If there was only one developer...

[HeadbangingLegend]

What I actually wanted the title to say was "If you could only play one developer's games forever..."

What I mean is, if you had to pick one game developer and you could play ONLY their games for the rest of your life, what would you choose? This includes all current and possibly future games.

I would most likely pick Valve. I mean every game they release is always an amazing game. Half-Life 2 is praised as one of the best single player sci-fi games of all time, Counter Strike is the best FPS of all time and Portal's GLADoS has won the award for Best Video Game Villain!

And in my opinion, having each game by Valve would give me all the games I'd ever need! Half Life gives me a great series with a compelling story. Team Fortress 2 and Counter Strike gives me all the online FPS action I'll ever need! Left 4 Dead 2 gives me the zombie games and Portal gives me another great story with some nice puzzles to keep my brain thinking! I don't think there are many developers that have such a variety in games as this! The only possible problem, is that after a while I might end up craving a game that isn't First Person!

Well that's my personal choice! So what's yours?

[Oliver]

Popcap.

[Ragnarokia]

I think if I was to pick someone I would go with Riot games in all honesty who make League of Legends. They don't make loads of games or make awesome franchises etc. but what they do act on unlike most developers is the fact they actually seem to care more for pleasing the players than they do for just making profits. Valve also does a lot for it's fanbase but it does have a load of procrastination when it comes to releasing the new games, while Riot likes to keep giving new stuff as often as possible and make it fit with what people like. It seems they actually love their game as if it were their child or pet rather than just as a game and love to pamper it.

If all game developers put in the same desire into their games and wanting to please the gaming world would be a hell of a lot better. Less focusing on money and more focusing on making everything as enjoyable as possible.

[Sword-of-Kings]

I can't choose between Nintendo, Valve, or Rockstar games.

[Dromedary]

Rockstar.

[tahm10]

Nintendo. I like Capcom and Valve more, but mostly for there respective fighters and Fps', which would get boring after a while. Nintendo has more diversity among their titles.

[SneakyGameBoy]

Rockstar. Their games have great quality.

[Leopardclaw]

2K.

2 games in particular as to why: Bioshock and Borderlands.

[Darkeiko]

Atlus, Square's games before 2001, so technically Squaresoft I guess, and Working Designs because I love Lunar. O,o

[II2none]

SEGA especially these days.

Alien colonial marines and sega all star racing transformed for the win.

[Emlfuryoflion]

As much as I love my tales games I would have to say nintendo just because there would be a bigger quantity of high quality titles.

[POTaTOS]

The Behemoth. (+1 to brown-nosing.) Simply because of Replay value. I don't think I'd ever get bored of The Binding of Isaac. Just VERY mad at it.

Capcom is my secondary choice.

[Snaws]

NaughtyDog (they made a great series for Play Station called crashed bandicoot and if you havent played it you arent a 90'z kid and need to gtfo this thread and GTFO my newgroundsg old). NB

[Makeshift]

At 9/2/12 02:37 AM, POTaTOS wrote: The Behemoth. (+1 to brown-nosing.) Simply because of Replay value. I don't think I'd ever get bored of The Binding of Isaac. Just VERY mad at it.

What does that have to do with The Behemoth?

[POTaTOS]

At 9/2/12 02:50 AM, Makeshift wrote:

At 9/2/12 02:37 AM, POTaTOS wrote: The Behemoth. (+1 to brown-nosing.) Simply because of Replay value. I don't think I'd ever get bored of The Binding of Isaac. Just VERY mad at it.

What does that have to do with The Behemoth?

The Behemoth published The Binding of Isaac, didn't they? Because there are handfuls of references to other behemoth games.

[Tony-DarkGrave]

Square Enix, once they get they're shit together and stop releasing shit.

[SubparTony]

Ubisoft or Rockstar

[Jolly]

At 9/2/12 03:06 AM, POTaTOS wrote:

At 9/2/12 02:50 AM, Makeshift wrote:

At 9/2/12 02:37 AM, POTaTOS wrote: The Behemoth. (+1 to brown-nosing.) Simply because of Replay value. I don't think I'd ever get bored of The Binding of Isaac. Just VERY mad at it.

What does that have to do with The Behemoth?

The Behemoth published The Binding of Isaac, didn't they? Because there are handfuls of references to other behemoth games.

The binding of Isaac doesn't have a publisher, unless you consider Steam their publisher. The Binding of Isaac is made by BlueBaby and Komix. Which is why it might have behemoth references in it. In the intro of The Binding of Isaac it says "In Association with Newgrounds", but that doesn't really mean anything.

The only games The Behemoth have released so far are Castle Crashers, Alien Hominid, and Greetings Comrade, which is an iOS game. You don't have much to play there.

My choice, due to the overall quality and quantity of games, is Nintendo.

[Crink]

valve

i only play 1.6 and tf2 now anyway, it's not like it would change at all

[Mownkey]

Buziol Games.

[The-Great-One]

I'm kind of split between Nintendo and Square Enix to be honest. I love The Legend of Zelda series, Mario series, and Metroid would certainly keep me busy. Also Animal Crossing would be a plus as well.

However I have always had this secret love affair with Square. From the early Final Fantasy days, to Kingdom Hearts, Parasite Eve, and many games in-between.

I would have to flip a coin.