Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Her proportions suck.

Why can't we just conclude she's fat already!
-
-
-
It's settled then! She's fat is NG's final answer! (aka, it's a no go, bro!)

yea...

Her thighs are so out of proportion with the rest of her body that it almost looks like a deformity

At 1/29/12 07:03 PM, 420SWED wrote: yea...

What the hell is that grotesque tumorous growth between that things legs?

At 1/29/12 07:07 PM, Trampzy wrote:

At 1/29/12 07:03 PM, 420SWED wrote: yea...

What the hell is that grotesque tumorous growth between that things legs?

maybe a fish??

At 1/29/12 06:13 PM, Xyphon202 wrote: That woman does not have a CURVY figure.

She has a pear shaped figure. That's curvy in my book. But I guess we can agree to disagree in this case.

:First of all she has thighs the size of beluga whales.

You're not wrong.

Secondly, she does have a gut. Don't lie. Pretty big gut, too.

Pretty big gut??? You can barely see it!

Thirdly, her body outside of her thighs are grossly disproportionate.

Which leads to my belief that this might be Photoshopped.

That picture you posted just looks like a male version of the picture OP posted.

Except for the fact that the picture I posted was a woman.

At 1/28/12 11:17 PM, ModernPatriot wrote: Looks like I have to explain human female body size to you people.

Why do you care so much about what people think of this random broad you've found?

Good Lord, the fuck is wrong with her thighs. Imagine having sex with her, you'd probably get squeezed to death.

She just has huge thighs. Like... abnormal. The rest of her body is fine.

She works a Thigh-Master for a while and she'll be good to go.

At 1/29/12 09:20 AM, ShadyBlackGuy wrote:

At 1/29/12 08:00 AM, sourcola wrote: I don't think anyone should be judged by their size or physical appearance.

Everyone judges other people by their looks, no matter what.

I think that is a very stupid and ignorant thing to say.

WTF are those leg tumours?

Fat thighs, skinny top half....I'd hit it, maybe, maybe not. Depends.

At 1/28/12 10:47 PM, CamerontheConqueror wrote:

At 1/28/12 10:45 PM, Sevkat wrote: lol no, she's fat.

This. Nothing wrong with liking chubby girls though, op.

They have to pay though. It's like a universal law.

She's not fat, but she's disgustingly disproportionate. It's like she took all the fat from her body and and just shoved it all in her thighs because she didn't have anywhere else to store all of it.... Not healthy looking AT ALL.

At 1/29/12 05:49 PM, dlxrevolution wrote: Besides, the OPs picture is not unhealthy, this is unhealthy.

Good God, where did you find that picture?

No, that is pretty fat.

At 1/29/12 06:59 PM, Trampzy wrote: Why can't we just conclude she's fat already!
-
-
-
It's settled then! She's fat is NG's final answer! (aka, it's a no go, bro!)

Yeah, she's fat, but that doesn't mean he can't tap dat.

Thats what i call an unproportionate body. Still probably tap that tho

Not fat

At 1/29/12 09:16 PM, ohbombuh wrote:

At 1/29/12 05:49 PM, dlxrevolution wrote: Besides, the OPs picture is not unhealthy, this is unhealthy.

Good God, where did you find that picture?

Quit cryin, you know you like that. Ok, here's another pic...

At 1/29/12 05:09 PM, JaguarProwlKnight wrote: Are people really this fucking picky with girls?

Unfortunately yes.

I prefer my women to be thick, but I'm not picky. I don't really care what body type a woman has, aslong as she's not too big, or too small.