Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

*im sure it was an accident!*

Women rubs buttocks against 30mil painting

...

I'm just gonna post my latest tweet.

Even though it's not my favorite type of painting (i like Impressionism personally) what she did is still stupid.

At 1/6/12 05:39 AM, BrockManson wrote: Looks like the artist painted it with his ass anyway.

lol

The Darwin Awards are given to people who die stupid deaths, they have nothing to do with just doing stupid things. Besides, that might not even count so much as a stupid thing as an insane thing. I had no idea how big this was when I first heard about it on "The Colbert Report". I guess it's bad enough that many people are talking about it. It's probably a new record for most expensive thing that anyone ever took a dump on!

At 1/6/12 03:03 AM, Bolo wrote: Art is a beautiful idea, not a beautiful painting. Not very many people understand that.

dam BOLO that was deep and actually made me think for a good while

thanks for that

wish we had more INSIGHTFUL posters around here.. instead of the scum i normally deal with...

that is whats considered art ?, it looks like it was meant to be used as toilet paper

whomever appraised that hunk of shit at $ 30 million needs a lobotomy

At 1/6/12 04:22 AM, Coop wrote: That said, if she'd applied paint to her buttocks and then rubbed them against a blank canvas (especially while videoing it), she'd have become an artistic sensation, thanks to the internet.

I don't know about artistic sensation, but she'd likely become a meme.

At 1/6/12 12:27 PM, SKHM wrote: wish we had more INSIGHTFUL posters around here.. instead of the scum i normally deal with...

Lol, SKHM is the badass cop of the newgrounds bbs. Do you beat the fucking scum silly with your fists and spit on those fucking waste of DNA? Lmao. On topic, yeah the painting aint worth $30 million dollars but even if you don't agree with the price tag or have a beef with art in general. Don't wipe your fucking arse all oer someones work, was the painting actually doing any harm to this freak show women? No, she's an idiot.

"...Colorado woman rubs her buttock against $30 Dollar painting."

... wat.

That's not what a Darwin award is but whatever...

At 1/6/12 02:02 PM, tox wrote:

At 1/6/12 01:27 PM, CharltonChinchilla wrote:

At 1/6/12 12:27 PM, SKHM wrote: wish we had more INSIGHTFUL posters around here.. instead of the scum i normally deal with...

Lol, SKHM is the badass cop of the newgrounds bbs.

Ah noobs, an always occurring source of pre junkie idiotics and stand-up shit jokes, how droll

tox, you truck-driving furry piece of shit, how dare you call me a noob? you want to feel a fucking pwn?

grab your fucking hat, it's about to get windy in this bitch

look at your pretentious misuse of words, droll?????? it's a synonym for funny you fucking idiot, and don't even pretend you were using it ironically

you keep insulting and i'll drive my ass to canada and fill your white trash mouth with all 4 inches of my beefy cock and make you choke

i can't fucking stand posting on the same forums as you

FUCK YOU

f u c k y o u

F-U-C-K Y-O-U

its common sense to protect some thing that is worth 30 MILLION DOLLARS!!!

At least put it in a case or something,

What exactly motivated her to do such a thing?

Goddamn women! They're good for nothing!
Except for being sex slaves, that's all. ;)

At 1/6/12 02:15 PM, Darthleather wrote: What exactly motivated her to do such a thing?

She was drunk. I'm pretty sure the article said that.

That is hilarious.

At 1/5/12 05:04 PM, Travis wrote: I swear... if that thing is worth 30 million than a lot of the stuff on the art portal has to be worth 500 million.

Abstract expressionist paintings are not about the image they depict, but the emotion in the paint strokes and the magnitude of the paintings themselves. Another attribution is that he's dead, which means he can't replace the painting, nor can he make any new ones, which is why it's so ridiculously expensive.

At 1/5/12 05:11 PM, Ilssm wrote: Actually if you read further in the article the original painter did die in like 1980, for what reason I couldn't tell.

I dont think you quite get the Darwin awards.

For the people who are saying the art sucks, the point of abstract art is to kind of like be abstract funnily enough, which is why it looks like random brushes unless you think about what the artist was thinking or what they are making you try to think, which is the point. Also the author is dead, so the painting is going to be worth loads more.

At 1/6/12 09:41 PM, Spikrodd wrote:

At 1/5/12 05:04 PM, Travis wrote: I swear... if that thing is worth 30 million than a lot of the stuff on the art portal has to be worth 500 million.

Abstract expressionist paintings are not about the image they depict, but the emotion in the paint strokes and the magnitude of the paintings themselves. Another attribution is that he's dead, which means he can't replace the painting, nor can he make any new ones, which is why it's so ridiculously expensive.

that's what I was saying!

this post is truly sad, it shows that very few people knows what they are talking about and the collective doesn't know when to keep they're opinions to themselves.....truly sad..................

.....................
.....

In the video it said URINATED on the painting! That's fucking disgusting!