At 8/2/12 08:27 PM, Gimmick wrote:
At 8/2/12 03:21 PM, majormelthesackboy wrote:
How about deleting any submission that gets down to a score of 1.00 or less? If the blam score while Under Judgement is 1.50, then why is it fair to have such low scoring items on here just cuz they managed to pass judgement before they tanked? It would also improve the quality of the material on this site. I really concerns me to see what has passed and what's is floating around this site. Examples? :D Hell yeah:
Well, you do have to consider games that were okay-ish (around 2 or more) and then over the course of time before the redesign, they were downvoted such that they had a score below 1.00. What about that? How do you "judge" it in that case?
Easy. Good games don't get down voted. If something is being down voted, then the game is either offensive in some way, or it's not good enough to be voted up. After all, if people vote high because a submission deserves it, then no amount of down voting is going to affect it, right? And remember, we're talking about a score of 1.00, not 3.50. GOOD things DON'T get to a score of 1.00, right? Just cuz something works does not mean it's entertaining, good, or guaranteed to be on the site forever.