At 11/1/12 05:31 PM, poxpower wrote:
At 11/1/12 05:27 PM, Saen wrote:
You seriously have no idea what you're talking about.Lol I'm pretty fucking sure I do son.
You should probably read your source before you just mindlessly google a term.
Biologists do not have a problem classifying humans all into one species, because we don't experience reproductive isolation (e.g. a population of humans on earth and a population of humans on mars which never interbreed) leaving no potential for evolutionary divergence.
Or more simply, the definition of a species is an issue for some species which rapidly mutate or evolve even when reproduction isn't isolated (e.g. bacteria, protists), but not an issue for most others.
What you've presented is a completely irrelevant tangent which you clearly know nothing about.
Abortion is not a philosophical subject, it is a biological, ethical, and legal subject. Taking well established definition and diction and throwing shit into the wind doesn't accomplish anything.
You've failed to argue from a pro-life viewpoint and continued along the path of a douche bag flunked-out political science student.