At 5/9/12 02:18 AM, ILoveToGrok wrote:
By object, I mean that it is tangible.
So it exists as a "real thing", then.
Considering your cognitive distortion of what "real" means I'm just going to write this one off as another episode of you swimming out of your depth while clinging onto the "spout vague bullshit" life-ring.
At 5/9/12 02:12 AM, yurgenburgen wrote:
If good and bad aren't observable or demonstrable in any way (this is what you are essentially claiming when you say they "don't exist at all, not even as concepts"), how is it possible for them to be perceived subjectively, regardless of whether you consider them tripe or not?
Same way God is perceived. Same way luck is perceived. Same way we overtly exaggerate our body's weird pains. Same way we overtly exaggerate our fears and worries. It all doesn't really exist at all.
That isn't answering the question. I asked you how it's possible for good and bad to be perceived in any way when you claimed they don't exist even as concepts, and you responded suggesting that exaggeration and luck also don't exist as concepts, which is nonsense.
You are, once again, tapdancing around having to give real answers and justifications to your claims.
I, on the other hand, am going to bed.