Be a Supporter!

Obama should not be in power.

  • 3,883 Views
  • 140 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic
Slacker013
Slacker013
  • Member since: Oct. 2, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Audiophile
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 00:31:54 Reply

At 10/13/12 12:18 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:
It's not justifiable as the War on Afghanistan is where it all started 10 years ago and officially it has ended but then what is the justification of this current war on Iraq and why would Obama bring the troops home from Iraq and "End the War" when he already did what he said he would do which was to end the war on Afghanistan. We seem to forget to fast.

I don't have all the answers... I'm a fucking slacker who might have to work in 5 hours... and I wish you luck... cause I have one hell of a time understanding you. Goodnight.


Once upon a time...

Kwing
Kwing
  • Member since: Jul. 24, 2007
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 45
Game Developer
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 01:18:28 Reply

At 10/10/12 10:16 AM, leanlifter1 wrote: Why try and back up a lying war monger and Wall Street man heck he could be a murder and you would still justify his actions. People that have the ability to create solutions in society include engineers, tradesmen, architects, scientists, mathematicians, properly trained teachers & Philosophers, etc. Politics try and keep things archaic and subservient to the ruling monarchy.

Then why don't we elect an engineer, tradesman, architect, scientist, mathematician, properly trained teacher or philosophers?

At 10/10/12 12:01 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: That's not the point the point is you have a Dictator for a 4 year reign.

Republicans have voted against everything Obama has done or tried to do, moreso than with any other president. You're talking about dictatorship? Why don't you go criticize a president who was given the means to do whatever they wanted to? Namely Bush and his spying on the American people...

At 10/11/12 01:21 AM, Thecrazyman wrote: First thing he promised to bring troops back home was the first promise he broke, again this is one of the big reasons why our current President shouldn't be re-elected, broken promises bring corruption to one's inner self.

I'm not crazy about Obama myself, but I think singling him out for his lack to fulfill a promise is kind of a lame thing to pin on him. Maybe the fact that he allowed NDAA to pass would be something more solid to use against him, but I can't think of a single president that didn't break a promise.

At 10/12/12 07:04 PM, Warforger wrote: If you don't vote they don't have a reason to care about you, all they have to do is go after people who will.

That's really bad logic. Someone's going to win the election either way, you might as well pick the lesser of two evils. If you want to protest, do it with words. Inaction won't do shit.

At 10/12/12 09:22 PM, Slacker013 wrote: I remember my dad telling me someone I know is a part of the last regiment to be shipped off to Afghanistan but I just can't remember who it was. Try looking at the war on terror in a tactical point of view, backing out isn't as easy as its seem. We can't just turn our back on them and walk away cause they're the kind that will take advantage of that. Tell me how you'd do it, I want to know!

I think it would be irresponsible for us to just pull out of the war right now, given that we've totally screwed up most of the middle east. But if we did, I don't think there would be many consequences as far as terrorists attacking us. We haven't had very many terrorists trying to invade the US, plus the 9/11 attacks were planned. I guess it could fall into debate whether it was an inside job or not, but between the vanishing plane, the third building that went down, the news that reported the attacks before they happened, etc. I would say at the very least our government gave Al Qaeda the green light.

At 10/12/12 09:53 PM, TucoM wrote: Obama is a gun toting, pro military, religious nut? OK, he does love drone strikes, but he really, really hates what is in my gun cabinet.

Who knows what Obama thinks and wants, and who cares? Mitt Romney was in the middle back in the day, but he has to project a far right ideology to get votes. Similarly, Obama has to say or do whatever liberals will like. What he as a person has a problem with is inconsequential; his personal preferences will never be made clear to the public.


If I offer to help you in a post, PM me to get it. I often forget to revisit threads.
Want 180+ free PSP games? Try these links! - Flash - Homebrew (OFW)

Poniiboi
Poniiboi
  • Member since: Mar. 1, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Musician
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 08:53:20 Reply

At 10/12/12 08:09 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
At 10/12/12 07:47 PM, SenatorJohnDean wrote: To Everybody who doesn't like Obama in power: let's all go back to anarchy. You start.
The fuck are you talking about?

