Should TV Studios...

[unconsidered]

Put their shows on Youtube, and have ad's pay for the show? Or should they have their own website, where they have their own ad's, or you pay a subscription? Or should they not have their shows on the internet at all?

[Freeze-E]

They shouldn't have it on the internet, it defeats the purpose of growing some balls and paying for real cable!

Real men watch cable

[Sensationalism]

They should stop pulling shows just because the majority of people watch it online and nobody uses their tv but they base the ratings on the few people who use tvs and then cancel everything good that everyone was watching just cuz they watch online FUCK

latest rage THE FINDER

[MiloBased]

There's already Netflix and Hulu. But I guess that could work, most shows end up on youtube anyway.

[unconsidered]

At 7/23/12 03:59 AM, MiloBased wrote: There's already Netflix and Hulu. But I guess that could work, most shows end up on youtube anyway.

I don't think Time Warner or AMC are affiliated with Hulu, and I don't know how soon you can get new episodes of a series on Netflix. I just though it would be cheaper to have your own website, where you don't have to pay licensing fee's or didn't have to share the revenue profit with others. But maybe I'm wrong.

[Halberd]

>He watches t.v and pays for movies

[Jackdabomb]

Yes for internet, no for both their own website and youtube for the simple reason is that it wouldn't work as well as it would on something like hulu or netflix. Hulu+ can go suck a dick

[DoctorStrongbad]

Watching TV on the internet is great. LOST would never show repeats, if you wanted to see one you had to jump on-line.