At 12/22/12 12:10 PM, ziniz wrote:
...it's quite disappointing. Y'know?
So, so true.
Since it's impossible to stop 5-voting fags from 5-bombing every single UJ submission, the admins should introduce a new legacy: deleting every submission with a score below 2.75/5.00 (at 200 votes). I think the blam thereshold is too low (1.60/5.00 at 200 votes), thus allowing 5-voters to gain their worthless saves much easier. Raising the minimum will counter the mass fives.
2.50/5.00 is literally 50%, and 50% in most nations is considered as 'Fail', thus NG should put the survival zone at 2.75 or higher. Besides, most rubbish, undeserving submissions have a score below 2.5, thus why keep them? Most submissions exit judgment with a score above 3.00 anyway. I know the minimum score is too harsh, but most submissions certainly DO end up with 3.00+. Not a single UJ submission had been blammed in the past few days.
Nowadays, you can vote on UJ flashes without even watching/playing it. I guess the save ratio increased because of this..."votin' without watchin', so I'll place my bet on da save cuz there's more chance for it being saved than blammed".
At 12/22/12 04:24 PM, Austerity wrote:
Ten years ago:
I am truly shocked.