Apparently you people don't appreciate brevity. And I don't care.

All I see here are the same old "I hate everybody but I'm not going to actually DO anything so fuckit just close your eyes and vote" comments. BOOOORING.


no, really...DON'T CLICK THE PIC

BBS Signature
leanlifter1
leanlifter1
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 10:20:10 Reply

At 10/13/12 12:27 AM, Slacker013 wrote:

Sure we fought them and people died but they did more running then fighting.

This is not a fight it is a slaughter and I hope you realize that wars are not fought with courage and valor like the movies try and brainwash you into thinking on the contrary wars are won by machines and bombs dropped from many moons away in the comfort of an arm chair. When you say fight that means two willing opponents that both have an equal chance and if you think the Arabs have an equal chance than you are sadly mistaken.


BBS Signature
leanlifter1
leanlifter1
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 10:28:01 Reply

At 10/13/12 01:18 AM, Kwing wrote:
Then why don't we elect an engineer, tradesman, architect, scientist, mathematician, properly trained teacher or philosophers?

You seem to think we have a choice in the matter as voting citizens LOL.

Republicans have voted against everything Obama has done or tried to do, moreso than with any other president. You're talking about dictatorship? Why don't you go criticize a president who was given the means to do whatever they wanted to? Namely Bush and his spying on the American people...

There all to blame and there all the same man.


BBS Signature
LemonCrush
LemonCrush
  • Member since: Sep. 9, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 13:30:57 Reply

At 10/13/12 12:01 AM, Slacker013 wrote:
At 10/12/12 11:54 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
Obama is proof that the majority of the public or many of them are gullible.
Have you ever watched the South Park episode where the kids were voting on a new mascot and they only could choose between a giant douche or a turd sandwich? That's kind of how things have been going down lately... I don't believe an independent is going to win the election. I sure as hell don't want Romney to win though... you talk about the end of a war then you can't wait till he is in office!

Which speeches are you thinking of where Romney is doing any sabre rattling? Or at least more sabre rattling than Obama has?

leanlifter1
leanlifter1
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 13:34:00 Reply

At 10/13/12 01:30 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
Which speeches are you thinking of where Romney is doing any sabre rattling? Or at least more sabre rattling than Obama has?

I don't know just what as you say "sabre rattling" is but perhaps you can exsplane your point in better detail.


BBS Signature
LemonCrush
LemonCrush
  • Member since: Sep. 9, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 13:34:41 Reply

At 10/12/12 11:46 PM, Slacker013 wrote:
At 10/12/12 11:39 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
Hi, Obama's been president for 4 years
And I hope he stays elected so we don't end up backing Israel in a war that will lead to WW3. Bush was president at the start and his family made a buck or 2 war profiteering... we've had chances to kill Bin Laden during his term in office but I think he was just stalling.

Wait, wait, wait. Are you actually suggesting that Obama doesn't back Israel?! We have sent 12 billion dollars to them n Obama's term...are you on crack?

LemonCrush
LemonCrush
  • Member since: Sep. 9, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 13:36:36 Reply

At 10/13/12 01:34 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
At 10/13/12 01:30 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
Which speeches are you thinking of where Romney is doing any sabre rattling? Or at least more sabre rattling than Obama has?
I don't know just what as you say "sabre rattling" is but perhaps you can exsplane your point in better detail.

It was suggested that Mitt Romney was somehow "pro-war". I'm wondering what speeches Romney has given that indicate a "pro-war" stance, and why he is thought of as more "pro-war" than Obama is.

How many drone strikes and assassinations has Mitt Romney authorized?

LemonCrush
LemonCrush
  • Member since: Sep. 9, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 13:37:47 Reply

At 10/12/12 11:53 PM, Slacker013 wrote:
And the first 2 said exactly my point "between nations" we aren't at war with the nation of Afghanistan. Geneva code would agree as well as the people we are fighting.

Actually number 1 says "parties within a nation".

