At 10/29/12 06:32 PM, Narcissy wrote:
At 10/29/12 03:58 PM, Insanctuary wrote:
Yea,h because getting into a giant orgy of teenage angsty retards is definately the way to go!You mean what you are?
That's the piss being beaten out of you talking.
Yeah, which is why I called you out on it, sir. Prove yourself, instead of trying to prove that you can prove against me. You will fail as long as you do not provide some backbone to this.I don't need to prove it to you, or anyone else. Many of your posts radiate it.
So you make an objective claim out of that eyeball lodged up your anal passage ways?
If you are going to take this out 2x in a row - -who knows what else you take out of context.No bing this time.
I'm not whining.Uhuh.
There's a difference.
I'm telling it like it is."If you believe in Heaven, something that can't be proven and/or disproved, you're an absolute retard. Fact."
If nobody can prove it, then whence cometh 'Heaven'? Whence cometh any 'concept' or 'idea' of 'Heaven'? Well, it obviously came from the mind's of idiots who also created the concepts of bigfoot, ghosts, fairies, werewolves, aliens and all other kinds of hocus pocus stuff. You don't speak that of which has 0 evidence in a realistic or objective manner, this would be called lunacy.
Whining is when you throw a fitOr complain in general. Which you do over a man's religious choice.
No, this is making a point that you are too narrow-minded to see right now.
for there is no 'my way'.Goodness me. Humility?
What of it?
This is about you.I'm flattered.
Not just you, but anyone else for that matter.
Sarcasm is not healthy for you.Oh my.
Oh my, you said ''oh my''.
It always does.Once, someone told me they'd give me a free sub-sandwich and did. Was a good truth.
We were talking about when truth hurts and not when it is good. That is irrelevant.
Why else are you people more offended by the truth than you are by the opinion?You seem to mix the two.
That's your problem. I don't mix them at all.
That is because it never was meant to be about truth.More about your opinion which you seem to pretend is a truth.
My factual and objectively based statement that you think is a opinion through your opinion?
You are simply having a pissing contest with me,You're getting closer.
You took no caution to hide this motive.
but my dick,Bing.
my heartIf I only had a heart.
and my brainWait, this was the first part. Let's start over.
No, no. You catch up, I'll wait here.
is way too big for your entire cloud of ignorance.This guy who thinks he's better than the majority of the world.
That's your eye riding up your ass again. I have never thought myself better than others, but people love to feel inferior when people do things they wished they could do.
No, you made an objective claim you could not back up objectively.This whole "argument" proves any point I claimed. You're a conceited, hateful individual who thinks he's better than the majority of the world. You're a dime a dozen. One thing you got going for yourself is a stronger vocabulary.
My vocabulary is not even that big, for fuck's sake. You literally got everything backwards here.
This is not eye of the fucking beholder.Bing.
Now you're contradicting yourself.
This is your eye being stuck far up your ass.Bing.
Now you really are contradicting yourself.
Now that's the eye of the beholder and your eye being stuck far up your ass.Bing.
Now this part was amusing. I liked the part where you said ''Bing.''
No, that would be your brain not being able to comprehend it, so you jump to retarded conclusion in attempt to condescend me.Boy, aren't you a hateful guy?
Not at all. I'm a passionate guy.
That's why there is only one throne because there is one king before those who follow the king, right? The majority don't rule... If that was so, we wouldn't be milked by the corporations.Majority can come in the form of money, as well.
No, no. This has nothing to do with power and that value you speak of is an illusion.
You clearly do not.No, I do.
You should wipe your ass with it instead.Bing.
No, you've stated it clearly. You played out the pot calling the kettle black concept very coherently. Don't even try to run away from the fact.I wasn't.
Then what were you doing, besides doing what you claim you weren't doing.
I thought you were writing nonsense.You mean the poetry you're writing?
No, I mean the textual vomit of yours. That alphabet soup for autistic children.
That would be you being a hypocrite about the eye of the beholder. You first state it as objective, then retreat to subjectivity then come right back out with more retarded objectivism you never had. In fact, you are lacking a lot of objectivity in your pants, sir.More insults.
Better than nonsense.More poetry.
Potettle.I like it.
I do, too.
But all kidding aside, I said you weren't contributing to the intelligence side. That's subjective, not objective. Why? You can be intelligent in different things. People can deem others to be completely idiotic for a variety of reasons. Attitude, beliefs (as you do with religion), spelling, skill-set, etc.
Uhh, your intentions were clearly attacking my philosophy -- don't even try to run away from it.
You claim religious people to be stupid because they're religious. You call them "retards." That's the thing about religion, you can't prove nor disprove. You also confuse morals with success or rule. I said majority rules, and for some reason you responded a generic "Hitler X as well." Okay, sure. I don't agree with him, but that doesn't hinder the majority rules statement.
They are stupid because they are religious. Mentally ill people who would rather live in fantasy before reality. They are selfish infantile monkeys trapped in their delusional world. No, I did not confuse morals with success and rule. Show me where I did otherwise.
My statement of saying you weren't contributing was my belief over your attitude not contributing to intelligence. Not for your beliefs (shitty as it may be), but you attacking a whole religious group.
Yeah, they are attacking the entire spectrum of logic, intellect and reason with their bullshit.
That's not to say you're not intelligent overall, I think you are. I think you're the type of person who would go about arguing with religious people unintelligent and make people who share a like-minded belief that you're against not think any favor of yours.
You've got me all wrong, again.
Over this course of an argument, with me poking and prodding you, you also showed how conceited you were. You said things such as calling me arrogant -- which was true, I was being very arrogant. But you also called the majority idiots. You showed yourself to be this individual who feels that he's superior to all others.
You mean my passion, right? This is not arrogance. The majority are clearly and unequivocally ignoramuses.