The Enchanted Cave 2
Delve into a strange cave with a seemingly endless supply of treasure, strategically choos
4.36 / 5.00 33,851 ViewsGhostbusters B.I.P.
COMPLETE edition of the interactive "choose next panel" comic
4.09 / 5.00 12,195 ViewsI think your thread title isn't really suitable, since we literally can't critique these "paintings". But either way I'm starting to doubt your credibility. I can't really see some brushstrokes in your paintings which is quite suspicious, and the pixels are really obvious now that I look at it. I'd like to see you actually draw something though.
At 7/15/12 01:55 AM, UncuterOwl wrote: This is a scan of a painting on canvas? Can we see a larger image showing the whole thing next to recognizable object (soda can or pencil) to get an idea of scale?
Yeah .... can you show a photo of these paintings?
At 7/15/12 01:18 AM, killerrob wrote: The other one is a canvas and I didn't get the chance to remove the texture because I wanted to post it quick
... how do you remove the texture?
And why?
At 7/15/12 07:33 AM, CankerousKitty wrote:At 7/15/12 01:18 AM, killerrob wrote: The other one is a canvas and I didn't get the chance to remove the texture because I wanted to post it quick... how do you remove the texture?
ctrl+z
At 7/15/12 01:44 AM, Fifty-50 wrote: I think your thread title isn't really suitable, since we literally can't critique these "paintings".
This pretty much sums it up, you ask for critiques yet there is literally nothing to critique. They're all radial things. How would somebody even begin critiquing that. I'm not going to say that there is no skill involved because I don't know and I don't care to delve deeper into your process.
I guess the one thing we'd be able to give any criticism on is your color choice. I would highly recommend that you branch out and do abstractions of stuff that actually exists. Like a toaster, or a frog.
Kisses.
At 7/14/12 09:32 PM, killerrob wrote:At 7/14/12 09:23 PM, Sockembop wrote:Nah it's not a filter. I just found this and it didn't dry right.At 7/14/12 09:12 PM, killerrob wrote: The only work in progress I have is this experiment from yesterday, the colors are bad so I might trash it:I think it would look better if you didn't use that filter on it. It looks likes the rough pastel filter or underpainting or something. It just muddies everything up. Kind of a turn off.
At 7/15/12 07:33 AM, CankerousKitty wrote:At 7/15/12 01:18 AM, killerrob wrote: The other one is a canvas and I didn't get the chance to remove the texture because I wanted to post it quick... how do you remove the texture?
You guys are lucky my homework is boring
The top right quadrant is Killerrob's "original painting", I did some dust removal in photoshop (all filter, no manual actions) which gives the bottom half.
Next I added a nice canvas texture using the "texturizer" filter in photoshop. It's not the same color; but you'll see the lines match up. Mind you, this is at standard settings; I didn't even have to adjust the texture zoom.
Did it myself, called texturizer. I would love to see a photo of your "canvas," otherwise you're looking pretty foolish.
you Sneaky Pete.
Been long enough for killerrob to explain himself, but J-qb's pic is damning evidence that these are clearly computer generated with a canvas filter slapped on - and not pain stakingly drawn by hand.
The bullshit meter is off the charts in this thread,
At 7/14/12 03:18 AM, killerrob wrote: I think some of my work is better then what some scouted people have out there.
Hahaha