Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

these arguments should be waxed from my retinas

At 1/9/13 10:56 PM, JBK wrote: I wish there were more rules on what qualifies as child abuse or endangerment. Sure it is their child to raise but we're the ones who have to deal with it after you unleash your spawn into our world.

This is most definitely child endangerment.

This act itself isn't really all that bad, but just look at the picture, and read just the first two paragraphs. The 3 year old girl already looks like a toddlers in tiaras model, the mom is a stereotypical teen mom who also happened to have a show about being a teen mom on MTV, and has gone through thousands of dollars of plastic surgery.

It's really, really careless parenting, and I honestly do feel bad for the little girl, her mom is setting her up for a life of shit.

At 1/9/13 10:55 PM, Xenomit wrote:

At 1/9/13 10:54 PM, Urban-Champion wrote: holy shit what the fuck happened here

Yurgen fucked up, and tried to cover it up by bringing up dicks, and now he's gonna try to argue about how he's right because of some dumbass reason.

It's best to just ignore people like him.

whoa

i'd rather just not concern myself at all with this entire situation

At 1/9/13 11:04 PM, Urban-Champion wrote: whoa

i'd rather just not concern myself at all with this entire situation

Good idea

Xeno do you know what female circumcision is like?

Copied from a friend *Very graphic*
Female circumcision, more often than not, does NOT happen during infancy. It happens when she is a toddler OR OLDER. It usually happens without any sort of anesthetic. It usually happens WITH A RAZOR BLADE, and it usually happens OUTSIDE OF A HOSPITAL. The clitoris is removed. Sometimes even the inner and outer lips are removed as well. And after that, they sew her up, leave a small hole open so she can urinate, and the stitching is only cut open when she is expected to have sex on her wedding night, strictly for child-bearing purposes. And after she has that baby, depending on which country she lives in, THEY SEW HER BACK UP AGAIN. And that is assuming the girls even SURVIVE being circumcised. She can bleed to death and she can get infected and die from that as well.

At 1/9/13 09:05 PM, Cootie wrote:

At 1/9/13 08:30 PM, Ryanson wrote: If there hadn't been any waxing done, would the girl in question even care that she had a, and I quote, "unibrow"? Would it matter?

Not now. But in a year or two you would be sure as shit she would be bullied for it. Little kids are the WORST about bullying each other. One little wax strip doesn't even hurt that bad and I highly doubt the mother would continue if the kid seemed like she was being tortured.

If I could see a picture of the kid before the waxing...

Actually, I dunno. Would that change my opinion? I think it might, but then idk.

Yeah, you're right, kids can indeed be cruel. But why not worry about that as they cross the bridge? Or perhaps right before it? Hmm.

At 1/10/13 06:45 AM, ScarletVelvet wrote: Xeno do you know what female circumcision is like?

I'm going to be honest -- I didn't realize female circumcision was a thing. Jeeeessuuussss.

Another thing, Xenomit, just because the baby forgets pain doesn't mean it won't affect the infant anyway.

Please drown yourself Xenomit.

At 1/9/13 10:59 PM, yurgenburgen wrote:

At 1/9/13 10:49 PM, Xenomit wrote: If there's anyone wrong here, it's you. You're too fucking stupid to look at that little girl and very plainly see that the mom is doing everything possible to turn her into a premature slut,

Slippery slope fallacy.

and in the absence of that knowledge and in realizing how deathly wrong you were, you brought penises up out of nowhere to distract everyone from your fuck up.

I explained that the circumcision comparison was raised in order to highlight your double standard, which you have completely failed to defend.
Your accusation that I brought up circumcision to somehow distract people from my "fuck up" is both incorrect (i.e., you're wrong) and nonsensical; the only points I'd made so far in the thread were your arbitrary use of the word "autism" and that you had misdescribed your link.

Keep it up champ.

I think neither should be done. But omg this mom is serious a total fuck up that shouldn't be in charge of children's lives. She endangers her child for no reason, harms it for no reason (waxing hurts and the child protested), and is really insecure and dumb. She is setting the child up to have shitty self-esteem, to not feel good enough, and to be a shallow bitch. Hopefully the child turns out nothing like the mother but srsly some people should not be allowed to reproduce.

At 1/10/13 10:54 AM, Sprunk101 wrote: Please drown yourself Xenomit.

Who are you?

You're nobody

At 1/9/13 11:01 PM, Xenomit wrote: This is most definitely child endangerment.
It's really, really careless parenting, and I honestly do feel bad for the little girl, her mom is setting her up for a life of shit.

"Waxing a female child's eyebrows isn't that bad, but it should legally be considered child endangerment because eyebrow waxing possibly represents an entrance into a lifestyle that I do not approve of."

I shouldn't have to explain why that's the most retarded thing you've said today.

I could write a 2000 word essay on all the things that are wrong with that woman... I'll just simply say that the child is far too young for waxing... now, if the kid was of school-age, and was being made fun of, then use a razor blade...

At 1/11/13 01:02 AM, Xenomit wrote:

At 1/10/13 10:54 AM, Sprunk101 wrote: Please drown yourself Xenomit.

Who are you?

You're nobody

Yeah Sprunk you're not allowed to say anything! :/

The more she is abused, the greater the chance the child will flee home. Which is essentially good.

At 1/9/13 01:37 AM, Sekhem wrote:

At 1/9/13 01:35 AM, Xenomit wrote: He just meant that the mainstream media make attractive people seem superior to everyone els.

...because they are?

True that.