Warforger
Warforger
  • Member since: Mar. 8, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 06
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 16:43:01 Reply

At 10/13/12 01:36 PM, LemonCrush wrote: It was suggested that Mitt Romney was somehow "pro-war". I'm wondering what speeches Romney has given that indicate a "pro-war" stance, and why he is thought of as more "pro-war" than Obama is.

How many drone strikes and assassinations has Mitt Romney authorized?

If you saw the convention he called ending the Iraq war a "mistake". He's also called Russia our greatest Geo-political foe and if you saw the VP debates Ryan keeps bringing up Russia obstructing sanctions on Iran (like Russia is alone on that). Obama on the other hand has just increased sanctions, despite what Ryan tried to say in the VP debates the sanctions are devastating Iran, their economy is tanking and they have something like 25% inflation. Now Obama has been more aggressive in negotiations with Iran than Bush was which Ryan referenced how he took options away from Iran in terms of negotiations but he's only proposed cuts to The Department of Defense while Romney has tried increasing Defense spending in his budget (which the Department of Defense has said it actually wants less money because it's running out of things to spend it on that it needs).


"If you don't mind smelling like peanut butter for two or three days, peanut butter is darn good shaving cream.
" - Barry Goldwater.

BBS Signature
Slacker013
Slacker013
  • Member since: Oct. 2, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Audiophile
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 20:33:18 Reply

At 10/13/12 01:34 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
Wait, wait, wait. Are you actually suggesting that Obama doesn't back Israel?! We have sent 12 billion dollars to them n Obama's term...are you on crack?

I'm suggesting that we don't elect someone who seems to have an invasion plan in mind...


Once upon a time...

LemonCrush
LemonCrush
  • Member since: Sep. 9, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 20:59:01 Reply

At 10/13/12 08:33 PM, Slacker013 wrote:
At 10/13/12 01:34 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
Wait, wait, wait. Are you actually suggesting that Obama doesn't back Israel?! We have sent 12 billion dollars to them n Obama's term...are you on crack?
I'm suggesting that we don't elect someone who seems to have an invasion plan in mind...

WTF? Where has Mitt Romney mentioned anything about the US invading anything, or it's supporting it's allies invading someone?

leanlifter1
leanlifter1
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 21:12:14 Reply

At 10/13/12 08:59 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
WTF? Where has Mitt Romney mentioned anything about the US invading anything, or it's supporting it's allies invading someone?

Obama did not have any plans to invade Iraq.


BBS Signature
Slacker013
Slacker013
  • Member since: Oct. 2, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Audiophile
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 21:18:42 Reply

At 10/13/12 08:33 PM, Slacker013 wrote:
"who seems"

Key word there...


Once upon a time...

LemonCrush
LemonCrush
  • Member since: Sep. 9, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 22:04:12 Reply

At 10/13/12 09:12 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
Obama did not have any plans to invade Iraq.

Nor did Mitt Romney.

leanlifter1
leanlifter1
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 22:18:16 Reply

At 10/13/12 10:04 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
At 10/13/12 09:12 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
Obama did not have any plans to invade Iraq.
Nor did Mitt Romney.

Obama's regime did invade Iraq.


BBS Signature
Camarohusky
Camarohusky
  • Member since: Jun. 22, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 09
Movie Buff
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 22:26:25 Reply

At 10/13/12 10:18 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Obama's regime did invade Iraq.

Please provide sources. Thanks.

leanlifter1
leanlifter1
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 22:32:30 Reply

At 10/13/12 10:26 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
At 10/13/12 10:18 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Obama's regime did invade Iraq.
Please provide sources. Thanks.

Are you for real ?


BBS Signature
Warforger
Warforger
  • Member since: Mar. 8, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 06
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 23:12:21 Reply

At 10/13/12 10:32 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Are you for real ?

So you honestly think that Obama invaded Iraq, or his regime did? I guess you mean the regime installed since 1788 or something. If you honestly think Obama invaded Iraq, read the wiki article to gain some basic knowledge everyone who is now above the age of 12 knows.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War


"If you don't mind smelling like peanut butter for two or three days, peanut butter is darn good shaving cream.
" - Barry Goldwater.

