At 6/15/12 12:00 AM, Kanon wrote:
At 6/14/12 10:20 PM, phsychopath wrote:
At 6/14/12 09:55 PM, Kanon wrote:
Yeah right. I totally believe you.
At 6/14/12 09:30 PM, phsychopath wrote:
Dumb fuck huh? For not wanting to take a chance at coming across something NSFW, while there are my sister's Children running around, Right.
At 6/14/12 09:28 PM, Kanon wrote:
Ok first I hear it's loli, then someone else decides to say it's yuri, What the hell is this about about anyways? And what should I expect if I google this thing?Go to Wikipedia and look it up you dumb fuck.
Not forcing you to dumbfuck,
What the fuck does that mean? That rebuttal doesn't even fit in context, I never accused you of imposition, I accused you of lying.
but then again who gives a fuck what you think because you started this after a simple question.
It was a retarded question. Two people told you to go to Wikipedia and you pulled a bullshit claim out your ass acting like we knew ahead of time. That's the reason why your rebukes are retarded, you're not providing evidence to prove that your claim is true.
What happened today? Cat get run over? Wife/Husband leave you? Lose your house, your job?
Trying to win an argument by means of mere needling, no logical fallacies here.
Nah someone else already gave me a rundown via pm, whereas your stupid ass forgot one thing, Information will always be free. Nice try though.
Then why did you offer to pay for information? Your rebuttals are self contradictory. Additionally, recite the plot synopsis.
It's better than yours though. ;)
I'm sure you think it is.
At 6/14/12 09:56 PM, Yert wrote:
yea like you're going to come across something nsfw on wikipedia you fucking stupid mongoloid piece of shit go kill yourselfYou'd be suprised if you lurked more, and after you suger tits.
If this is true then that means you can reference these pages for us. Don't use the bullshit excuse that you can't because some imaginary toddler is in the room, you don't have to post links, just tell us the names of the pages.
At 6/14/12 10:52 PM, Cootie wrote:
I looked it up on Wikipedia, but now I wish that I wouldn't have.And this is the reason why I asked, Thank you Cootie, Now I know to avoid that page and disregard these two shitheads. But I'll admit. I've had fun with this thread.
Cootie never specified anything regarding imagery on the page, only that he regretted viewing it. Stop using ambiguous assertion to claim victory to an argument.