Be a Supporter!
Contraband678
Contraband678
  • Member since: Sep. 16, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Net Neutrality 2012-09-26 11:53:48 Reply

For or Against? Explain.

Camarohusky
Camarohusky
  • Member since: Jun. 22, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 09
Movie Buff
Response to Net Neutrality 2012-09-26 12:41:03 Reply

At 9/26/12 11:53 AM, Contraband678 wrote: For or Against? Explain.

Add a paragraph explaining the definition of net neutrality and then maybe I'll put in my 2 cents.

Contraband678
Contraband678
  • Member since: Sep. 16, 2012
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to Net Neutrality 2012-09-26 12:46:53 Reply

At 9/26/12 12:41 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
At 9/26/12 11:53 AM, Contraband678 wrote: For or Against? Explain.
Add a paragraph explaining the definition of net neutrality and then maybe I'll put in my 2 cents.

Here's a few paragraphs on the subject straight from wikipedia:

Wikipedia wrote:
Network neutrality (also net neutrality, Internet neutrality) is a principle that advocates government regulation of Internet service providers[1], preventing ISPs from restricting consumers' access to networks that participate in the Internet. Specifically, network neutrality would prevent restrictions on content, sites, platforms, types of equipment that may be attached, and modes of communication. Network owners can't interfere with content, applications, services, and devices of users' choice and remains open to all users and uses.[2][3][4]

Since the early 2000s, advocates of net neutrality and associated rules have raised concerns about the ability of broadband providers to use their last mile infrastructure to block Internet applications and content (e.g. websites, services, and protocols), and even block out competitors. (The term "net neutrality" didn't come into popular use until several years later, however.) The possibility of regulations designed to mandate the neutrality of the Internet has been subject to fierce debate, especially in the United States.

Neutrality proponents claim that telecom companies seek to impose a tiered service model in order to control the pipeline and thereby remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and oblige subscribers to buy their otherwise uncompetitive services. Many believe net neutrality to be primarily important as a preservation of current freedoms.[5] Vinton Cerf, considered a "father of the Internet" and co-inventor of the Internet Protocol, Tim Berners-Lee, creator of the Web, and many others have spoken out in favor of network neutrality.[6][7]

Opponents of net neutrality claim that broadband service providers have no plans to block content or degrade network performance.[8] Despite this claim, there has been a single case where an Internet service provider, Comcast, intentionally slowed peer-to-peer (P2P) communications.[9] Still other companies have begun to use deep packet inspection to discriminate against P2P, FTP, and online games, instituting a cell-phone style billing system of overages, free-to-telecom "value added" services, and bundling.[10] Critics of net neutrality also argue that data discrimination of some kinds, particularly to guarantee quality of service, is not problematic, but is actually highly desirable. Bob Kahn, co-inventor of the Internet Protocol, has called the term net neutrality a "slogan" and states that he opposes establishing it, but he admits that he is against the fragmentation of the net whenever this becomes excluding to other participants.[11] Opponents of net neutrality regulation also argue that the best solution to discrimination by broadband providers is to encourage greater competition among such providers, which is currently limited in many areas.[12]

Should be enough information to draw a conclusion with ;).

BumFodder
BumFodder
  • Member since: Jan. 14, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 37
Melancholy
Response to Net Neutrality 2012-09-27 17:27:15 Reply

Well its a good thing, of course.

Entice
Entice
  • Member since: Jun. 30, 2008
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Blank Slate
Response to Net Neutrality 2012-09-27 17:53:31 Reply

At 9/26/12 12:46 PM, Contraband678 wrote: Opponents of net neutrality claim that broadband service providers have no plans to block content or degrade network performance.

Does that mean that laws preventing that from happening are unnecessary? I don't think so.
You have to think into the future, laws will be around for a long time.

Ericho
Ericho
  • Member since: Sep. 21, 2008
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 44
Movie Buff
Response to Net Neutrality 2012-09-28 11:10:10 Reply

I remember this viral video that featured Tron Guy, Leslie Hall, and someone else talk about net neutrality. Now that I think about it, I can't even remember if they were for or against it, but it was something about giving us more freedom so they were probably against it. Geez, I really should stop getting my information from those things.


You know the world's gone crazy when the best rapper's a white guy and the best golfer's a black guy - Chris Rock