At 1/11/13 10:51 PM, FattyWhale wrote:
The Constitution changes.
Certain things are added. Nothing is taken away.
If you do not want any changes to your right to bear arms, you should present sound arguments against that change, not completely silence any opposition.
The fact that they've gone beyond trying to convince the government to ban guns, and silence people, gives anyone the right to take them out of the equation. If they wanted to do it right, they wouldn't have fucked up and started silencing people.
And I'm not even going to go into how strongly I oppose gun bans. Mostly because I don't take them into account when I thing negatively about these guys.
and then silencing anyone who tries to stop them (2 broken rights, ah-ah-ahhh).The exact thing DDoS attacking will do??
Yeah. How many times do I have to say it? Ok, please, please listen this time so I don't have to say it again, you keep dodging it and it's annoying me. Any company or government that does wrong must face the consequences of their actions. If that be to completely dissolve the organization itself, so be it.
Do you not see the wrong-doing in first trying to have guns banned, and then silencing anyone who opposes them?
Do you really not see how that's a bad thing? When an individual breaks the law, they get punished. Organizations and companies are no different.
Yikes. Sorry, you're wrong if you think because someone is trying to change the constitution deserves to be stripped of their rights. I'm really not sure for which side you are fighting. You really seem to hold the 2nd amendment on a pedestal and step all over the first.
The freedom of speech is the most important one. Or at least one of the top three. The problem is, they're abusing it to get what they want. Thus, they don't deserve it. They're abusing the right for their own beniffit, and then crushing other people's freedom of speech.
How. Do. You. Not. See. This.
I think you need to figure out what you really want. A society where anyone who disagrees with you gets their basic freedoms taken away, or a society where people can debate things and come to a majority decision.
That's the thing. These people aren't debating things to come to a majority decision. They're trying to convince the government what they want, trying to make them think it's the majority decision, and then silencing all that oppose them.
It's starting to really annoy me how you keep overlooking that fact.