3,000 terabytes per second

[TeslaShockwave]

Mind = blown.

[Skaren]

May I?

You may.

FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE.

[Entice]

Just think, in a decade or two (maybe less) this will actually be believable.

[TeslaShockwave]

At 1/27/12 09:06 PM, adamflecko wrote: May I?

You may.

FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE.

Actually, it isn't faked. It's a glitched transfer rate estimate.

[OreganoKicker]

At 1/27/12 09:10 PM, bgraybr wrote: Just think, in a decade or two (maybe less) this will actually be believable.

This.
Glitches can be weird sometimes.

Paranormal Activity

[choov]

you overclock the computer?

[k6ka]

Must be from the future; that's impossible at the current.

[tox]

well dont i feel like a old fuck in this thread

[Skaren]

At 1/27/12 09:11 PM, TeslaShockwave wrote:

At 1/27/12 09:06 PM, adamflecko wrote: May I?

You may.

FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE.

Actually, it isn't faked. It's a glitched transfer rate estimate.

I meant fake as in it isn't actually transfering at 3,100 TB, but you are right.

[Archonic]

At 1/27/12 10:26 PM, adamflecko wrote:

At 1/27/12 09:11 PM, TeslaShockwave wrote:

At 1/27/12 09:06 PM, adamflecko wrote: May I?

You may.

FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE.

Actually, it isn't faked. It's a glitched transfer rate estimate.

I meant fake as in it isn't actually transfering at 3,100 TB, but you are right.

Even so, it's certainly better than my 60 KB/s average...

[Nicknicolau]

Fake, you can't printscreen that because of the fastiness

[TeslaShockwave]

At 1/27/12 10:26 PM, adamflecko wrote:

At 1/27/12 09:11 PM, TeslaShockwave wrote:

At 1/27/12 09:06 PM, adamflecko wrote: May I?

You may.

FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE.

Actually, it isn't faked. It's a glitched transfer rate estimate.

I meant fake as in it isn't actually transfering at 3,100 TB, but you are right.

I thought you meant I Photoshopped it or something, lol.
quotekill