Stern Exposes Obama Supporters

[TheKlown]

Howard Stern Exposes Obama Supporters

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SeJbO U4nmHQ

http://www.westernjournalism.com/howard-stern-exposes-obama-
supporters/

I will not be replying to this topic because I know it will just create a flame war between liberals and conservatives. I am just posting this video so you can all form your own opinion about this video.

If you leave any responses on this topic, please do not flame each other. Newgrounds is against flaming each other, so do not call each other idots, morons, or anything negative. Thank you, if you flame each other than you're the one asking for a ban.

[Feoric]

Yeah these cherry picked interviews for the Howard fucking Stern show are indicative of every Obama supporter. EXPOSED.

[RightWingGamer]

This just in: radio comedian reveals that stupid people on the street are in fact stupid.

Though, in fairness, he did make the good point that as long as a politician has their name out there, the people don't give a purple piss about anything beyond that.

[Entice]

At 9/28/12 05:30 PM, TheKlown wrote: If you leave any responses on this topic, please do not flame each other. Newgrounds is against flaming each other, so do not call each other idots, morons, or anything negative.

The topic of the title is baited.

Thank you, if you flame each other than you're the one asking for a ban.

You know this from personal experience, presume?

[Entice]

At 9/28/12 05:30 PM, TheKlown wrote: If you leave any responses on this topic, please do not flame each other. Newgrounds is against flaming each other, so do not call each other idots, morons, or anything negative.

The title of this topic is baited.

Thank you, if you flame each other than you're the one asking for a ban.

You know this from personal experience, I presume? I have a hard time telling if the last two paragraphs are satirical, if you're just trolling, or if you're being genuine.

I dun know how I fucked up my last reply so badly.

[Elfer]

Yeah this is more like "Howard Stern Exposes the Main Failing of the Modern Democratic System"

[Warforger]

You do realize you can find the same type of footage for Republican supporters too right? It's not really indicative of anything.

[24901miles]

He's 25 from New Jersey. Clearly he's just trying to start a debate where we can see the hilarious disparity between a Conservative and Liberal point of view on the same discussion.

[dark-fox]

I'm surprised he's still relevant, it's kinda sad that he still is, I mean, what has he done besides piss people off, distort facts and generally act like a douche?

[naronic]

HUR HUR HUR, STUPID ROMNEY SOHPPORTER EXPERZED, ALL ROMNEY SOHPPORTERS ARE LIKE THIS

[naronic]

MORE EVIDENCE THAT THE GOP IS COMPRISED ENTIRELY OF MAD PEOPLE...

[Korriken]

my turn!

Obama's a socialist!

[Feoric]

At 10/1/12 08:46 PM, Korriken wrote: Obama's a socialist!

As a democratic socialist myself, I wish he was! Turns out he's a lukewarm centrist that supports neoliberal economic policies and is fairly compatible with bush-era foreign policy.

Oh, you mean redistribution of wealth? What do you think social security is?

[RacistBassist]

At 10/1/12 08:53 PM, Feoric wrote: As a democratic socialist myself, I wish he was! Turns out he's a lukewarm centrist that supports neoliberal economic policies and is fairly compatible with bush-era foreign policy.

Oh, you mean redistribution of wealth? What do you think social security is?

I always laugh as the people on the left try to claim Obama as a centrist. Bitch please, as a somewhat centrist, that ninja ain't no centrist

[Feoric]

At 10/1/12 10:43 PM, RacistBassist wrote: I always laugh as the people on the left try to claim Obama as a centrist. Bitch please, as a somewhat centrist, that ninja ain't no centrist

That depends on where you place the Overton Window. What's your scale?

[Camarohusky]

At 10/1/12 10:48 PM, Feoric wrote: That depends on where you place the Overton Window. What's your scale?

Noticeably right of center.

[Proteas]

At 10/1/12 10:43 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 10/1/12 08:53 PM, Feoric wrote: As a democratic socialist myself

as a somewhat centrist

As someone who doesn't give two shits about labeling himself as ANYTHING just to claim superiority over others for my viewpoints, I think you're both getting horribly off-topic. Weren't we supposed to discuss how stupid the less than 30% of the voting population who decides who wins the election can be?

[Feoric]

At 10/1/12 11:14 PM, Proteas wrote:

At 10/1/12 10:43 PM, RacistBassist wrote:

At 10/1/12 08:53 PM, Feoric wrote: As a democratic socialist myself

as a somewhat centrist

As someone who doesn't give two shits about labeling himself as ANYTHING just to claim superiority over others for my viewpoints, I think you're both getting horribly off-topic.

By making a point to declare that you're above labeling yourself, you are, in essence, labeling yourself, by claiming superiority over labels. Funny how that works, huh?

There really isn't anything to discuss here other than posting youtube videos of low information voters to generalize ideologues, so I guess a better topic of discussion is why this is dumb and the fact that it is, ironically, a tactic used by low information voters.

[Proteas]

At 10/1/12 11:41 PM, Feoric wrote: By making a point to declare that you're above labeling yourself, you are, in essence, labeling yourself, by claiming superiority over labels. Funny how that works, huh?

I never claimed to be perfect, just above the petty bullshit that certain fevered egos in this forum are susceptible to. The way some of you self-define yourselves makes me think you're still in high-school boasting about what label clothing you wear. And quite frankly? It turns my stomach, as if anybody on here quite frankly gives a damn what your specific political affiliation is, or as if stating that affiliation will somehow lend credence to what you say.

[24901miles]

At 10/2/12 12:47 AM, Proteas wrote: labels

Labels save time and demonstrate an understanding of multiple well-defined political stances relative to your own.

Unless it's a book, I usually stop reading when someone launches into that high school "I'm too good to stereotype anything" tirade.

[Proteas]

At 10/2/12 01:09 AM, 24901miles wrote: Labels save time and demonstrate an understanding of multiple well-defined political stances relative to your own.

Labels also lend themselves to people who like to argue about what that label defines, or qualifies them to define.

[Feoric]

At 10/2/12 12:47 AM, Proteas wrote: I never claimed to be perfect, just above the petty bullshit that certain fevered egos in this forum are susceptible to.

If there's anyone in this thread displaying an inflated ego, it's you.

The way some of you self-define yourselves makes me think you're still in high-school boasting about what label clothing you wear. And quite frankly? It turns my stomach, as if anybody on here quite frankly gives a damn what your specific political affiliation is, or as if stating that affiliation will somehow lend credence to what you say.

Yes, god forbid someone posting in the Politics forum state what belief system they subscribe to, especially in the context of debunking a laughable myth that Obama is somehow a socialist, when he clearly is not. Your pretentious ramblings actually make you seem more applicable to the "high-school boasting' than anyone else here.

[Proteas]

At 10/2/12 02:42 AM, Feoric wrote: Yes, god forbid someone posting in the Politics forum state what belief system they subscribe to, especially in the context of debunking a laughable myth that Obama is somehow a socialist, when he clearly is not. Your pretentious ramblings actually make you seem more applicable to the "high-school boasting' than anyone else here.

Nobody on here gives a damn what your actual political affiliation is, and you know it. If you can't defend your ideas rationally without trying to puff yourself up by displaying your political affiliation like peacock feathers, chances are your ideas SUCK to begin with.