What if we

[WhatIfWe]

...mandated abortions for all religious families?

Food for thought.

[Dawnslayer]

At 11/5/12 09:39 AM, WhatIfWe wrote: ...mandated abortions for all religious families?

Food for thought.

Nice way to kill off 98 percent of the population, or get yourself kicked out of office before you can say 'just kidding'. Not to mention a lot of atheists won't be born as a result. Or are you being more particular about how you define 'religious' people? Also, how are you defining 'family'? Does a single person qualify?

[leanlifter1]

What if we ban you by way of Ostracizing for such a waste of a thread.

[Iron-Hampster]

well it doesn't effect me so i still don't mind voting for you!

that's what democracy is all about. Majority vote justifies EVERYTHING!

[leanlifter1]

At 11/6/12 01:53 AM, Iron-Hampster wrote: well it doesn't effect me so i still don't mind voting for you!

that's what democracy is all about. Majority vote justifies EVERYTHING!

Actually "Secular Ethics" justifies things the majority just make you feel better about doing wrong "Cause every bodies doin it". "To be well adjusted to a profoundly sick sociaty is no measure of good health" Jacques Fresco.

[WhatIfWe]

The point is not to commit genocide, or behavioral eugenics. The point is to educate the populace, keep children from being raised by parents who have proven they are unworthy, and finally eliminate that strain of mental illness.

We cannot expect most people to vote their family to death. Optimally, we grandfather-in existing pregnancies, give scholarships to religious families who would convert from faith to fact, and allow "children of God" born illegally to be adopted by responsible and educated families.

[Verspar]

At 11/6/12 10:17 AM, WhatIfWe wrote: We cannot expect most people to vote their family to death. Optimally, we grandfather-in existing pregnancies, give scholarships to religious families who would convert from faith to fact, and allow "children of God" born illegally to be adopted by responsible and educated families.

I don't like how your thinking, you seem to be convince that religion is the devil. Now I'm not going to say that religion is good because its far from that, but you seem to make out that its the worst thing that we have. I'll admit it is primitive in our time, but you need to find a better way to bringing people together, and find a way that will bring the world together because I don't believe there is any such organization (including religion) that will do that for another hundreds of years.

All organization brings people together, but there's yet to be an organization to bring in everyone. What religion brought us that is good are stories, music, a code to follow, and a goal. If you know an organization the can do this and more, and have wide acceptance to everyone, then maybe we have something that is quite bigger and better than every world religion, but as of now, no. I mean there is reason rally, but not everyone dominantly think logically, but rather some think creatively. People come to America (both US and Canada) and complain about our culture and the likes. There are businesses that have solid ideas that many cannot accept. Religion has many followers, but seems to exclude those who don't follow the religion.

Is there any organization that will be accepted by all?

[leanlifter1]

At 11/6/12 01:05 PM, Verspar wrote:

All organization brings people together, but there's yet to be an organization to bring in everyone.

Is there any organization that will be accepted by all?

Internet.

[Verspar]

At 11/6/12 02:52 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:

At 11/6/12 01:05 PM, Verspar wrote: Is there any organization that will be accepted by all?

Internet.

Internet is not an organization, but a mode of communication. I can, however, imagine an organization on the internet that will flourish to bring people more together.