BBS Signature
leanlifter1
leanlifter1
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 23:18:00 Reply

At 10/13/12 11:12 PM, Warforger wrote:
At 10/13/12 10:32 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Are you for real ?
So you honestly think that Obama invaded Iraq, or his regime did? I guess you mean the regime installed since 1788 or something. If you honestly think Obama invaded Iraq, read the wiki article to gain some basic knowledge everyone who is now above the age of 12 knows.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War

Did Obama pull rank and make and executive decision to stop operations of mass destruction and death in Iraq no he did not so I propose you sit down &ST suckin thing up because I have had enough Fascism for one day thank you very much :-)


BBS Signature
Camarohusky
Camarohusky
  • Member since: Jun. 22, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 09
Movie Buff
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 23:49:25 Reply

At 10/13/12 10:32 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Are you for real ?

Seeing as it is fairly common knowledge that Bush invaded Irag 5 years before Obama was elected, yes I am for real.

Prove that Obama invaded Iraq.

LemonCrush
LemonCrush
  • Member since: Sep. 9, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 23:49:36 Reply

At 10/13/12 12:12 AM, Slacker013 wrote:

:Elect Romney and we can say hello to Iran!

Link?

Slacker013
Slacker013
  • Member since: Oct. 2, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Audiophile
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-13 23:58:35 Reply

At 10/13/12 11:49 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
Link?

Go get yourself a television kid...

At SEARS


Once upon a time...

leanlifter1
leanlifter1
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-14 00:02:49 Reply

At 10/13/12 11:49 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
At 10/13/12 10:32 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Are you for real ?
Seeing as it is fairly common knowledge that Bush invaded Irag 5 years before Obama was elected, yes I am for real.

Prove that Obama invaded Iraq.

So that makes it alright NOT ! Obama is as guilty for crimes against Humanity than is Bush and Cheney.


BBS Signature
Camarohusky
Camarohusky
  • Member since: Jun. 22, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 09
Movie Buff
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-14 00:08:50 Reply

At 10/14/12 12:02 AM, leanlifter1 wrote: So that makes it alright NOT !

That's not what you claimed. You claimed Obama invaded Iraq.

Obama is as guilty for crimes against Humanity than is Bush and Cheney.

OK. What for?

leanlifter1
leanlifter1
  • Member since: Sep. 30, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 01
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-14 00:09:26 Reply

At 10/13/12 11:58 PM, Slacker013 wrote:
At 10/13/12 11:49 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
Link?
Go get yourself a television kid...

At SEARS

TV aka idiot box is for sheep


BBS Signature
Slacker013
Slacker013
  • Member since: Oct. 2, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Audiophile
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-14 00:13:07 Reply

At 10/14/12 12:09 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:
At 10/13/12 11:58 PM, Slacker013 wrote:
At 10/13/12 11:49 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
Link?
Go get yourself a television kid...

At SEARS
TV aka idiot box is for sheep

Computer aka giant calculator... the idiots who watch television are probably your number one source. Congrats for getting your news from a third party. That would make you... a uber idiot


Once upon a time...

Feoric
Feoric
  • Member since: Mar. 20, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-14 00:20:53 Reply

At 10/14/12 12:09 AM, leanlifter1 wrote: TV aka idiot box is for sheep

Do you consider Alex Jones and/or abovetopsecret a credible source for anything?

Warforger
Warforger
  • Member since: Mar. 8, 2009
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 06
Blank Slate
Response to Obama should not be in power. 2012-10-14 00:21:52 Reply

At 10/13/12 11:18 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Did Obama pull rank and make and executive decision to stop operations of mass destruction and death in Iraq no he did not so I propose you sit down &ST suckin thing up because I have had enough Fascism for one day thank you very much :-)

Yes, he did. Now please stop claiming Obama expanded the Iraq war in any way shape or form.


"If you don't mind smelling like peanut butter for two or three days, peanut butter is darn good shaving cream.
" - Barry Goldwater.

BBS Signature