ALright, so I 'm going to reply the way I should have. Honestly, after reading it through again, I still maintain that this is shoddily written, with an added flaw of perceived egotism. My biggest criticism of this is not in fact the philosophy itself, but you're vague insistence of "reading and understanding" in response to people's inquiries about your original post seem to go against your very assertion that you don't make claims that you cannot explain. You have to put more effort into responding.
That is because humans hide the very property that deems my argument solid. If people continue denying that their argument is null; that their belief system collapsed, because they held themselves up with fabricated support beams; if I cannot get people to accept self-humility and accept the fact that I've shot down everything just through their flaws they pretend they do not have; I believe that people will just have to let my philosophy grow on them. I cannot draw you a map of what I see with my mind, but I do my very best to form a tangible source by using metaphors and defeating people's arguments. You can't help but know something is off about them, but you also can't help but think that what I am saying is fallacious and illogical; yet, I am still standing, and you ask yourself ''Why?''.
My first mistake was to overlook this sincere preface.
You /are/ human after all?
This is where you start to lose me and begin to seem egotistical. It seems that you are referring to something specific. There is one very good reason not to listen to someone, and that is because you lead separate lives, and to challenge someone is to not only to say that "I am right" but also that "you are wrong". It's not wrong in itself to assert this in any one situation, but it is a misstep to extend this to "the next time I will also be right" and "the next time you will also be wrong".
I have a big ego. My ego is not inflated, and does not belittle others. I'm trying to bring out the best of people. I give them a chance to fight back, and they only just show how pathetic they really are. They are not pathetic because I deem it so, they are pathetic because they chose to be without acknowledging the very fact that everything they say and do is nothing but a part of their fake haven they have created to make life much more convenient for themselves; rather than getting dirt under their fingernails and to take this world seriously. Who cares who is right or who is wrong. When somebody cannot fight back; their vision should never be carried by straws. I wouldn't give a flying fuck if our human race kept their opinions to themselves, but did you forgot that humans are an 'influential' race? They carry everything psychologically, and they can influence others? It's not like I can climb in their head and hit the ''I'm Wrong'' button. I have to make them realise how serious this is to be, and that only they can muster up their own will to hit that button so we can actually stop playing games with a world that is in a shambles.
What do say to those who believe the world is prospering because of the proliferation of humans?
This world has only been dying. People only pretend that it's prospering; advancing. While our human race continues to indulge themselves, or be victimised by those who indulge themselves.. As this world has no arms or legs to flee from our eternal incompetence.. Watching us burn it to the ground in our empty minds; anti-cognitive, mechanical lapses of a nature that we pertain to as a 'human being'. We aren't 'being' anything but a bane to this world that we pretended was lesser than our human race.. When it was the lesser forms of life that gave us our life, and all we do is take it for granted just because we know we can get away with it.
I find it strange how willing you are to call someone childish though for very different reasons. Children are the students of life. A man in the Wild would find it difficult to engage with society while a child raised in the Wild would be able to learn to live in society with more success. There is nothing "childish" about an insult because children learn to insult from adults.
No. There are no 'students of life'. Knowledge is boundless, and can be found in everything and everyone. There is no secret property where knowledge only lies dormant. Knowledge is as free as we can, but chose not to be. I don't understand why people use the man in the wild examples.. When either way, man will not know how to distinguish what is right from wrong; what is real from fake.. It's the same thing, it depends on the person's life experiences; influences; virtues.. What they decide on, how they saw the world, etc.. Such a vague example. No, insults do not magically come from adults only. Insults are just words, that the receiver chooses to be ''offended'' by. Doesn't matter if you are a child, or adult, or even a rainbow flying dutchman. It's just words that people let hurt them because they are weak-minded.
But this is nothing new. In fact, fear of the unknown IS seeing something in the darkness. People live in darkness and fill in the unknown with, as you say, God and other illusions. But while some of what we fill the darkness with is fearful, like God or nothingness, sometimes what we fill it with is delusional, like truth, an insistence that if we keep reaching out into the dark, our hand will hit something. We know we can never find anything in the dark, but we must for fear of touching nothing. The darkness is not a mirror so much as it is a puddle of unknown depth that we are compelled to step into.
Darkness is a mirror. So is everything else. Humans draw a map of their mind through shadows. Just like shadows; clouds are able to be seen differently; just like philosophy, and this world. The thing is.. This world is like a giant puzzle piece, and if you can find the right pieces.. Things start making sense. The puzzle pieces I've dillgiently put together actually come together..While everyone else's puzzle pieces wouldn't fit.. They just pretended it did, because they got fed up with themselves not being competent enough to put something together.. Which is why I still stand; since my puzzle pieces interconnect.. Why would they come together with completely different concepts if it were an act of deception? When you talk to others.. Things do not fall in place.. When you talk to me.. Things fall in place through time.
So is everything we say a reflection of ourselves? If dog's are able to pretend to be sick, then why can't your mother be right?
Not everything we say. Only the things we mean; not empty words as such. Our dog does not pretend to be sick. My mom saw herself through our dog. I'm not sure why humans do it, but they seem to oddly project themselves onto other things. It's really intriguing.
This example is not well told. Why does the man believe her? It sounds like suggesting that serial killers project their oedipal complexes onto the women they rape, which I don't may be true for some but certainly this is not the driving force for every man.
Why /wouldn't/ the man believe her after he literally beat the shit out of her, raped her, and is completely out of his mind? Your 'rational' minds sometimes..
How do me know that what the shadow says is true? We have no reason to believe the shadow as being the truth.
Yes we do. The shadow is everything we pretend is not of us. The shadow /is/ the part of us we were ashamed of. This is why it's terribly a serious concept, because how can a human fix a problem if they 1. Buried it deep inside them. 2. If they think they are /normal/? When this shadow is found in every single person. Which is why everyone has a dark side of the moon. Which is why everyone has thousands of faces. Everyone has their darkness, my friend. The shadow is the whole of us. We are the ones who are buring the shadow. The shadow was only the shadow because we refused to acknowledge what the shadow really is. /Us/.