At 10/29/12 03:17 PM, Narcissy wrote:
At 10/29/12 03:08 PM, Insanctuary wrote:
No, I like to heat the discussions because fire brings forth the true face of our people. When the going gets tough; when people are pressured; all shields are down.You're on a forum. Not a political rally.
I just told you that when there are a lot of people, it generally bodes problems. Now you are instigating I want to be in a rally.
You've got me all wrong, sir. You know nothing of me and only jumped to an infantile conclusion of meAs did you, remember?
Saying I'm a pseudo-intellectual does not mean I am one. Therefore my conclusion was based off your lack of objective basis.
don't give a fuckBing.
Look at you taking my words out of context. I don't give a fuck, because I don't whine over trivial things that are personally subjected.
because I'm the one on these boards that has the balls to handle a heated debate while many of you cower and pull the victim card like sad sacks of hypocrisy.Arguing over the Internet is ballsy?
You'd be surprised how words can severely dismantle your entire ethos. The truth hurts, sir. Your argument doesn't. It never was truth. Maybe your sick and twisted self-appointed truth, but not truth nontheless.
Argument of quantity is not helping you right now.Majority tends to rule.
That is because of their mass stupidity and incredible walls of deeply rooted denial. They are no different than swatting a single bee compared to swatting hundreds of them. Quantity does not assure quality -- never will.
Hitler had many people who followed him.Yes?
Religion has so many followers.And?
God, the more people, the worse it gets.For the opposing side.
Which side is the opposing side, sir?
You have no idea how ignorant you sound when you say things like that.Have I introduced you to my friend Pot, Kettle?
Now you are going to imply hypocrisy in my words, while you continue to defelect everything I've sent your way surely to incinerate your arrogance towards me.
You don't get me and jump to silly conclusions. Your 'why' turned out to be subjective nonsense -- this is not surprising.Everything you said so far is subjective.
Not having an argument and saying ''you're a pseudo-intellect'' is making an attempt at an objective premise you should back up with objectivism.
Oh, I don't need to know you to know that your ideas and subjectivity is a crock of self-appointed knee-jerking. You really act like you are better than me, haha. Go on, convince yourself so, I will only keep breaking your petty facade.You and Pot seem to really be hitting it off. Good to know.
As long as you continue to ignore my points; you are no more or less an used inanimate object than the pot and kettle combined, sir.