At 5 hours ago, RightWingGamer wrote:
At 44 minutes ago, naronic wrote:
the same, and just jumped at me with your cock out the second I mentioned Reach.
jumped at me with your cock out
with your cock out
Sorry I didn't realize we were fucking 12 arguing here.
Keep the rambling above grade school level or just look up better catch phrases and insults on the web so as to not insult your intelligence to any greater degree.
And it doesn't matter what I "wanted" to do, the point is that I stayed squarely on topic (namely, the vidoc). You sir, did not do the same, and just jumped at me with your cock out the second I mentioned Reach.
Follow me here:
My post: Topical and non-confrontational.
Your post: Off-topic and arrogant.
It seems you still don't get it no matter how much I wipe the windshield for you;
You criticized Halo Reach indirectly, using it as a sort of bad example. This thread had nothing to do with HR in the first place nor your opinion on it.
This is all fine and dandy, I'll even admit that your post was semi-topical and within' your right, but you don't have a right to demand that people don't express their conflicting views for it.
I initially said "implying anything was wrong with Reach" aka why shouldn't Halo 4 take after Reach. Instead of giving constructive feedback that may have made since you instantly fall apart and go on this tangent on how you were stating your supposed opinion and therefore grants you the right to not be criticized.
So in a way, your 2nd post was more confrontational, but rather than responding with intelligent feedback that might have made since, you deflect Newt Gingrich style and demand why I say such a thing about your post in the first place.
If you wan't to criticize Reach and not get criticized back then it's probably a good idea to navigate to a thread specifically pertaining to HR or your negative opinion on any sort of game.