's no govt. conspiracy.

I don't deny that. Common sense people would figure out warhead thing is a joke. But Anons do exist. And it started in 4chan.

I'm Bernd, anon branch in Krautchan

Reading through this thread, and I don't think anybody read what they typed.

There's no nuclear warhead. Nukes or bombs are in no way shape or form involved with this. They're talking about data. The "warhead" is a virus. It's digital.

somebody set up us the bomb

They are spreading magnet link of the file, look real. (On main IRC right now)

Google cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://
www.ussc.gov

At 1/26/13 02:45 PM, LiquidFire wrote: Lets see the fact then.

Well, see, that isn't exactly how a debate (or evena court case) works. It's up to the claimant (you) to prove the claim that Anon is real.

At 1/26/13 02:14 PM, Elitistinen wrote: I don't deny that. Common sense people would figure out warhead thing is a joke. But Anons do exist. And it started in 4chan.

Exactly. Nothing more than a group of trolls.

At 1/26/13 02:09 PM, LemonCrush wrote:

At 1/26/13 02:03 PM, Elitistinen wrote: Anyone can be Anon, so as no one. Right now I can redeclare I'm a reborn Anon but I wouldn't do that, I'm tired of all the craps they pull. Sum it up, no one know whether they exist or not.

I know for a FACT, that Anon is not a real thing. It's a group of talented trolls. That's it. There's no nuke. There's no govt. conspiracy.

REAL secret societies are just that. Secret. They do not let their inner workings known. They do not go out of their way to be known. They do not put messages or symbols in mass media. They do not announce their plans like "govt. takeover".

So you probably think Anonymous is a secret society. But it isn't. The fact that almost all the members keep their identity secret doesn't mean it is a secret society itself. Anonymous is a group of hacktivists.
The only doubt about the existence of Anonymous IMO is that it may not be a group altogether but many groups which prefer to sign as Anonymous at their different activities.

The warhead shit is real... they hacked several government defense worldwide. Confirmed in IRC, downloaded some sample archives, real shit, no way they can fake these.

http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=whyvnnd6

At 1/26/13 03:24 PM, Elitistinen wrote: The warhead shit is real... they hacked several government defense worldwide.

lol

a digital nuke? how the phuyq?

Anon is simply nothing more than trolls now, and the only reason why everyone keeps bringing them up is because they hack websites in a facade of fighting for freedom and equality, and the fact that normal people would believe that is sad. This is exactly what Anon wants, stick their noses in places where they don't belong, use fear-mongering techniques and a movie meme to get their point across to whip up the ignorant masses, and sulk away in the anonymity of the Internet, wash, rinse, repeat. Why can't they go after Middle Eastern dictators or the Russian government instead, considering that they do far worse stuff to their people than anything that the government does here?

As for all this nuclear weapon crap, it's clear as day that it was metaphorical in nature, as they can't simply hack into a computer of an actual nuke and do what they want with it. Effective use of metaphors can convince anyone to do or believe in anything that they are told to do, especially when they pull off an attack beforehand.

Man... fuck.

At 1/26/13 06:24 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote:

bladda bla bla

Ahahaa. Haha. Hahahaha.

Oh. Hahagahahaha. Hoooo hahahaha.

Looks the same to me.

At 1/26/13 07:59 PM, Trillionaire wrote: Oh. Hahagahahaha. Hoooo hahahaha.

Cool name and sig and icon.

At 1/26/13 04:11 AM, Sword-of-Kings wrote:

At 1/26/13 04:06 AM, LiquidFire wrote:

At 1/26/13 03:59 AM, Xenomit wrote: Am I going to prison for clicking that link

Yes. I clicked it and I'm already in prison.

Oh fuck. I clicked on the link. I guess they haven't gotten to me yet... I'd better go hide.

I think you should be more concerned about the [bullshit] nuclear warhead headed toward you.

At 1/26/13 09:06 PM, TB1ZZL3 wrote: Are people actually dumb enough to believe this? There is absolutely no way in hell access to a nuclear warhead would be made available from a public fucking web site.

Use your damn heads.

Read the thread.
Read the thread.
Read the thread.
Read the thread.
Read the thread.
Read the thread.
Read the thread.
Read the thread.

Metaphor
A figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
A thing regarded as representative or symbolic of something else, esp. something abstract.

Anonymous.Operation.Last.Resort

I didn't see if anyone posted the link for the video. If not, here it is. It's definitely worth a watch.

At 1/26/13 03:38 PM, LiquidFire wrote: How come this didn't surprise me at all?

Yeah, I suspected you wouldn't have any proof.

And as such, since you cannot prove your assertion that they are real, then I'm afraid I win this particular discussion.

At 1/26/13 09:16 PM, Ragnarokia wrote: He did. Why don't you read it? It is blatantly obvious that he, me and Travis are talking about the people who are claiming it is a literal warhead. If you actually used your mind for a second you would easily notice that.

The only way you could interpret his post in the way you interpret it is by expanding the word 'this' as 'that the warhead and fissile material they are referring to is a physical nuclear weapon owned by an armed nation, not built by a private citizen, and that they have access to it through their infiltration of government computers'

Though that was obviously NOT his point, you insipid apologist.