At 7/21/12 12:45 AM, pinhead-larry wrote:
Family values entitle repsect, boundaries, opinions, and morals.
"Family values" vary from culture to culture.
You might want to be more specific.
If you don't use a boundary like incest to keep you from fucking those smokin' hot cousins, it shows that you don't have respect for them as a family member, rather a sexual object.
I fail to comprehend how sexual relations of that kind indicate a lack of respect for the family member(s) one is having sex with.
Furthermore, it's possible, albeit very peculiar, to love a cousin as a family member and as a lover. If one feels this way about a relative with whom he/she is having sex with, then they can't possibly view them as mere sex objects.
That's flawed logic, pinhead-larry.
Also, your opinion of said female (or male, whatever be the case...) is devalued because one lover is the same to you as a loved one,
I don't even know what this means.
and it also shows that you have no moral values BECAUSE you view females only as a sexual object,
Please tell me how the perception that females are only sex objects indicates a destitution of moral values. If what you are saying is true, then those who hold this perception would also be utterly unrestrained and capable of committing any immoral act.
That would mean that in all likelihood, those who hold this perception would all be murderers, rapists, robbers, thieves, and so on all because they have "no moral values," as you contend.
otherwise you would have no desire to sleep with family members of the opposing sex. Juest sayin...
That's not true.